The Three-Fifths Compromise

Decent Essays
The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached by the 1787 Constitutional Convention that determined how slaves would be counted in order to settle state representation and taxation for the federal government.
Large-slave states, predominantly in the south, wanted black slaves to be counted as full persons along with the free whites in the population. The South craved power; however, it did not want to be taxed on the slaves which were considered property.
Meanwhile, northern states opposed counting slaves because it would take away from their representation in the House. The South would have more political representation in the House of Representatives and more electoral college votes.
The delegates at the Convention were finally

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Three-Fifths Compromise-Article 1-Section 2 was reached between delegates from the southern states and the northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a debate over how slaves would be counted when determining a state’s total population. It was important to know what the total population was for legislative representation and taxing purposes. The population number would determine the number of seats that a state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years. Constitution Analysis Essay…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three-Fifth's compromise is a compromise where every 5 enslaved people counted as 3 in the state population. All the states agree with the Three-Fifth's Compromise except New Hampshire and Rhode Island. After Three-Fifth's Compromise the Southern States had about 38 percent to nearly 45 percent on the seat in the first U.S Congress. Three-Fifths compromise was the first disagreement…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I thought that the 3/5ths compromise was a fair solution to the dilemma that surrounded how we should count slaves. This is because although slaves are people, they are also property. They work for their masters, and they could be sold from person to person. But because they can think and aren’t irrational animals, they should be also considered as people. Although it wasn’t completely fair to the slaves and states, it was fair and necessary to make sure the Southern states had supported the Constitution.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Section 8

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This was concluded by the Great Compromise in which would create the House of Representatives and the senate in which each state received 2 votes. Another struggle to create a better Constitution was the â…— compromise made in which due to slave states proposing that there slave would count for the population in which they would make it that out of five slaves three would count as citizens. They would also deny the trading of slaves in 1807 as a law. It would also make 9 out of 13 states needed in order to ratify the…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However this proposal was denied by the smaller states that feared and a strong central government. Slavery seemed to be an important issue when getting the approval of every state. States like South Carolina, “Carolina, wanted the convention’s assurances that the slave trade could continue, at least for a time, and that the Africans or Caribbean blacks brought to America would not be considered taxable imports”(pg. 113). After debating and enjoying the 4th of July, the Connecticut Compromise was presented that made compromises like the ⅗ compromise for slaves. This helped bring more universal support for the compromise of a stronger government.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, politicians at the Constitutional Convention created two compromises to address the population gap between the North and South (PN 187). Since representation in the House of Representatives depended on population, the Northern states received significantly more delegates due to the dramatically larger populations. In an effort to balance the representation in the House, the convention created the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted each slave as three-fifths of a person. In exchange, the South agreed to abolish the slave trade on January 1, 1808, which signaled the progressive, gradual decline of slavery in the South. The Compromise of 1787 successfully relieved sectional conflict until 1820, when tensions arose over the land acquired from the Louisiana Purchase in 1803.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconstruction Dbq

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the compromise, the Democrats would allow Haynes to be the president, but he would need to remove the federal troops in the South and support appropriations for the rebuilding of levees along the Mississippi* River. Additionally, he would need to grant subsidies to Southern railroad. And, with this Compromise, Democrats would develop control in politics, thus ending Reconstruction. And, for now, the Union would question as to what issues would…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the South messed with voting rights and increased violence towards suppporters of Reconstruction. Even if the North had not neglected people in the South, it would of take a lot of effort to end the violence and…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the civil war, the states was separate with their own rule of living. The north was full of free state and the south was full of slave states. In this country, slaves was necessary for making money. Yet, they treat them as they was not human even in the free states. The north made a thing called the union with will bring everyone together but, the south didn't want to be apart of it.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue of slavery in the United States became paramount in the late nineteenth century. There were two clear sides in this debate, those pro-slavery and those anti-slavery. This division was quite geographical, pitting the South against the North. Regional differences between the North and the South led to fierce conflict, particularly over the issue of slavery. The Northern states were free states, against the idea of slavery.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hajira Kayani Professor Wathen History 1301 21 Nov 2016 How has slavery affected the West and the Westward Expansion of America? Slavery was present since the American Revolution, and played a huge profitable factor in many lives even before people packed up and moved to the west. Owners, usually whites owned slaves that helped them produce, harvest and work through their systems to earn money.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since 1787, and even before, African-Americans have struggled to gain political, legal, social, and economic equality. Although some national and state government programs were constructed to help African-Americans with this perpetual problem, it is also the same state and national government policies that expanded this problem. In fact, this is still a problem that persists today. The national and state governments definitely have gone a long way in providing African Americans with political, legal and social opportunities; however constant setbacks have lessened their effectiveness. Beginning in 1787 there was an unspoken guarantee that all states had the option to decide whether or not they wanted to be slave sates.…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South feared that if they could not expand slavery then they are being cheated out of their American rights and after time slavery will be done completely away with. This assumption is what the Northern political leaders hoped for. The assumption was if the rest of the country keeps advancing and the South keeps slaves they will…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chandra Manning’s “What this Cruel War was over” poses the question of what the Civil War was fought over. She then introduces the argument that the war was undeniably over slavery. Using the letters, diaries and newspapers of soldiers who lived and fought during the civil war Manning explains the ways in which slavery and race relations influences the men who volunteered and fought in the civil war. Manning begins her book with three quotations that back up her argument.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, there was a major difference between Northern and Southern politics. The South mostly consisted of Democrats. Southerners favored a system of government with strong states and weak federal government, with the right to secede if they disagreed with the federal government. Southerners wanted a government that invested its money agriculture. The South also was also home to most pro-slave states.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays