Plato's Theory Of The Soul Analysis

Improved Essays
tes own theory of the Soul? Socrates own theory of the soul is his explanation of our true self. Our soul is essentially what separates us from animals, as we have will, consciousness, and emotions. Socrates believed our souls were immortal, that once death arrived, our body and soul would separate. When our body dies, our soul dies along with it. The body is the prison of the soul. The nature of our soul is determined by the quality of life we choose to have, as it should be good and beautiful. After we have explored our self-knowledge, we can explain the difference between good and evil. Something Socrates spent a predominantly amount of time exploring, the true definition of virtue (moral excellence). If good is what makes you happy, and …show more content…
How does he justify his conclusions? The Just State would be the ideal society that lives in a harmonious whole. Here it is ruled by the wisest, ideally it should be, good, right and beautiful. The citizens of this perfect world would remain and know their place. They are taught to stay in their place through education and brainwashing, especially through the children. The are taught that the workers have souls of copper, guardians silver, and philosophers of gold. The power would be for everyones benefit. In an ideal society there is selective breeding, excellence would be to create little philosophers. The Just Man is a rational man. They have reason, justice, and most importantly controlled appetite. Different from the unjust men who will never understand the control of appetite, they are needed as they are the people who take care of the economy, the common Joes who don 't have what it takes to run. The virtuous individual, someone who can recognize the difference between what makes something good and evil, will have justice, will act in his place and moderation. According to Plato, the wisest of them all would be the philosopher. Someone who is wise means they should be in harmonic whole with themselves. This means they can govern, excluding their passions, desires, or indulge. The wisest has knowledge on themselves, and society., having respect for …show more content…
“To do one’s own business and not to be a busybody is justice.” (Republic 433b.) Plato backs up his concept by the thought that everything in nature is apart of a hierarchy. That every species, person, thing serves a purpose. Our soul also is also hierarchical, measured by the appetitive part of our spirit, it can rule over rationality. Here we begin to speak about how important REASON is to an individual. They must know the difference between what is real in our mind, and what is controlled by our senses, that can lead to desires and being un-rational. In the ideal Just State we can argue that it is repressive and extremely controlled, leaving no space from rebels or change between classes. Certain art was censored, such as dramas or poetry that involved things such as incest, infidelity, murder, jealously or envy. Plato 's worst thoughts about the Republic has to do with women. He believed their children should be taken away at birth, only left to suckle on their breast for nourishment. He did believe women and men did deserve the same education, if in the same guardian class. He would want everyone to think of each other as family, and to desire all the same thing- peace and harmony among each other. The success of the community relies on every individual doing their

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, he suggests that the soul, as a whole, has parts that are divided up into areas much like the body. For example, consider the virtue or desire to be healthy. Socrates suggest that while there is a desire to be healthy, there is also an opposite desire to be unhealthy. These opposite capacities are the kind that exist simultaneously. Since they exist at same time, Socrates would say that they are in direct opposition to each other in the soul.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. ”(King276). Thus, just by asking two simple questions King has made an entire audience over the continental Southern America think hard about what they believe. Rather, it makes them think about what makes how they are treated unfair and what they will do about…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By this, Plato meant that reason did not overcome spirit, spirit did not over come appetite and so on. The soul was essentially balanced. Plato believed that a soul that is in disorder is miserable and that person will never achieve happiness. He compared the soul to that of a city. An ideal city is that where all parts of the city are working together.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    than went on to a different topic of just and unjust laws in his letter; he stated, “A just law is man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. In other words an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust” (King,611).…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Voice of the Law Socrates is a man who questions what is morally correct and always expands our views and perspective on what it truly means to live. As he talks to Crito in his cell towards the date of his execution, Socrates discusses the importance of being a citizen of Athens. Although Crito tries to convince Socrates to escape, Socrates analyzes his reasons for staying or escaping. Crito is an important scene because it shows Socrate 's rational and thinking process as he is given the two choices, to escape and leave or to face death.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    During the Golden Age of Pericles ' Athens, Plato, an intellectual individual, set out to understand the relations that occurred between the body and the soul. With immense studying of his former teacher, Socrates, Plato came to his realization that the body and the soul were in fact separate from one another. Not only are the two separate, but he discovered that the soul itself is immaterial and immortal and wishes nothing more then to (insert freeing the body quote). Plato’s understanding of the body would not have been possible without Socrates’ theories of opposites, recollection, and scattering of objects.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato and Machiavelli looked into what is best for people and a government structure that can bring to a better society, happiness, and wealth for everyone. Both Plato and Machiavelli focused on a civil society that would work to secure the rule of law and protecting individual’s freedoms, as well as stability as a whole. They agreed that a government or a ruler would have to work for conditions that will bring prosperity of his citizens and a pleasing and satisfactory way of living. These two philosophers were too realistic in emphasizing a political structure of how government should perform to keep its citizens satisfied overall. Plato, for instance, was expecting an ideal government or a “just’’ society that would promote justice for…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    For in Plato’s Phaedo, the soul is understood to merely be harbored in the body for a brief period. According to the Argument from the Form of Life, the soul, as being what gives life to a body, is the form of life thereby and cannot admit the opposite form, which is death (Plato 105D). Hence, the soul is indeed deathless (Plato 105E). We can see that the establishment of a kind of dualism motivates this argument. The soul is successful characterized as completely distinct and separate from the body.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main arguments Plato makes is that the soul has the function of “caring for things, ruling and deliberating (Republic, 353d).” He goes on to add that living is also an essential part of the soul. We can conclude from this that a good soul cares, rules, deliberates, and lives well, while a bad soul does none of these…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The soul has three parts; the appetitive part, spirited part and rational part. The souls must correspond to the natural job of their class. Therefore justice is the same in the soul as it is in the state. “The just man will not be any different from the just city” (435b).…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Plato’s ‘Republic’, happiness and justice are deeply questioned and analyzed as being interconnected. The broadest assumption of a happy person is one who is most wealthy and with very much power. This is almost an unspoken truth, however, does it really work out? One of the most famous Greek philosophers was Socrates, a son of a stonemason who encouraged discussion among many elite, powerful men. In the Republic written by Plato, the idea of a happy person is dissected thoroughly by Socrates and explained.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato had many ideas about human nature, but his stemmed from a route that many Philoshipers failed to examine. Plato believed that Human nature had much more to do with our souls then our bodies. Plato states that the principal task of the soul is to pursue knowledge this we can decipher from the Allegory of the cave. Although Plato believed that the soul has three parts the Logical part, the Spirited and the Appetitive. The Logical part of the soul is responsible for the search for knowledge and truth, while the spirited part Plato identified with anger and temper, lastly the appetitive part of the soul Is responsible for love, sex, hunger and thirst; Plato theorised that the appetitive is generally opposed to the logical side of the soul.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays