The Pros And Cons Of Obedience

Decent Essays
Almost everyday people are moving and doing things. At least half of those actions are done because someone is being told to do them. People complying with what they are being told is obedience. According to Griggs, “Obedience is following the commands of a person in authority” (p. 362). But obedience can be a negative thing to. Some people say the reason for this is destructive obedience. This is following commands but in a destructive manor. But it is said the reasoning for this is because of social forces, it can cause people to do this. Social psychologist Stanley Milgram also believed in this theory. He has done multiple studies on this at Yale University in the early 1960s. But he began these studies due to working on some of Asch’s …show more content…
Milgram conducted an experiment inside of an experiment technically. He had the real experiment of obedience then the fake one of punishment to hide the true experiment. The purpose of this study was to see behavior aka obedience in a strong situation that causes deep consequence to others. He had forty males of participants between the ages of twenty and fifty. With jobs that vary from corporate to plumbers and doctorates to high school diplomas. One of the participants show up to the station with the other and the experimenter explains to them how everything works for punishment by electric shock. There are two roles the learner which is in a separate room and getting the shocks and the teacher giving the shocks. The participant out of the forty males is the teacher. The teacher reads pair of words from the packet, reads down the first list once and the learner is supposed to memorize the pairs. After The teacher is to read the large words and …show more content…
I am sure the answer to that is in the first paragraph but it is just a theory and is deeper than that. There are a couple reasons to why people obey. Whoever is in charge is near the person being told what to do is a factor. If the person in charge was not around what was being told that is dangerous probably would not have been done. For this experiment also when the experimenter was in another room the obedience dropped to twenty point five percent. Also how close the teacher and learner are plays a part, if the teacher hears reactions after each voltage it affects how he continues on with the experiment. So there is the main reason that people obey is because of social forces around them. It also depends on certain situations that impact their decisions is what I think. Just think of today how people drink and in some states smoke under the state age. If the authorities were around at those moments and people were told to drink or smoke they would not and obey the law. I just honestly think that people can obey or disobey to any situation as they please. But as soon as it affects them or people they know in danger then it is hard to obey or disobey. For example at home when I was younger my parents would be at work and tell me to wash my brother’s clothes. I would disobey them because I didn’t feel like doing it. But if they were home at the time and told me to I would have obeyed swiftly because

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To be obedient to authority means to “take directive orders from an authority figure, obedience is practiced to avoid punishment or other unpleasant outcomes due to ignorance of the order”. Usually obedience is done out of fear or respect. Obedience to authority was shown when Luke was made to dig the hole and fill it back up again. When he hadn’t done it fast enough the captain would hit him continuously. Luke begged and pleaded for them to stop abusing him and that he would do whatever they told him and that he will never disobey them ever again.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of this paper is to review and analyze the article written by Stanley Milgram in 1963. This experiment was considered to be one of the most acknowledged research in the history of social psychology that revealed the unpredicted side of human nature. The author described the tendencies of obedience as inevitable part of our lives, particularly since we live in the complex systems of society where human interaction is unavoidable. He illustrated that this specific tendencies of human behavior was extremely relevant at this specific time in history, during which millions of innocent lives had systematically been lost through wars and fascist movements. It is clearly evident that the author became deeply curious about the nature of “obedience”…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Liberals are from Mars and conservative from Venus. The main theme of Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences is to present the reader with how neither is better than the other, but different. The book focuses on the analysis on how biology determines our political views and inclinations. John R. Hibbings, Kevin B. Smith and Jon R. Alford are the authors of Predisposed. As biopoliticians, they provide evidence of people’s view and how it differs based on biology.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inspired by the horrific acts committed by thousands of seemingly “normal” individuals during the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram set out to discover the causes and triggers of unquestioning obedience. He inquired why so many people from uneventful backgrounds followed orders from the most tyrannical and prejudice leader ever facing this world. Basing his theory from that of a grade school friend and famous situationist—Philip Zimbardo—Milgram began to explore the possibility of a situation to force a person to act in opposition of their deepest values and morals. His curiosity resulted in the perpetually debated Milgram Obedience Experiments.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1 The Milgram study was done with the objection of finding out whether obedience for from an authoritative figure was a common occurrence, for example, the killing of Jews by Nazis. Therefore, how long were subjects willing to inflict pin on another person when asked to, despite knowing the seriousness of the injuries. From the experiment, the experimenter established routine through the use of the predefined prods such as ‘please go on and please continue (Myers & Twenge, 2017).’ That way the subject would know what to do when they would hear these words.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary purpose of the Milgram's obedience/electroshock experiment was to test people's obedience to authority. I feel the test was able to fulfill its objectives. It was successful because it should that the majority of people tested were willing to fully accept, with some reservations, what a authority figure instructed them to do. In The Real World by Ferris and Stein (2008), we are told that to conducted the experiment a system was set were a research subject was assigned being a teacher and then two others who were administering the test would join, one as experimenter, the other as a learner. The teacher was then shown the learner being strapped to a chair and electrodes being attracted to there body.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Few Good Men was written by Aaron Sorkin and it is about a lawyer trying to defend two marines accused of murder. The two marines claimed to have received an order to discipline another marine and killed him in the process. The lawyer, Lt. Daniel Kaffee, then has to gather evidence for this claim and eventually get Colonel Jessep to state he gave the marines the order. The story encompasses many factors of obedience to authority and peer pressure and shows what can happen when orders are followed blindly. Many experiments and studies have taken place to explain why people follow orders even if it might violate their morals and result in someone getting hurt.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    If it was possible for one to take a step back from the world and watch every event in human history unfold, one would be given the notion that humans, as imperfect beings, are unsettlingly fond of committing horrendous crimes against their fellow men. Germans oversaw the systematic extermination of six million of their Jewish brethren during World War II (8), and Cambodia's Khmer Rouge regime purposefully executed two million of the country’s own citizens in the 1970s (9). These two examples are from the twentieth century alone; in reality earth’s history of genocides is far more extensive than most individuals would like to give it credit. At a first glance at human history, one might pose the question, “How are ordinary people capable of…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although obedience has a relatively positive connotation, it can be displeasured in situations in which certain individuals are willing to neglect any moral beliefs they have in order to fulfill what is expected of them. Stanley Milgram was an inquisitive psychologist who was bold enough to conduct what no other curious mind had- find the source that gave the sense of obligation when it came from a legitimate authority figure- even if it meant causing life threatening harm to others. The issue addressed is whether one can decipher the difference between ethical obedience and unjustifiable demands. This experiment is to benefit readers in ways that no other proven statistic can, for Milgram knew that the results would allow us to visualize what it is that evinces people to produce such tragic chaos at the snap of a superiors ' fingers.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A central conflict in human society is a divide between obedience and autonomy. People are by nature, herd animals, with a need for the security of knowing their place in the world. In Erich Fromm’s essay, “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem,” states that by being obedient, we gain a measure of the power that we worship, be it the Church or the State or a charismatic leader, and we become strong. We become righteous. It frees us of thought and of the accusation of wrong-doing (Fromm 4).…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experimenter in Milgram’s study was present in the same room where a participant was performing his task. Moreover, if the participant expressed doubts regarding further continuation, the experimenter would encourage him to continue four times using phrases such as ‘Please continue’ or ‘It is absolutely essential that you continue’ (1963 cited in Banyard, 2012). In Hofling et al.’s experiment the authority commanded the participants through a telephone and asked them to carry out the order before the authority arrived to the hospital. As the further Milgram’s research on different variations of his experiment shows, the presence of an authority is an important factor increasing the impact of obedience to…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Experiment In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram (1993-1984) began an experiment that would test to see how obedient people would be no matter the circumstances. One experiment Milgram performed consisted of volunteers shocking someone they did not know if he or she did not answer a question correctly. As the questions are answered incorrectly, the voltage would rise. Unknown to the volunteer, the subject that is being shocked is an actor that is not being electrocuted, and the volunteer was the subject of the experiment. As the experiment continued, the volunteers began to become stressed (Taylor, Peplau, & Sears, 2005, p. 228).…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is a characteristic of human beings in all societies: obedience of God, parents, teachers, managers and any person having an authority. This may seem tyrannical, but it is not. Believe it or not, obedience is a part of the foundation of society. Without obedience, nothing would exist except for chaos and rebellion. Without compliance, stability would diminish and the productivity of the citizens becomes non-existent (Leveillee, 2011, p.1).…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays