• Home Page
  • Critique Of Louis Pojman's Theory Of Ethical Relativism

Critique Of Louis Pojman's Theory Of Ethical Relativism

Superior Essays
Show More
This paper will attempt to analyze the theory of ethical relativism, check the validity of this ethical theory. And evaluate its ethical concepts and it’s competences as an ethical principle to adhere to. Then evaluate Louis Pojman critique on ethical relativism and analyze does he successfully refuted relativism position. And analyze objectivism; the ethical theory which Pojman erects in the place of ethical relativism. And evaluate objectivism, check the validity of this ethical theory and review if it is a competence moral principle to live by. . But before begin we must note what are some of the must agree upon traits of an ethical principle. So we may evaluate each ethical principle being presented in this essay. The first is Prescriptivity; this trait is the ability to guide actions, nature of morality, this trait is used to assign appraise and blame, these are used to provide feelings contentment and guilt. The next is universalizability: moral principles must apply to all people who are in a relevantly similar situations. The next is overridingness: this is trait that holds that a moral principle …show more content…
Pojman set out to proof that there exist at least one universal ethical principle that applied to everyone, human nature is in fact universal. And the fact human beings do in fact act to the means that are goal orientated and it is even more evident that poses an instinctual means to want to survive. This is bluntly clear when we look at situations of attempted or committed suicide. The human body instinctually fights for survival. Pojman provides an ethical principle, whose very bases is built own the advancement and survival of humans. Of all the ethical principles that has been review in this essay, Louis P. Pojman’s objectivism is clearly the better of three, it provides as bases to which we can assign appraisal to behavior and also be able to assign praise and blame and provide a competent medium to produce feelings of gratification and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    How Does Pojman Link Ethnocentrism To Relativism Case Study
    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Does Pojman Link Ethnocentrism To Relativism Case Study

    As we have accepted this belief we grow more accepting of the idea that there are no morals that are superior to others, nor rights or wrongs, moral relativism. Pojman connects these opposing beliefs by showing that people do not solely believe in ethnocentrism or relativism, but a mixture of both, even though people would rather define themselves as relativists. There is a certain pride that…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Louis Pojman Ethical Relativism
    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Louis Pojman Ethical Relativism

    Ethical relativism has been looked at from several different angles by many different people. Louis P. Pojman is one person that has not only questioned, but rejected the concept. Pojman’s argument stands on four objections. His protests are that ethical relativism leads to ridiculous outcomes, gives way to subjectivism, is logically inconsistent, and provides no rational method to resolve conflicts within and between cultures. Pojman theorized that, if the world were to go by ethical relativism, one could no longer make judgements against any society, including their own, because no external or objective truth exists.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Examples Of Moral Relativism
    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Examples Of Moral Relativism

    Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Why Should I Be Moral?
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates Why Should I Be Moral?

    There are many reasons for why one should be moral; that is, why one should act in a morally correct manner when dealing with others. This paper aims to go over two of the main arguments in favor of moral behavior. The first is presented by Socrates in Plato's text Why Should I Be Moral?, which argues that morality and justice are a key part of the soul, one for which man depends on to live a truly happy life. The second is presented by James Rachels in A Critique of Ethical Egoism, in which he argues that we must not treat others differently because there is no non arbitrary difference between others and ourselves.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pojman Argument On Conventionalism Vs Subjectivism
    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pojman Argument On Conventionalism Vs Subjectivism

    In this section, I will review flawed points in the ideas of conventionalism and subjectivism as Pojman partially disagrees with what these ideas are saying. Subjectivism is defined by “all moral principles are justified by virtue of their…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    James Nagel's Views On Moral Relativism
    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    James Nagel's Views On Moral Relativism

    James Rachels: 1: Moral relativism is the perspective that ethical benchmarks, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and in this way subject to a man's individual decision. We can all choose what is right for ourselves. Moral Relativists call attention to that humans are not omniscient, and history is loaded with samples of people and societies acting for the sake of a trustworthy truth later exhibited to be more than error prone, so we ought to be extremely careful about constructing vital ethical decisions in light of a gathered supreme case. Absolutes additionally have a tendency to hinder experimentation and abandon conceivable fields of request which may prompt advance in numerous fields, and smothering the human…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Narratives: Difference Between Naysaying Ethics And Yeasaying Ethics
    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Narratives: Difference Between Naysaying Ethics And Yeasaying Ethics

    Questions on Three Narratives 1. What is the difference between naysaying ethics and yeasaying ethics? Explain. What does this have to do with the story of the people of LeChambon? Naysaying ethics “forbids our doing certain harmful things”, even if that means to close the eyes to the reality and don’t do what people know it’s a right decision.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Four Basic Stanzas Of Metaethics
    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Four Basic Stanzas Of Metaethics

    If Metaethics never existed there would be no deeper meaning to morality itself. Metaethics is a branch of philosophy that analyzes moral values and focuses on the question “what is morality itself is?” (Pacillo-Dellino). Metaethics which is also referred to as “Second Order” has four basic stanzas that are called Four Basic Stanzas of Metaethics. The four basic stanzas of Metaethics are Absolutism, Objectivism, Cultural and Subjective Relativism, and Emotivism.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Satisfactory Moral Theory Analysis
    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Satisfactory Moral Theory Analysis

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Normative Ethics: Consequentialism Vs. Kantianism
    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Normative Ethics: Consequentialism Vs. Kantianism

    For centuries, philosophers have applied sets of normative principles in effort to distinguish if an action is morally right or wrong. The purpose of normative ethics is to help guide society on how humans ought to act. These theories provide justifiable and reliable outcomes to determine if an action is moral or immoral. Two principles that play a significant role in normative ethics are consequentialism and Kantianism. When faced with a moral dilemma, these theories may agree or conflict with one another.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay
    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral Relativism Essay

    Views on Moral Relativism Relativism is one of the main concepts of ethics. Most moral theorist relate to ethics within their articles that they had written, either being against moral relativism or being supporters. Throughout Mary Midgley’s article “Trying Out One’s New Sword,” she argues about the problems that are related to moral relativism. Another philosopher, John Arthur wrote an article “Religion, Morality and Conscience,” which also addresses the issue of relativism from the perspective of foundationalism.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Difference Between Relativism And Objectivism
    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Difference Between Relativism And Objectivism

    Relativism vs. Objectivism There are two different theories dealing with morality, what is right or wrong, and what is good or bad. The theories discussed will be, ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Ethical relativism is defined as having no absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong. Ethical objectivism which claims that some moral rules really are correct. What would it mean for ethics if there were no absolutes?…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Meta Ethical Theory
    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Essay On Meta Ethical Theory

    Therefore, moral relativism is the most reasonable way to look at ethics as ethics can widely differ within its unique context. In identifying the ways of knowing, we have clarified that people take different approaches toward various ethical issues under their own unique context. Then, we explored the areas of study in which ethics are involved, and discovered that certain context, such as time period, can create different viewpoints on ethics. By clearly evaluating the meta-ethical theories after identifying the crucial elements that compose ethics, we discover that moral relativism is the most reasonable way to look at ethics as ethics can widely differ within its unique…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Implications Of Ethical Subjectivism And Cultural Relativism
    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Implications Of Ethical Subjectivism And Cultural Relativism

    INTRODUCTION In this document, I will be discussing ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism. In doing so, the first thing that I will discuss is the theocratical claims that both theories are based on. Then after discussing that, the next thing that I will do is to explain the relationship between both theories. Then lastly, I will outline some of the implications of these ethical positions on classroom practices.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    William Graham Sumner's Acception To Ethical Relativism
    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Graham Sumner's Acception To Ethical Relativism

    In Folkways, William Graham Sumner claimed that morality is actually just a reflection of the mores. He further argued that since morality came from the typical culture groups, it should be only bounded within the group but not universally. The thesis Sumner raised in his argument, aka, ethical relativism, had been challenged by many objections. In this essay, I will provide one objection of ethical relativism and argue that even Sumner attempted to address the objection; his thesis is still fallacious due to begging the question. One critical objection to ethical relativism is the absurd objection.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings