The Theory Of Conflict As Property And The Multiple Fashions By Nils Christie

969 Words Oct 7th, 2014 4 Pages
Nils Christie is trying to implement the notions of perceiving conflicts as a property and the multiple fashions by which it has impacted the victims and accused within the legal system. One may agree with Christie’s indication of conflicts as property but to a certain extent. Furthermore the acuity of his insight is debatable and will be analyzed throughout this paper. Utilizing example of violent crimes within Canada; it will distinguish the strong and weak points of Christie’s argument. Lastly, the means of which experts within the judicial system can be recognized as “professional thieves” will further confirm the theory of conflict as property to another degree.
To begin with, one must comprehend Nils Christie’s main concept before evaluating it. In summary; his thesis is that conflict is a significant element for society to grow as well as, that people’s rights to partake in their conflicts are absent. Also, he considers that encounters are concealed, taken away, and their imperative values are discounted in today’s society. Furthermore, Christie continuously reinforces the idea that people should own their conflicts as a person would own their property. However he demonstrates that that is not the case because these properties are being taken away by the legal system. To start his article, Christie begins to depict what he envisions to be the perfect trial. His idea of the perfect trail originates in Tanzania where we describes a conflict between a man and a women…

Related Documents