The Theories Of The Political Economy Model Essay

1391 Words 6 Pages
There is often a gap between rhetoric and reality in migration policies. Generally this is explained through the inconsistency between the demands of citizens and long term political and strategic interests. There are three theoretical explanations for the prevailing gap between theory and practise in migration policies. The first suggests the outcomes of migration policy are best explained through the political economy approach. Policy outcomes are a result of the deliberation between rational actors who attempt to reach their desired outcome subject to the influence of state interests. The second is the liberal institutional approach which suggests that the state is constrained by societal interests built upon liberal norms. The third transnational approach stipulates that social and political interests are subject to the growing influence of international governance institutions which emphasise human rights. Each of these theories underline the complex nature of governing immigration policy on multiple levels. In the following I will discuss the core theories of the gap between rhetoric and reality in immigration policy. I will examine how an elaboration of the political economy model can help one better understand the gap between rhetoric and reality in migration policy, encouraging a nuanced and expansive approach to migration. Viewing the theories as building upon the political economy approach to I will attest a model of policy in an attempt to understand state and…

Related Documents