Plato Socrates Justice Analysis

Superior Essays
Socrates was executed by the leaders of the city of Athens for practicing philosophy. Since Socrates sought to question the old gods and beliefs in the system of justice, while also encouraging others to think about the same, the leaders sought to eliminate the subject of philosophy from their city altogether. Plato, Socrates ' student, wrote The Republic as an apology to Socrates for the behavior of the Greek, while also aiming towards defending the ideas and philosophy of Socrates on Justice. The process through which Plato managed to explain how justice is a part of the human soul is explained as below:
Book begins with Cephalus, Plato 's father, saying that justice means simply to follow and oblige to the legalities laid down and by following
…show more content…
Socrates begins by saying that one needs to look at justice at two levels -- one at a city level and other at a personal level. Now since city level justice is bigger than personal level, we will therefore discuss and focus on the city level of justice or the political justice. Socrates begins by saying that the foundation of each society is based on the "principle of specialization" -- meaning that each person is required to do that which he is best at doing and suited for. In this, the person should not attempt at doing any other task. This will ensure that all tasks are performed in the best possible …show more content…
The way Socrates explains this is extremely interesting and unique. According to him, similar to political justice where there were three classes in the society, the human soul too is divided into three parts -- the rational part (which seeks truth), the spirited part (which seeks honor) and lastly, an appetitive part (which seeks lust, love, food, looks etc). According to Socrates, the trick is to maintain a balance between these three parts of the soul. Therefore, in a person who is just, the rational part that seeks wisdom would be dominant, and hence, it would rule the rest of parts of the soul. The spirited part would, in its turn, act as the auxiliaries, aiding the human soul in yearning for wisdom and ruling the money-loving part of the soul or the appetite of the soul. This soul is the exact mirror of the way of the just society that Socrates explained

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Socrates is trying explain is that justice can be more than the consequence. It is a good that will make you happier let your soul live well. It is a virtue in allowing to better the…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Chicago cop cleared in unarmed woman’s shooting death”. Headlines just like this are becoming common in today’s society and the main question that the community asks is “when will justice be served?” Living in a time where the black community keeps getting shot by the police and no consequences occur, we have no choice but to question, what is justice? Similar to the modern society, the one Plato lived in confronted this same question of justice. In this paper I will attempt to explain the view that Plato places before us through Socrates in The Republic as to what is justice and does it “pay” better than injustice in society.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's The Crito Argument

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In todays society we find many experts is the fields that they have studied in. You can find an expert in mathematics, science and an expert harpist. In order to prove that they are an expert one must only perform these tasks in such a way to show that they possess expert skills or knowledge. In order for them to gain such knowledge they often will train, study and learn such tasks from teachers, scholars or such experts in the field. In Plato’s work, The Crito, Socrates explores such a question and asks if there is an expert of the human soul.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice is concerned with fairness and morality and virtue, a person who is just is not selfish and will willingly do the right thing no matter the effect it has on them. Justice demands this willingness to be fair, this is a characteristic that is extremely rare to come by. It is human nature to be concerned with the effects a certain action will have on yourself. A just person possesses the ability to set their thoughts about themselves aside and to act in a way that betters the whole (group, city, population). A just person is also willing to stand for what is right no matter the odds or number of people against them.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato was an early Greek philosopher who instituted the Academy and is most well-known for his writings of unparalleled influence. Throughout his life, Plato had written many dialogues over numerous subjects, some being justice, epistemology, political philosophy, and even theology. One of Plato’s most successful and widely read dialogues was the Republic. Before the Republic, many of Plato’s dialogues consisted of a speaker, Socrates, refuting the positions of his interlocutors, and many of the dialogues do not end with an adequate answer. However, the Republic delivers a position in which Socrates takes on justice and its relation to happiness.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates establishes various meanings for “justice”. Early on, justice is simply defined as “a kind of good that we would choose to have not because we desire its consequences, but because we delight in it for its own sake,” (357b). This does not define what justice is, but it brings it introduces it into the book and describes the way humans react to it. Another way is that “justice is the minding of one’s own business and not being a busybody,” (433b). He soon modifies this definition, stating that “the having and doing of one’s own and what belongs to oneself would be agreed to be justice,” (434a).…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s, The Trials and Death of Socrates, Socrates is the ultimate cause of his own death because of not conforming to the democracy of the Athenians and corrupting the young. Socrates was a wise philosopher of his time and was in search of the truth, rather than believing in the Athenians Gods. Nevertheless, it was more than just a simple search for Socrates. His search for the truth turned into a complex journey to where the answer of true wisdom leads Socrates to be brought up on charges of corrupting society. He taught his philosophy of life on the streets to anyone who cared to listen.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Book I of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and Polemarchus debate the assertion “it is just to give to each what is owed to him,” that Simonides originally theorized. The postulation develops from Cephalus’ prior claim that a just man is one who “speaks the truth and repays his debts” (331d). Socrates undermines Cephalus’ definition of justice by proposing a scenario wherein a madman lends a sword to a friend, and the friend may either return the weapon or keep it from the obviously dangerous individual. Socrates concludes that returning the weapon, which would be the “just” action according to Cephalus because it constitutes honest repayment, is unjust. In his debate with Polemarchus, Socrates once again critiques the proposed relationship between…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He goes on to add that the natural attachment of spirit and honor and to recognize the esteem of others (Republic, 581a). He adds that the soul is oftentimes responsible for self-assertion and ambition. When the soul’s desires aren’t met, we oftentimes react with emotional responses such as anger and leads to behavior that naturally flows from these responses. Socrates adds that spirit is the natural ally of reason and part of its function is to support reason between it and our appetites (Republic, 440ef, 442ab). To assign the soul this function is not to say that the corrupt or unjust soul can turn against reason.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice: a set of values deemed "just" that are often used to establish law codes or serve as the basis for governments. And yet, despite its ability to invoke a moral high ground, the concept of justice may often go unexamined. However, in Book I of Plato's Republic, Polemarchus is forced to not only articulate a concise definition of justice, but is also forced to come to its defense in response to an inquisitive Socrates. Through the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates, Plato forces the reader to question the traditional Greek perspective on justice and attempt to develop a new definition. Central to comprehending the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates lies in understanding Polemarchus' notion of justice.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice to the Jury In the Apology, Plato characterizes Socrates to be wise and concerning for men’s souls. Throughout the defense Socrates claims that the jurors can kill him, but they cannot harm him. He believes that if they jurors convict him, they would be harming themselves because they are tainting their souls by ignoring the truth. Socrates’ arguments for these claims are cogent because Socrates centers his arguments on the fact that truth and justice is not truly defined and that man must constantly reflect upon his thoughts to clearly define these qualities.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates defended him self by drawing attention to the fact that he has taught the anyone for many years that would listen with out fee. He even asked the court to excuse his simple mannerisms showing the fact he has never been I trouble with the law, and it was his first time ever being charged with a crime. He talks about how he has never sought public office (power) he talks about how it is society job to influence (work interest of the youth) the youth. He uses an analogy to describe how he is a horse trainer and the youth are horses and how other (society) benefit for his teachings like how to do serein tasks that benefit Athens. Socrates is sentenced to death and given multiple opportunities to escape to another county.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    BOOK V, SECTION 14 Socrates has shown us what is justice, both in the state and the individual. But to give real answer to the questions and problems raised him Trasícamo, Glaucon and Adeimantus, it must now continue to prove that a man is always better to be right than wrong. To achieve this, Socrates must first give a detailed description of injustice, then to contrast these two contrary qualities. Well, if justice is a kind of internal harmony in the state or in the mind, injustice must be a kind of discord or disagreement between the three factions. One type of injustice would occur when emotions become masters of reason or, in our state, when the auxiliary dominate the rulers.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics