Hawaii Supreme Court Case Analysis

Superior Essays
Using the Hawaii Supreme Court’s decision can count as a satisfactory point in which the law to discuss became into being. While the history goes back much farther in this case, prior to 1991, the final decision by the court begins in 1993, where they found it unconstitutional for the state of Hawaii to deny same-sex couples the right to marry (Baehr v. Lewin, 1993). In this instance, the Hawaii Supreme Court relied on a perspective of equal protection, rather than due process, to justify their decision in this matter. Shortly thereafter, the case is remanded to the trial court, to allow the state time and an opportunity to establish its reasons as to why they can deny same-sex couples marriage licenses, which the state delayed until 1996 …show more content…
Constitution, same-sex couples have the same rights and benefits in regards to marriage as any other couple. Additionally, there are continual challenges to these rules, such as the case of the Alabama Supreme Court, keeping both sides of this issue active in defense of their views. As promised, the question remains as to which side of this argument I may fall in line with. On one hand, you have people/groups that want to keep traditional religious and family values intact by reinstating DOMA, on the other, you have people/groups that say this law violates an individual’s basic rights. It is my opinion that the U.S. Supreme Court got it right, no matter an individual’s preferences, they should be guaranteed equal rights as any other individual. Further, anything that may deny another person basic human rights based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, age, etc. should be abolished and/or quashed at any given opportunity, never allowing it to take root. While I could cite numerous case laws, articles, events that would support my position, I do not have to because our past, our present, and our future is all I require. Repeatedly, unjust, and unfair practices have been met with a shift in public opinion through continual perseverance. Understandably, those who oppose another’s’ access to rights, do so from a point of precedent and tradition, in this case, strong traditional family values, and Judeo-Christian values. As always, though, these strong traditional positions are only because one fears the future or is hesitant to relinquish their position of power. The truth is a tradition is not a constant…times change, and we change with them, redefining what tradition

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage now can be between a man and woman or between same-sex people. Loving v. Virginia wasn’t the only case that influenced the ruling of this case; other cases like Lawrence v. Texas, which made same-sex sexual activity in every state legal also affected this case. In the future, knowing that cases from the past can affect current ones can change the way judge’s rule in a…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Originalism v. Judicial Activism Throughout the history of the United States of America, there has always been different controversies among our Constitution. To the best of their abilities the Supreme Court of the United States has resolved each of these cases in a manner relating to interpreting the Constitution. Judicial activism and judicial restraint have been at odds since the adoption of our Constitution in 1787. This continues to this time where the Supreme Court is still ruling on cases that affect our everyday lives.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As I look at each side of the story I can see good point brought up on both sides of the story. For pros, you can’t deny the Constitution, and its rights that it allows people, but on the cons side, many people feel very strongly about their religion and wouldn’t want to go against it. I previously stated in the introduction that I felt that homosexuals should have the same rights that we do. I agree with Frank McEnulty, the President of Our Castle Homes though on the fact that homosexuals should have rights, but not “gay rights”, everyone should have the same rights. McEnulty stated…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the court heard a case in which the plaintiffs argued that a ban on same sex marriage violated certain provisions of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs specifically argued that the ban violated the concept of protection of liberty. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is legal across all 50 states because they view marriage as a union of two people and not solely as a union of a man and a woman. Although it was a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court, the majority opinion stated that the 14th Amendment was being violated. The dissenting opinion on the other hand, focussed on several ideas.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case United States v. Windsor, problems provoked regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The DOMA was a United States federal law that prohibited homosexual marriage while defining a marriage as a relationship between a male and a female. This act was soon ruled unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the 5th amendment. Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer were happily married in Ontario, Canada (2007) until Thea Spyer died in 2009, leaving behind all their property for Edith. Similarly to what usually happens after a spouse dies, Windsor believed that she would be able to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses; however, since Windsor and Spyer had a homosexual marriage, Windsor was not considered Spyer’s…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When there is a conflict between legislation and Constitutional provisions, it is the job of the Court to consider an assertion of liberty. When you apply these considerations, the Court has recognized that the Constitution has protected the right to marry, which was referenced in the case Loving v Virginia, where the Court found the bans on interracial marriage unconstitutional. The implication of the previous case that was concerned about opposite-sex marriages, established a far more important…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage is a civil union that should be a right that all are allowed to. Not just for the individuals, but to promote healthy and happy family relationships. The case does more than allow individuals to marry, it redefines marriage as it has always been know. Some would call marriage an intimate union between a man and a woman to provide a stable family, the government can easily redefine this. The Constitution does not define marriage, the people define marriage.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Case name: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL v. ROBERT P. CASEY, ET AL. Court: Supreme Court of the United States Year of Decision: 1992 Facts: This was a United States Supreme Court case in which the statutory provisions of Pennsylvania regarding abortion was challenged. It required that a married woman seeking an abortion must inform and get consent from her spouse, a 24 hour waiting period, and required consent from at least one parent of a minor seeking an abortion. The parties of this case are Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania, ET AL v. Robert P. Casey, ET AL.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Landmark Court Case Study

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To start with, the court made the right decisions in terms of the constitution and the rights that are guaranteed. This decision has allowed people to be with who they want to be with, and act in the way they want to act. The choice to marry is a very personal choice, and I personally enjoy being able to make that choice for myself, and others should be able to experience this as well. God gave us free will, and while my choices may be different, we were given the right to choose. Rights should not be taken away because they don’t choose what you would.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It wasn’t until a case in 2013 when the Court denied a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act that gay rights were challenged against the Due Process Clause of the 5th amendment. After this, many questions arose around whether or not state bans on gay marriage violated the Due Process Clause and or the Equal Protection clause under the 14th amendment. Later on, in another case, a five-member Court majority finally concluded that the bans did in fact violate both the 5th and 14th amendments. Justice Kennedy protected this declaration by saying that the “Framers of the Constitution ‘did not presume to know the extent of freedom in all of its dimensions, and so they entrusted future generations a charter protecting the right of all persons to enjoy liberty as me we learn its meaning.’” Ever since same-sex marriage was nationally legalized, I honestly believe our society has become more supportive in honoring everyone’s individual differences.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gay Marriage Taxes

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If same-sex couples are paying taxes to help their society, like the same sex couples, they should be afforded the same rights. Gay and lesbian couples are finally suing the state because they are not getting protection they need only because they are gay. John Kusch had a few opinion of his own on this topic, "The whole argument really comes down to letting consenting adults do as they wish, provided they are not hurting anybody and keeping our beliefs out of the lives of others, just as we expect for ourselves." (Kusch 5) People are getting upset that they pay so much money even after not having much to begin with, and getting nothing good out of it.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People are always making fun of gay people. The current culture tells students that being gay is funny and abnormal, but this is not true. Nobody understands what being gay is like unless they have gay family members or friends, who are close to them. Mackie has a close friend, Marissa, who is gay. It changed her perspective.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays