The Supreme Court: The American Judicial System

Superior Essays
The Supreme Court is the highest court of the judicial system and can shape the direction of the American judicial system and the morals of society. All other courts reside under the Supreme Court and adhere to the standards set in cases decided by the Supreme Court. The importance of the Supreme Court explains why the nomination of a new justice to the court can be a heated and contentious situation between the two parties that reside in the American political system. President Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to fill a vacant seat on the court’s bench. This decision created a debate that led to a historic and unusual confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee. There was much animosity between members of the Senate because of unique situations and …show more content…
The first step in appointing a Supreme Court Justice is the President nominating the person he sees fit for the seat in the court. Once the individual is nominated by the President, the individual attends hearings by the Senate Judicial Committee. These hearings allow the Senate to question the nominee’s views on legal proceedings and their interpretation of the law. If there are any doubts regarding the nominee’s morals, legal precedent, or interests, the judicial committee can deny the nominee and force the President to choose a new nominee and the process will have to start over. However, the Senate Judicial Committee can also vote on whether to send the nominee to the floor of the Senate for further deliberation and a vote. A vote is then taken on the Senate floor on whether the nominee should be confirmed to the …show more content…
The opposing side of a topic can perform a filibuster on the Senate floor that can delay a vote. A filibuster is when a member of the Senate talks on the floor of the Senate until the session of Congress is adjourned. This would allow the issue to not be voted upon. Traditionally, to end a filibuster the Senate must have two thirds of the members of the Senate to vote to end debate on the topic; this is called cloture. However, there are ways around these issues of delaying a vote. There is the nuclear option, this option allows the majority party that controls the Senate to change the rules on voting and debating a topic and initiate cloture for a filibuster by a simple majority vote. In 2013 Democrats employed the nuclear option to change the rules for executive nominees to be confirmed by a majority vote because they controlled the Senate. Now, Republicans control the Senate and are returning the favor. To confirm Neil Gorsuch, Republicans implemented the nuclear option and changed the rules for initiating cloture to a simple majority vote. Therefore, the nomination and confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice can be a tense issue to arise in the Senate. There are many ways to confirm or deny topics in the Senate through the use of loopholes such the nuclear option and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This nomination is subject to advice and consent from the senate. We saw earlier last year that the senate rejected the nomination from president Obama. We will have to wait and see what the senate decided regarding the nomination for Judge Gorsuch.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nt1330 Week 7

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After that the bill is returned to the House and Senate Floor for debate and amendments. Then to the Conference committee for reconciliation of the differences between House and Senate. If majority of conferees from each body approves the reconciled bill it sent to the House/Senate Floor debate. If majority of each body passes identical bill, then it is signed into law (or vetoed) by the president. That is not procedural, but a total political process.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Review I believe having a Supreme Court is valuable for any democracy to maintain fairness between governmental power and the rights of citizens. However, with a court that wields such authority, the justices serving these courts must be appointed in a manner that represents a balance in political ideology. Moreover, if multiple appointments are made to the Supreme Court by a president and congress of one political persuasion, the court’s rulings can overwhelmingly favor a particular political party’s ideology. Balanced judicial appointments create balanced rulings in most cases. This neutrality can be disrupted by political influence as evidenced in recent rulings.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    7. Why is the Court’s absence of judicial enforcement important? The absence of enforcement authority has allowed Congress and the president at times to ignore Supreme Court rulings. Congress and presidents have good reasons for favoring this approach that allows Congress to delegate lawmaking discretion to the executive branch without surrendering ultimate control.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Three Branches

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Three Branches In order for the United State of America to have equal power, so that one person would not have more power over another. The Founding Fathers decided to write a constitution to divide the powers in to three branches. Each branches holds different types of responsibilities, but when they combine their powers, it will make sure the government is run smoothly and fairly, so that it is following the citizens’ rights. Each branches has an ability to keep the other two in check and that is how they would maintain balance amongst the three branches.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Realignment

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Discuss realignment in American elections. What is a realignment, and what have been some of the major realignments? Two party system in the United States encourages broad coalitions and parties that include diverse groups. Most likely, small parties that only represent minority wouldn’t be able to win election effectively.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Until the latter part of the twentieth century, most nominations almost involved exclusively the White House and the Senate. Public controversy over nominees rarely existed and the debate included a small number of insiders. The process of nominating Supreme Court justices manifested the cooperation of the three branches of American national government. The Constitution provides for presidential appointment power over “judges of the Supreme Court” with the “Advice and Consent” of the…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court has made a lot of important decisions that impact the lives of United States citizens every day. If I would have to summarize what I have learned from the United States Government class in very few words, it would have to be that the justice system was built to be fair and just for everyone and that the government structure was framed to be as effective as it can be. Even though history has shown more than once that the system can be exploited and government corrupt, like any system and governing body can, it still comes to show that it is effective and was put in place with the people in mind. There was a point in time where the two collided and one of the more important rulings of the Supreme Court has been made. I am talking…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president may not unilaterally appoint justices; he may only nominate them, and abide by the Senate’s verdict on them, whether confirmation or rejection. As the constitutional scholar John McGinnis writes, “the very…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1954, the Supreme Court shifts its support of protecting economic rights during the Lochner era, to a commitment to equality liberalism. Brown is a proper use of the Supreme Court’s power. Its four valid shortcomings reveal the support Brown had from other political actors. Brown’s support provides the court legitimacy for their ruling and provided an era for equality. This era of equality allowed the court and social movements to work in synergy.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Finally, the Committee will report a recommendation to the full Senate. There are three types of recommendations: Favorable Recommendation, Negative Recommendation, or No Recommendation. The third step, the craziest of them all. Throughout the Senate there are 100 senators, 2 for each state. The 100 senators consist of 54 Republicans, 44 Democrats, and 2 Independents.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president can use two types of veto; these include the general veto and the pocket veto. The general veto is the president refusing to sign a bill into law. Congress can override the President’s veto by voting it into law by a two-thirds majority vote in both houses; this action is extremely tough to accomplish due to the diversity of congress. The pocket veto is more complicated. When implementing the pocket veto, The President leaves the bill on his desk unsigned.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays