Supreme Court Justices

Great Essays
Section 1. Once advice and consent is given by the Senate, a special election will be scheduled for eligible citizens within 60 days of advice and consent. It is the duty of these citizens to decide if a Supreme Court nominee is apt for the court.

Section 2. Supreme Court Justices will be subject to physical and psychological exams every two years. These exams will allow medical and psychological professionals to determine if each justice is in the right mindset and health to serve the Court. Special examinations may be required in the event that a Justice appears to have a decline in mental or physical health.

Section 3. At any given moment there may only be a maximum of nine justices on the Supreme Court.

Section 4. If there is, in fact, an even number of justices on the Supreme Court, the justices will take turns sitting out of decision, by order of seniority, making to create an odd number of justices within any vote. This will continue until an odd number of justices is again reached. Students learn throughout their Social Studies and History courses that the Supreme Court, along with the other branches of government, run the United States of America
…show more content…
The government has standards for suitability when it comes to employees. There are commissions that “determine that individuals meet the physical and mental requirements for employment in competitive positions, but has reserved to itself the final authority to determine that individuals fail to meet such requirements.”(340). These don’t currently apply to the Judiciary, but to other government employees. Since psychological and physical exams have been required for government employees in the past, without any disapproval from SCOTUS, the unconstitutional argument cannot currently

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Provide a fully developed essay of at least 500 words, and cite sources used. Marbury versus Madison is considered the most important cases in the history of the Supreme Court. The case took place around from 1789 and lasted until 1803. The constitution called for three branches of the government: legislative, executive, and judiciary. Articles I and II covered legislative and executive.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antonin Scalia was a very respected leader in his line of work. He was known as a conservative Republican who shared his transformative theories, writing, his unique personality and opinions. Scalia was known as an originalist and a believer in the living constitution. Scalia’s brilliant views made him the leader of the conservative intellectual renaissance in his three decades on the supreme court. Antonin Gregory Scalia was appointed to the court by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, as the first Italian American to become a member of the supreme court.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As noted earlier typically president appoint the qualified candidate for Supreme Court justice whose views are aligned with president. Supreme Court justice have lifetime term limit. Let’s assume that Hillary Clinton win this election and elect the liberal justice and majority of the justice as same views as justice Breyer. This makes court to be too powerful and may overturn the more conservative…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 14, 1787, the Federal Convention met at the state house which is now Independence Hall but for two weeks they adjourned meetings until they met their quorum. On May 25th 1787 all states are present except for Rhode Island. But by May 29th, Edmund Randolph presented a plan called the Virginia Plan which was written by James Madison and would provide for a strong centralized government composed of three branches, the judicial, executive and legislative to avert any corruption of power. Madison 's plan describes two houses: one with members elected by the people for 3-year terms and the other older leaders elected by the state legislatures for 7-year terms. Both would use population as the foundation for dividing seats among the states.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The system of checks and balances of power in our political system is essential and judicial review is but one assurance that no single person or group can make a determination to override the Constitution. Members of the Supreme Court must police themselves from within through educated and powerful discussions. It is unlikely that a majority of the group would ever become despots, unchecked by the larger group. In all, there must be checks and balances in our system and the power of judicial review stands as a very critical aspect of this process, while maintaining the equitable balance of power between our branches of…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The President does not, however, have control over when vacancies will happen in the Justices. He also has to pass these appointed Justices to the Senate who have to confirm the appointees. The President’s vote is the only one that controls the selection of a Justice. The Senate can only accept or reject the President’s proposal, they cannot choose for the President. Unless he delegates that power to them.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Everything can change at any moment, suddenly and forever” (“Paul”). American author Paul Auster expressed the famous idea of one moment shaping everything else in the future. On February 24, 1803, one mere Supreme Court case, Marbury v. Madison, changed the course of American history. From this ruling, the Supreme Court gained judicial review: the authority to give their opinions on the constitutionality of laws. This positively impacted America because it prohibited the government from abusing the Constitution.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 29th 2011, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg visited the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. During an interview with Dean John B. Attanasio, she discussed her confirmation process and commented on the different milieu's that candidates have faced when nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Ginsburg explained that “[Between] 1993 and 1994, the climate was so different from the way it is today... The vote on me was 93 to 3. Today my ACLU connection would most likely disqualify me.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The branches of Government consists of three branches: the Legislative which talks about the Court Case of Wesberry v Sanders and how one man’s vote should be equal to another’s ( one person, one vote). The Executive; it has the Court Case of Marbury v United States. It also includes how a panel in the Court is trying to override Congress’ purpose to create a board to practice law enforcement. Then the Judicial on the Court Case on Marbury v Madison with how the British are now in their own little case that is similar to the case.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Branch

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The majority of the cases that the supreme court deals with are typically appealed from lower courts. The people that disagree with the lower court’s decision have to request for the supreme court to hear their case. The supreme court is by no means required to accept this offer unless the case is of something very great importance. Normally the court agrees to handle about 100 of the 7,000 cases every single year. The person requesting for the court to review their case is required to write a summary, known as a brief, about their issue.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founding fathers of the Constitution did not want the government to have too much power in any one agency, so they divided the government into the executive, legislative and judicial branch to avoid tyranny. The Supreme Court is the authority of the judicial branch and the highest of all courts, which can examine the laws and decisions made by Congress and declares them unconstitutional. This does not mean that the Supreme Court has unlimited power because each branch partakes in checks and balance in providing a government of the people. The role of the Supreme Court is to not only to ensure the people equal justice under the Constitution but to also provide as checks and balance within the government. Since the Constitution is complex,…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays