The Supreme Court Antonin Scalia Case

Improved Essays
According to the legal definition found online at thefreedictionary.com, the Supreme Court “decides the most important issues of constitutional and statutory law and is intended to provide legal clarity and consistency for the lower appellate and trial courts”. So what happens when the political ideological values of most powerful court in the country becomes askew? Well, that is exactly what happened with the unexpected death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, and the effects to the Supreme Court’s decisions since then are highlighted in the New York Times’ article I read titled The Right-Wing Supreme Court That Wasn’t by Adam Liptak.
The article I found in the New York Times mentions that just before Scalia’s death there were an influx of cases which were believed to eventually move laws to a more conservative side, but his death led to a few of the major decisions made to
…show more content…
4). Here the author mentions two important factors that will greatly impact the final form of the Supreme Court. First, being that three of the Supreme Court Justices are seventy eight years of age or older and very close to either retirement or death (Supreme Court shifts left, para. 15). Second, that with a seat open and possibly more to open soon, our next President will have a great impact on deciding who will fill the seats which will affect Supreme Courts decisions years to come. The article continues on to describe how the Supreme Court was left hung on multiple issues without Scalia’s vote to break the tie. One particular case that was left hung was a proposal by Obama to prevent up to five million immigrants from being deported (para. 10). Liptak reveals that even though Scalia’s death has had many negative impacts for the Supreme Court there was still a bit of positive that emerged from it. That is, a few of the Supreme

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The political landscape as we know it today has always allowed The President of the United States to select his own Supreme Court judge. However, should the Supreme Court Judge’s beliefs represent the traits or value systems of the President of United States? For example, President George Bush appointed both Clarence Thomas and David Souter, two contrasting personalities say the least. Nonetheless, Clarence Thomas was known for his boldness, committed to seeking out the original meaning of the Constitution, perhaps, similarities to President Bush prosecuted the Gulf War and how he stood behind Thomas controversial confirmation hearings (McGinnis, Flaherty, 1995).…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Essay

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title and Citation: Fry V. Napoleon Community School District Topic: A school district denying the student the right to have a service dog attend school. Level or Type of Court: Supreme Court- Oct 2016 Facts of the Case: A student with cerebral palsy obtained a service dog with the doctor’s approval to help her live as independent as possible. The service dog was hypo-allergenic and was to stay out of the way when not needed.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Provide a fully developed essay of at least 500 words, and cite sources used. Marbury versus Madison is considered the most important cases in the history of the Supreme Court. The case took place around from 1789 and lasted until 1803. The constitution called for three branches of the government: legislative, executive, and judiciary. Articles I and II covered legislative and executive.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges elected by Republican Presidents in the 70’s and 80’s are still in the Supreme Court. 1970’s-1980’s Republican beliefs still play a part in modern politics. Political agendas play a role when presidents have to appoint a justice because they want a candidate that ten years down the line will make judicial decisions that support their views. That may be slightly off topic, but it demonstrates the power the president has in his hands when electing a justice. However, the power is also in the hands of Congress.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scorpions: An Analysis

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of his career, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt appointed a total of seven justices to the United States Supreme Court. Professor of Law at Harvard, and author, Noah Feldman, focuses on the background and evolution of four of FDR’s most influential justice appointees—Felix Frankfurter, Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, and Robert Jackson— throughout his book Scorpions. In the Supreme Court of FDR, and in our modern-day court, one often wonders how justices’ rulings are influenced. Throughout Scorpions, one may see FDR’s justices’ voting behavior demonstrates that a justice’s background, and their friendships, or vendettas against other members on the court, may impact voting behavior. In addition, there may be different degrees…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an elegant act of “judicial jujitsu,” the Supreme Court issued its decision in Marbury v. Madison on February 24, 1803, establishing the high court’s power of judicial review. The dramatic tale begins with the presidential election of 1800, in which President John Adams, a Federalist, lost reelection to Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Congress also changed hands, with the Democratic-Republicans achieving majorities in both chambers. Adams could see the writing on the wall: his party had been relegated to the judicial branch.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As noted earlier typically president appoint the qualified candidate for Supreme Court justice whose views are aligned with president. Supreme Court justice have lifetime term limit. Let’s assume that Hillary Clinton win this election and elect the liberal justice and majority of the justice as same views as justice Breyer. This makes court to be too powerful and may overturn the more conservative…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lawrence V. Wade

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Amanda Black Exam Essays Fall Quarter 12/5/2007 Scalia explains his dissenting opinion to the overturning of Lawrence v. Texas by comparing the case to Roe v. Wade in three areas. He looks at stare decisis, fundamental rights, and legal moralism. There are three things that need to be proven before the court can overrule a decision in regards to stare decisis. 1) Its foundations have been eroded by subsequent decisions; 2) it has been subject to substantial and continuing criticism; 3) it has not induced individual or social reliance that counsels against overturning it.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In theory, the Supreme Court is meant to be the unbiased force in the United States. However, it has become increasingly apparent that the Supreme Court Justices have a noticeable bias towards their political parties. Unlike Congress, where the political bias from the representatives is expected, the Supreme Court is not meant to have a political leaning. The Constitution states the purpose of the Supreme Court is meant to interpret the Constitution in the most apolitical way possible. However, this is a very recent issue that has developed.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law and Order Supreme Court justice could be called the most prestigious law job in America. Justices make some of the most important decisions for the United States, and once appointed they serve for life, or until they step down. Unfortunately, there is no definite time when a justice’s “life term” will come to an end, and Justice Antonin Scalia’s suddenly ended earlier this year. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died suddenly this year during a hunting trip in Texas at age 79. Scalia was an influential conservative justice in the Supreme Court, and his death leaves the court with a 4-4 split of democratic to republican justices.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pewresearch.com took a survey on Republicans, Democrats, and Independents on whether the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they are meant today or as they were originally written. Most Republicans said that the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they were originally written (69% to 29%). On the other hand, Democrats (70% to 26%) and Independents (48% to 47%) said that the court rulings today should be based on what the U.S. Constitution means in current times. In total 49% of the people that were surveyed, said that the Supreme Court should base rulings on today’s meaning of it. 46% of people surveyed said that they should rule court cases by how the U.S. Constitution was originally written.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays