The Struggle Between The Democrats And The Whig Party

Decent Essays
At the same time in history, the issue of slavery divided Democrats into the Northern and Southern branches. It would not be hard to guess that the southern Democrats favored slavery. They also believed that a state does have the right to secede from the union if the national government should interfere with slavery. From 1832 to the mid-1850s, under presidents Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, James K. Polk, the Democrats usually defeated the opposition Whig Party by slim margins. Both parties ran hard to build grassroots organizations and maximize the attendance of voters, which often reached 80% or 90%. Both parties used patronage broadly to finance their operations, which encompassed emerging big city political machines as well as national

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    New England Federalists did not have any reason to trust the decisions of the Democratic-Republican party along with Thomas Jefferson or James Madison. In the years spanning from 1805-1812 the presidents belonging to this party created and passed acts and treaties that repeatedly failed and hurt the New England economy. The first plan President Jefferson tried was planned to counteract the trade restriction Britain was imposing on the United States. The United States Congress passed the Non-Importation Acts in 1806. This forbid Britain to import specific manufactured goods to the United States (Malone, Dumas).…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    "Northern and Southern lawmakers united around various issues, but now slavery became a dividing factor that could not be ignored"16. The party was created just to be the direct opposite of the Democrats. "Most important it led to the formation, beginning in 1854, of the Republican Party. That party was found in diametric opposition to the operating principles of the Democratic party. "17.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the late 1830’s, the Whig Party was very successful. The economic Panic of 1837 set two principles for the success of the Whig Party. The first was that the public attention concentrated on the failings of the Democratic politics (Guelzo, 2001). The second principle was that it produced the largest percentage of new voters in every cycle of the presidency. The good thing about this was that once a person was recruited to a party, they would rarely switch over time.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nick Rubin Gaul U.S. History 30 January 2015 After the signing of the constitution, it is evident that the Northern and Southern halves of the United States developed along different lines. The South remained predominantly agrarian with an explosion in cotton production, while the North became more and more industrialized. Different social cultures and political beliefs developed. This led to disagreements on many issues, like tariffs, taxes, and states rights, but when vast new tracts of land were added after the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican Cession, the expansion of slavery was the burning issue that led to the disruption of the union.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this activity, compare and contrast the three major Reconstruction plans: Lincoln's, Johnson's, and the Radical Republicans'. Which was the most logical and why? What would your plan have been? Johnson’s plan was the most logical because it balanced quickly healing the Union and punishing the South.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The North and South territories of the United States developed in different ways during the 1800s. The North favored small farms over large plantations, went through an Industrial Revolution, and established many large cities. On the other hand, the South utilized large-scale farms and slave labor to grow cash crops such as tobacco and cotton. The stark differences between these two cultures led to many disagreements that ultimately drove the South out of the Union. There were many catalysts such as John Brown’s raid and the Election of 1860 that depicted the hatred between the two sides.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary cause of the sectional controversy of 1819 was the question of what should be done with the territories west of the Mississippi River. Should they be free or slave territories? Neither side was willing to agree with the other. When Missouri sought to obtain statehood, a resolution was drafted prohibiting more slaves from being brought into Missouri, and granting slaves born after statehood freedom after a certain age. This notion was debated about among the House and the Senate for some time.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1860 Political Compromise

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I think the political compromise over the sectional crisis of the 1850s seemed impossible by the 1860 because of the events leading up to the 1860 election and the election itself. The North’s neglect to obey the Fugitive State Law angered southern states and was a problem especially for Border States. When I slave was able to escape to the north, they did everything they could to make the slave a “free man”. A known fact about the north is they hated slavery as Henry Benning explained in his speech, and president Buchanan did nothing to prevent the secession of the seven states, as congress was more active during Buchanan’s time as president. All of the events angered or did little to prevent the events about to take place in the south and…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Priscilla Etim HIST 1301 Professor James Adams July 26, 2017 The Great Compromise: The Ideals and Values of a Growing Nation The Great Compromise of 1787 is the compromise or the settled agreement of the dispute that erupted due to conflicting views and objectives presented from the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. The purpose of these plans was to create proposed changes to the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the leaders of the Whigs consisted of Robert Walpole, Henry Clan and Daniel Webster. With the death of Henry Clay and Daniel Webster, it left the Whigs weak and they fell apart in the 1850’s. (Norton, 2015) Democratic voters consisted of farmers, urban workers, and immigrant workers, while the businessmen and plantation owners were against the democratic ways. The Whigs’ were for a moral reform consisting of evangelical Protestants along with free black supporters.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carl L. Becker wrote The Spirit of ’76 in a creative and unconventional way of retelling history. In this fictional diary, he introduced two gentlemen: Jeremiah Wynkoop (Whig) and Old Nicholas (Tory); both of the same economic standing but with opposing views. Becker efficiently highlighted these two contrasting views to represent internal struggles between Whigs and Tories regarding the events that transpired during the significant years before…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Whig Party, which was formed in the early 1830’s, banded together a group of individuals who all opposed what was being called the domination of “King Andrew” Jackson. The name Whig was derived from the British party which was opposed to royal prerogatives. Jackson, who was victorious in 1828 and 1832, completely shattered the National Republican Party. Jackson’s actions with the Bank of America, the Native Americans, the Supreme Court, and his distasteful use of power as president regarding war, infuriated his political opponents. According to The Gale Group, “The Whig Party included former National Republicans, conservative factions of the democratic-republican party, and some former members of the Anti-Masonic Party.”…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1787, the Continental Congress was brought together in the Philadelphia Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was written and since people had different views on how to interpret it, two political parties were eventually formed: The federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The main reason for the rise of political parties during the 1790s was because each of the parties favored different political and economical reforms needed as a new, developing country. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and they favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, while Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party favored strict interpretation. The Federalists wanted to create a national economy by creating…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri compromise, was a bill that was formed to create boundaries that split the United States between the Northern free states (non-slavery), and the Southern slave states. The boundary line for slave states and non-slave states was latitude 36°30′(see map below). At the time the northern states economy was industrial, and the southern states economy was more agricultural. For this reason the southern states relied heavily on the use of slaves to farm the land. In 1819 Alabama joined the union as a slave state.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, there was a major difference between Northern and Southern politics. The South mostly consisted of Democrats. Southerners favored a system of government with strong states and weak federal government, with the right to secede if they disagreed with the federal government. Southerners wanted a government that invested its money agriculture. The South also was also home to most pro-slave states.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays