Articles Of Confederation Analysis

Improved Essays
The American Revolution and the fight for independence against the British sparked a growing need for a stronger government. Therefore the Continental Congress drafted the Articles of Confederation in 1777. “The Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution of the United States” (Give Me Liberty 249). Before the articles there had been no republican government of any kind. “The local loyalties outweighed national patriotism, and John Adams was quoted saying, we have no Americans in America” (Give Me Liberty 248). This sparked a change in American government that paved the way for many new opportunities for our growing nation. This came with many challenges of course, but the Articles of Confederation served as the first framework …show more content…
One of the weaknesses of the articles was the distribution of power. The Articles left too much power to the states and not enough power to the national/central government (Give Me Liberty 250). The majority of the power was held by the states, which left little judiciary power and with no judicial power there was no one to interpret the laws. As well as no judicial power there was no president and with no president there was no one to enforce the laws (Give Me Liberty 249).Since the state government held so much power, the national government didn’t have enough power to force states to obey its laws (Lecture 7). Another huge weakness of the Articles of Confederation was the lack of money. During the Revolution, America racked up huge amounts of debt due to the war against Britain and with no constitutional revenue there was no way to pay off the debts and therefore America was broke. Under the Articles of Confederation, “congress had no real financial resources, it could coin money but lacked the power to levy taxes or regulate commerce” (Give Me Liberty 249).However, each state could print its own paper money which led to big problems. The colonies started to put taxes on trade between states (lecture 7). Another weakness was the requirement of a three- fourths majority to pass any new laws. That meant that nine of the thirteen colonies had to agree for anything to …show more content…
This document played a huge part in the strengthening of our nation. The constitution was created with hopes of fixing the problems the Articles created. The constitution was drafted by many of our founding fathers. “It quickly became apparent that the delegates agreed on many points. The new constitution would create a legislature, an executive, and a national judiciary” (Give Me Liberty 258). That was one of the biggest things the constitution fixed was the separation of powers. However, it didn’t come easy the topic of how much power the states should get versus the amount of power the national government should hold was the most divided topic. A compromise was reached, “a two-house congress consisting of a senate in which each state had two members, and a house of representatives apportioned according to population” (Give Me Liberty 258). The creation of branches of government was one of the biggest success of the constitution. Along with the separation of powers the new government was becoming stronger. The constitution created the branches as well as the separation of powers to ensure that no one party could dominate another (Give Me Liberty 260).
The creation of the Constitution cleared up the grey area that the Article of Confederation consisted of. It set standards for the future of American government.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Under the Constitution, a strong central government was created, uniting what was formerly a loose confederation of states. The Articles of Confederation attempted to maintain order among the states, but with only nominal power it accomplished little. It lacked the ability to tax, enforce laws, provide common defense, and settle disputes between states and did not establish standard weights and…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the Articles of Confederation had beyond multiple reasons why it was a bad idea, there are still some good reasons that make our country what it is today. The most important reason is that it is how we got called “the United States of America,” united being the key word. I believe this gave the people a sense of unity. After the American Revolution the Articles of Confederation provided relief because it was the first attempt at a government for the new country. This government could eventually rebuild after…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the United States had just declared their independence, it was clear that governmental structure needed to be established. In 1777, the Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, which all states would ratify by 1781. The Articles of Confederation would prove to be a weak constitution, giving too much power to the states and not having a strong enough central government. This realization led to several changes being made until a new framework was implemented. The Constitution established a better relationship between central and state governments, while making sure that no form of government would become too powerful. In addition, the guarantee and protection of citizen rights were also written into this new constitution.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was a document that held the laws of the time period for America. It was ratified on March 1, 1787 and was originally helpful to America and its citizens. At first, not many people approved of these articles because they were afraid of a central government that would be similar to the kings and queens in Europe, but the congress made sure to leave independence for each state.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The articles of confederation was the Untied States first attempt at creating a democratic government. Meaning instead of giving power to the central government they decided to divide it up with different states. But it all wasn't good, congress had trouble passing laws due to the fact that 9 of the 13 states had to agree before any laws could be passed (Doc 1). Congress did not have the power to collect the taxes needed to pay for the expense of the national government (Doc 2). Also the states refused to give the national government enough power to work correctly.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation, ratified by all thirteen states on March 1, 1781, did not provide the United States with an effective government. In order to determine exactly how ineffective this government was, we need to look deeper into the economic, political, and ideological aspects that the Articles of Confederation presented at that time. Economically, the Articles of Confederation left Congress with no power to regulate commerce, which resulted in the states being able to establish laws regarding tariffs and navigation laws. Politically, the Articles of Confederation left the United States with a weak central government, and no executive branch. Ideologically, the Articles of Confederation was an attempt to bridge the trust between the people and the national government. Thus, the Articles of Confederation did, to a great extent, not make an effective government in the United States.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison to the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution is much stronger and stable because it has clear laws that are fair to the people and benefitted for the good of the country. For instance, it allowed more than one group of people to rule others and gave people the freedom to do whatever they wanted as long as it’s constitutional. This was how they made the United States more of a democracy rather than a…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many people see the Articles of Confederation as a constitution that failed, however it did do some good for the United States. In the mid 1780s, the national government resolved a series of territorial disputes between states when they passed the Land Ordinance laws. Land was set aside in the west for schools and rules were established for creating new states. Although, the Articles of Confederation fixed land disputes it could not fix the economic issues that followed after the war. States were left in debt and unable to pay it off, resulting in an economic depression. However under the articles the government did not have the power to tax or request money, so the Constitution was introduced in hopes that it could fix these issues. Under…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many issues with it and at times was completely unable to work as desired; when the Constitution was created it was considered to be one of the best things that had occurred. In 1787 the Constitutional Convention came together and they were after much arguing and finally compromising they came up with what we know as the Constitution (History of the United States Forming a New Nation (1784-1819)). Prior to the Constitution, states were governed under the Articles of Confederation which created problems. Each of the states was governed by an elected official and the state delegates who created a weak national government. Congress had to force the states to pay fees in order to cover the social costs of the nation.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Too much power was given to the states, too little power was given to Congress, and no primary leader was appointed. The people were afraid of a “chief executive who would rule tyrannical. In turn, the Articles of Confederation were written to where the “president” was no more than the chairman at meetings with the Continental Congress. Without an executive branch, there was no one to enforce any acts passed by Congress, the states could, and did, ignore the majority of the rules Congress attempted to make. The lack of a chief executive created problem s when trying to deal with foreign affairs, as well as threats from the inside and the outside of the confederation. There was no representative to meet with foreign diplomats to make any negotiations and assist in solving…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While the Articles of Confederation seemed to be working well for a short amount of time, some great flaws within their system began to show. The Articles of Confederation gave Congress almost no power to do anything, because they were not receiving any money. Because Congress had no way to tax the states, they had to ask the states for money, which didn’t work very efficiently. The states were also allowed to have their own form of currency, which made it difficult to make payments between states. The Articles of Confederation also made it difficult to change any laws or create any new ones. The states had to agree with one another to make changes in laws or in the Articles of Confederation. This was a very difficult task because without all thirteen states agreeing with one another there could not be any change, and it is very difficult to have them all agree. These problems eventually led to the failing of the Articles of Confederation. To conclude, The Articles of Confederation did live up to some principles of the Declaration of Independence, but there were some problems with it…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the formation of the U.S. government, two different forms of government were initiated. At first, the Americans wanted to form a government that was nothing like monarchy, as they didn’t want a repeat of King George. The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution of the United States, which was ratified in 1781. However, the Articles of Confederation had issues. The main issue was that the national government was too weak. Central government had no way to get money under the Articles, for the states would refuse the request, as they were not obligated to do so. The army was not being paid and was nearly deserted, and debts to foreign countries were not being paid. The government became too weak, so therefore a new constitution…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason behind a weak national government with the Articles of Confederation was that Americans wanted to avoid a tyranny such as the one that ruined their relationship with the British. However, they made the central government too weak, so much so that it held little power and authority over the states and each state resembled an independent nation. Thus, the purpose of the Constitution was to unite the country while protecting its citizens from…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many strength, but as did weaknesses. A weakness was that Congress had no type of income, because each state had their own currency. Congress wasn’t able to impose taxes; they were only allowed to borrow money. Their only revenue would only come from different sates. The article granted limited powers to the central government.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation’s first flaw is that it did not give congress hardly any power. For a country to run properly and fairly, it needs to have a strong central government. When the government is not given enough power, States start to branch off and try to be…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays