The Strange Case Of Thomas Hobbes, By John Locke

Decent Essays
After reading your response and actually reading about the case, you have caused me to change my mind. I see that Bradenton had no remorse for bludgeoning his parents to death. His sole purpose was to obtain money that he will actually never get to see. Although Locke believed that we as race act upon "natural goodness," in this situation Hobbes view worked for the best. The judge's statement was accurate for the crime committed and as a leader handed the correct punishment so that we could continue to live harmoniously. I think that because I was caught up in living harmoniously, that I expected the judge to be a little lenient and may allow him to grow from what he has done while in jail.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English political philosopher born on April 5, 1588 in Westport, Wiltshire. He received an education at Oxford University in England where he studied classics. In his early life, he traveled to many European countries to meet scientists and study the knowledge of government. Hobbes became interested in government and questioned why people let themselves be ruled. This idea brought on more ideas and soon he started thinking of a new form of government for England.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Timothy Ring Case Study

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The judge was trying to do what was morally right and make sure this offender pays his debt to society. I believe also the discretion that the judge made brought justice to the victims family. In the criminal justice system the main purpose is to serve justice. I do think that justice was served. I’m not a fan of the death penalty…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I truly believe that genetics are by far one of the biggest factors in determining the action and/or morals of an individual. In this debate, I personally agree with Thomas Hobbes in the idea that the nature of man is evil and as he states, “Everything humans beings voluntarily do is for pleasure or for self-preservation.” I feel this concept is heavily shown through the fact that all human beings react differently if put in the same situation. This shows that even though one's environment will be the same as someone else’s, people's personality determines the morals and decisions made by said individual. For example, some criminals have safe surroundings and good environments, but still make the conscious decision to commit a felony.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The famous political texts Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes and The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke have had a profound impact on what is seen to be the role of government in society, with the latter having more lasting influence, particularly in modern society. The former, in short, argues that men ought to submit themselves and all of their rights to an entity with absolute authority over them, and that no matter how this man, or assembly of men abuses its power, they ought not to resist this entity, as the alternative is a chaotic, violent world. Just by examining the thesis of Hobbes’ work, one would easily deduce that such an idea is contrary to the ideals lauded in our modern society, those being of certain inalienable rights, the rule of law, and the separation/limitation of powers. Locke presents each of these aforementioned ideals and explains them to be essential to governance for the common good.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yes, Locke is correct at believing that people should have morals and be able to conduct themselves accordingly; yet, the idea that every man respects the next man 's property without having to say anything is just not reasonable or plausible for this day and age. Although living in John Locke’s perfect self-ruled, equality world would be nice, for the society and day and age we live in now Hobbes ideas work better for…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 17th century, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were philosophers who developed beliefs about the nature of man, which influenced their political philosophies and ideas about the social contract between the people and their government. Thomas Hobbes believed that all humans were naturally wicked and selfish. He stated that without a government there would be war with every man against each other and life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. Meanwhile, John Locke believed that all humans were naturally good and could learn from their experiences and improve themselves. He thought as reasonable human beings, humans had the natural ability to govern their own affairs and to look after themselves.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke’s methods of discerning the cause of man’s desire to join a commonwealth are very similar, yet they both have dissimilar views on what the state of nature should be like and what the legitimate power would look like, but Locke’s creation of executive prerogative complicates his negative views of Hobbes’s sovereign. Though Locke disagrees often with the works of Hobbes, he does share similar qualities of both his view of legitimate political power and what the state of nature is like. In both Hobbes and Locke’s view, the legitimate authority of government comes from receiving the consent of those that want to join the commonwealth while still in the state of nature. In the state of nature, Hobbes and Locke both agree on the idea that man is an individualist, looking out only for himself.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When considering the guidelines for humanity, philosophers and leaders alike come to unravel the fabric of society by constructing a system that is tailored towards preserving liberty. The political philosopher John Locke helps to bring to light the nature of humanity and how it can be structured around a social contract. This contract would enable individuals certain rights by allowing government officials to enforce a law that protects members of society from being oppressed or denied freedom. I admire the virtues in which Locke fights for; namely, the right to life, liberty, and owning property. These essential virtues, when under the political structure of Locke’s philosophy, helps society from being oppressed by a tyrannical government…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout their writing, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and J.S. Mill hold differing views on freedom. At the same time, each highlights different impediments to freedom. In this paper, I argue that the obstacles to freedom that they see leads to different ideas of freedom and subsequently divergent ideas concerning the role of government and society in cultivating these freedoms. Hobbes holds to freedom as the right to the simple preservation of one’s life, while Locke extends this idea to include the protection of liberty and property as well. J.S. Mill goes far beyond these two thinkers to include the freedom from the tyranny of the majority, and specifically, the oppression of tradition and culture.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This, the right of execution, is given up to the government in exchange for preservation of the other three natural rights. Hobbes views the state of nature as not a good place. He thinks of it as short and brutal. Weaker people can gain up on the stronger people. This makes everyone feel like they have a chance to get what they want.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes is a well renowned philosopher, specifically in the world of political philosophy. His work the Leviathan opened up revolutionary ideas that were beyond his time. Hobbes wrote the “Leviathan” during the English Civil War, a war caused by religion and violently ending with the beheading of the king. Hobbes watched this madness unfold, leading him to extend a “helping hand” over to England authority, by publicizing a solution for all to read. His work introduced a radical topic by the name of “Social Contract,” which proposed that a person’s morals and/or political obligations are dependent on an agreement to form or coexist in a society.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Folly Of Rebellion

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jaehun Lee 3/13/18 Hobbes Reflection Paper The Folly of Rebellion: What Hobbes Prescribes for Dissatisfaction with Trump There are always some who hold up rebellion as the harbinger of progress; Thomas Jefferson once called it “a medicine necessary for the sound health of government.” However, Thomas Hobbes and his followers would disagree with such a sentiment, arguing that rebellion is counteractive and only destabilizes the secure life we live. When applying Hobbes’s Leviathan to current events, his warning against rebellion is reaffirmed; thus, despite people’s dissatisfaction with Donald Trump, we recognize that the worst option is to rebel. First, Hobbes would argue that we have no reason to rebel because we gave Trump authority over…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society is a collection of individuals living in an ordered community that provides protection for all who reside in it. However, individuals do not directly consent to this system, but rather give tacit consent. As such, the question must be asked: “What was the period called before tacit consent was present in society?” Many political philosophers, such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau have called the period before society “the state of nature.”…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays