Social Strain Theory Analysis

Great Essays
Introduction:
The history of crime is as old as the history of human beings. Yet it is not possible to follow a single universal approach to encompass the whole idea of crime and the root cause behind it. Different causes lead to different kinds of criminal behaviors. Some people commit crime because they have no other means to satisfy their basic needs of life while others do it just because they are deviant genetically or socially. Whichever is the case, crime is a harmful act not only for an individual but for the state, society or a community. In order to maintain peace and justice in society, the state owns the power to deal with offender in ways defined by law of that specific state. But, history of crime shows that making more and more
…show more content…
The people, who are not able to communicate with society normally because of some mental illness, develop hatred for that society that leads to insanely violent criminal actions. Tom Phan analysis of reasons behind crimes shows that crime is somehow the response of social pressures and inequalities. The great philosopher Agnew has presented the same idea in 1985 in the form of general strain theory.

GENERAL STRAIN THEORY:
According to Agnew and the social strain theory, negative emotions develop as a result of social strains and may lead to a number of consequences that include delinquency as well. Strains are basically the pressures that people face while striving to survive in a society. For example
1. Failure to achieve the goals much valued in society (earning money and improving status)
2. Loss of some dear possession like death of some dear one, broken relationships or theft of some valuable.
3. Physically or mentally abused
Agnew tried to mention the conditions under which social strains can lead individuals to crime. According to his theory, strains that are 1) seen as unjust, 2) high in magnitude, 3) associated with low social control and 4) create some incentive to engage in criminal coping are most likely to lead to violence and delinquency. (Seepersad,
…show more content…
The most positively valued goal in modern world is money. When a person fails to earn enough money to fulfill his desires by legal means then he/she considers using illegal means and get involved in criminal activities. As mentioned by Tom Phan, this craving for more and more financial stability is the main cause behind crimes like embezzlement, identity theft, credit card frauds, property crimes, theft and burglary. It’s just not the lack of money that forces people to commit crimes, the never-satisfied nature of humans also plays the key role in defining their deviant behaviors. As power and status are the symbols of respect in society so people who are powerless try to gain power and people who are powerful use criminal means to gain more powers to maintain their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The upper class region may be disappointed or even appalled by the social customs of those in the lower class region, and the angst that arises from this situation combined with the desires for the lower class party to be more respected or even more integrated in the upper class party results in crime. Strain theory differs in this regard, as the theory focuses more on an individual attempting to reach the same goals as others in their society while not having the same means to get there. The desire to achieve goals without the education or work ethic that others may have can push an individual to crime, as while the path to success may be different, they view the end goal as having the same merit, and thus will incorporate them into greater society. The big difference between these theories is seen here; culture conflict theory emphasizes class differences and different understandings of what is acceptable, whereas strain theory emphasizes similarities over differences, and the differences are found in the achieving the same goals. Difference and similarity are the key words here, each holding importance within its respective theory and is a good indicator of the problems in society that are to thank for driving…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As with any theory, the strain theory draws great criticism. One of the major criticisms is the fact that the strain theory is based on weak empirical support. Scholars have argued that the strain theory was improperly measured suggesting that the main concept of the strain theory was improperly measured in previous research (Burton & Cullen, 1992). A criticism made by Bernard (1987), is that the strain theories do not predict relationships at the individual level between crime and frustration. The theory predicts a relationship between crime and characteristics associated with social structures; however, those social structural characteristics are not necessary to explain crime at the individual level. It is also argued that the theory only explains some types of crime and delinquency but not all (Bernard, 1987).…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Strain Theory is viable option to explain some of the actions taken by many during periods of hard times, especially in the Great Depression Era, where millions of people were losing everything. Due to the strain experienced because of the economic collapse put on their families, many individuals had turned to criminal behavior. Many of those who choose to engage in deviant…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Realism In Crime

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Studying crime is an interesting topic because there are so many theories surrounding why people commit crimes. Although there are several theories pertaining to crime, there are few that stand out when exploring criminal activities. Theories such as strain theory or differential association theory are based around a persons surroundings, that those surroundings are what causes them to commit crimes. Although these theories make extremely good arguments, they suggest that others are to blame for criminal activities and not the person who commits the crime. Realism however, looks at the individual who committed the crime as the person at fault. It was out of their free will and personal choice to commit the crime. This research paper will demonstrate…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merton that strain theory, and crime is not created by society alone. Agnew, and Merton differ in their definition of strain theory in two ways; one being that Agnew takes a more individualist approach to strain theory, and Merton takes a more society based approach to explain crime (AGNEW, 1997, Pg. 50, & Merton, 1938, Pg.672). Agnew argues that Merton definition of strain theory is not able to explain why only some individuals do to their strain turn to crime/delinquency, and also that Merton definition neglects every other aspect of strains other than monetary (AGNEW, 1997, Pg. 50). Agnew ideal of strain theory is that immediate goals such as educational goals should also be taken into consideration when looking at strains that cause individuals to commit crimes (AGNEW, 1997, Pg. 72). Also that bad influence/stimuli, removal of positive values, and failure to achieve positive goals all create a strain on the individuals that can lead him or her into delinquency (AGNEW, 1997, Pg. 72). Unlike Merton who blames society as creating goals for the individual as monetary only, and then almost entirely eliminating legitimate means to achieve those goals, Agnew argues that environment, immediate goals, failure to achieve goals, and bad influence/stimuli all effect whether a person will turn to delinquency and crime or not (AGNEW, 1997, Pg. 72, & Merton, 1938, Pg.672,675, &…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The parallels with the macrolevel of anomie and control theory were discussed in research conducted by Agnew and Passas. The two theorists highlighted that the microlevel theory should be separate from the control theory (Agnew and Passas, 1997). Dr. Agnew also made a connection with strain theory to both control theory and social learning theory (Agnew, 1992). These theories are very different because of the type of social associations that they covered and the motivations of which they were based on. Control theory is based on the idea that society’s failure makes room for people to commit crime. Whereas, strain theory is more fixated on the burden put on the individual, which is the reason they are lead to crime.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tough On Crime Essay

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Welch, 2011, the primary reasons that crime occurs, from a classical school of thought’s…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Child abuse and neglect, excessive physical punishment, negative relations among friends and negative school events can be the stimulation needed for prompting deviant behaviors. The general strain theory encompasses the belief that experiences and strains among the individuals life are why certain individuals become criminals. With this theory, criminals are not born but made. With the strain triggers, the general strain theory has been expanded to when criminal behavior will likely result from. Strains that are more likely to result in crime can be seen unjust which provokes anger, in high magnitude which generate more anger since one’s ability to cope in a nonviolent way is unsettled, associated in low social control formed from the labor market, and creation of pressure or incentive to engage in criminal coping (Riedel, Welsh, 2016). Related to Lopez’s case, consideration into the strains found from his result into gang membership began with the creation of incentive to engage in criminal coping from carrying on the family tradition within the gang. As time passed, his involvement in criminal behaviors stemmed from low social control due to little education and inability to find work. Lopez’s entire life was filled with strains dealing with different parts from family ties to gang…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agnew Concept Of Crime

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Agnew many concepts, also known as strains could lead towards someone committing a crime. 3 of the choices I will focus on are child abuse and neglect, homelessness, and marital problems. These 3 concepts all on their own can really drive someone towards commiting crime. But like every aspect of life all things have an opposite. Therefore I will discuss the negatative opposite of those 3 concepts. In this mini essay I will discuss both sides and justify why I picked those specific ones and how they will either prevent or cause crimes to occur.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    North Memphis Case Study

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The crime problem will never be achieved, but it can be controlled through punishment for breaking laws. The North Memphis District will possibly continue to experience ongoing crime because of the lack of funds the government fail to invest in the community, which can make it a better environment in Memphis. The Social Disorganization, Social Control, and Strain theory attempts to express why and how crime remains in certain societies and what steps should be taken to lessen criminal behavior. Therefore, patterns of crime in cultural occurrences can greatly affect all of the theories from group to group with societal context that include time and space (Porterfield,…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nobody fully knows why people commit crimes and negatively affect our society, but society can try to explain some reasons with sociological theories. People can look at three widely known Sociological theories of crime; Strain, social learning, and control theories. Each of these theories explain crime by using social environment such as, family, school, social groups (friends), workplace, community, and society. Each theory is similar but at the same time very different, each theory is different on how social environments cause crime, they take different parts of social environment, and some theories explain differences of the individual and others explain differences in social groups. Strain theory explains that individuals engage in crime because they are stressed or strained. Social learning theory argues that individuals learn through the people they most closely associate with. Control theory is different than the others because instead of asking why people commit crime they ask why people do not commit crime. Control theorist argue that it is easy to commit a crime and get what you want so it’s about people’s relationships and what they have learned that proves whether they have control or not. All of these theories attempt to explain the social causes of crime and with these theories people can try to solve problems in our society so that we can lower the crime rate and create a safer environment for everyone.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In reading 15, Physical Deterioration, Disorder, and Crime, O’Shea studies Wilson and Kelling’s the broken window theory of crime. The broken window theory states that social control and disorder can influence the people of a social disorganized neighborhood to not commit serious crimes. O’Shea raises an argument that the relationship between physical deterioration, disorder, and crime are not straightforward or additive. Rather physical deterioration interacts with social disorder to affect levels of crime. O’Shea states that crime and disorder are not randomly distributed but found in clusters. Sociologist found that crime and placement is related and that crime is found in certain geographic areas, and that the cause of crime is related to various social conditions such as single parent families, low education,…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This concept believes the gap between resources to obtain accepted norms and values is what generates the increase in criminal behavior. The theory associates with disintegration in schools because if resources are limited, the chance of falling out of the conformist or ritualist category can greatly increase. This can lead to adolescents wanting to rebel against society’s values and customs, and find their own way to prosperity. Usually rebelling against society’s normality to gain wealth leads to illegal activity. The strain theory is most likely to develop if disintegration takes…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They both unswervingly weigh the most significant influences that serve as causations for participation in illicit activities. The Social Disorganization Theory concludes that “crime is largely a product of unfavorable conditions in certain communities” (Gaines and Miller 43). This can be applied directly to criminal justice due to the realization that a large sector of criminals are not inherently bad people. Rather, they are morally equal to any individual, but were simply victims of their environment. If someone is constantly emerged in an atmosphere where horrendous activities are deemed acceptable or even admirable, they are significantly more likely to succumb to similar opportunities. The Strain Theory is similarly effective as it concludes that the yearning for monetary success is to blame as the most significant factor contributing to the commitment of crime. Money as the motive applies to the criminal justice system in many investigations where they are searching for a motive that may lead them to capturing a criminal. Wholly, both theories are tremendously useful in terms of understanding crime in regards to criminal…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many unique theories as to why humans commit crime, engage with others in crime, and are lured or motivated by a criminal lifestyle. By studying these theories, one is afforded a chance to develop and then test potential solutions to this enormous social problem that has afflicted humanity since the beginning of time. The various ways of deterring, controlling, preventing, and punishing crime throughout history has changed drastically. Attempting to attack the problem of crime head on, has not worked; so developing different ways to learn why, adapt, and address the root causes of crime is the current strategy. One very important point is that the structural frameworks and contributions from both classical school of…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics