The Stop-And-Frisk Policy Of The New York Police Department

Improved Essays
The policy that the New York Police Department has is questionable, with the information that given in the article. The article states, "The stop-and-frisk policy -- in which police stop, question and frisk people they deem suspicious, even if they've committed no crime -- has been one of the most controversial policing techniques in recent time, fueled by clashes between civil rights and civil liberties groups challenging the practice as racist and illegal" (Boyette & Martinez, 2013, p.1). I do not agree with this policy. This policy is very broad and does give officers enough teeth when dealing with the public. General policies are lawsuits waiting to happen. When examining this particular policy, and making a justified argument, you must

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The reason for saying this is because it is simply racist the fact that most stops conducted have been and should be on black and/or Hispanic people. I find it great that law enforcement officials conduct stops on people that seem suspicious, but not just focus on black and Hispanic people and especially those that are not suspicious of anything. I believe that instead of decreasing crime in New York City the only thing that this policy has been doing and will continue doing is creating anger and more crime. Moreover, there are no difference in the formulas, because the intention to still stop black and Hispanic people is still happening and it should not be this way, but sadly it is. All in all, every person regardless of their race should be stop if found…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    About Stop, Question, and Frisk Stop, question, and frisk (SQF) is a tactics used in New York City by police officers to help lower crime rates. This tactic entails police officers to stop any suspicious person on the streets if they have reasonable suspicion about a crime that happened, is happening, or is about to happen and question the suspect. If the officer believes the suspect is armed and dangerous, they have the authority the do a quick pat-down of the suspect’s outer clothing to see if they have any weapons on them; this is known as frisking. “From the perspective of New York City police officials, these stops are essential to maintaining public safety. From the perspective of many citizens who are stopped by officers, the encounters…

    • 1276 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop and Frisk states that police is able to stop and search someone based on a suspicion that this person is involved in criminal activity. The 4th amendment states that police is allowed to search someone if they have the reasonable believe that this person is committing, has committed or is going to commit a crime. This search consists of a quick pat down of the outer clothing. Stop and Frisk started with the Terry vs. Ohio case, in 1976, in which a police officer suspected three men of being about to commit a crime. The officer pointed his gun at them in order to search them.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cops are exploiting our weak laws against it. The #BlackLivesMatter movement has sparked nationwide protests and has raised awareness worldwide about the unequal treatment of black people by police in the United States. “ Racial profiling — as well as profiling based on religion, ethnicity and national origin — continues to plague our nation despite the constitutional guarantee of equal treatment under the law”("Racial…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Essay

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop-and-Frisk Policy Review According to the Washington Post article “Here’s what you need to know about stop and frisk — and why the courts shut it down” by Dylan Matthews, Stop and Frisk is “an NYPD policy wherein police will detain and question pedestrians, and potentially search them, if they have a reasonable suspicion that the pedestrian in question committed, is committing, or is about to commit a felony or a Penal Law misdemeanor” (Matthews). This means that if a person appears suspicious of having commit or being about to commit a crime according to a police officer then that police officer has the right to question, search and detain this particular individual. This seems like something that would benefit society, preventing crime and ridding society of wrongdoers. However, there are serious issues with this policy.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Analysis

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The implementation tactics of the stop and frisk policy is racially discriminatory because the number of members of the minority group stopped by a police exceeded the number of whites. Racially discriminatory enforcement of the stop and frisk policy is also a risk factor for the well-being of the society as it promotes prejudice against a certain group of individuals within the criminal justice system. As Gelam et al. (2007) raised the issue of geographic heterogeneity that was found in their analysis of stop-and-frisk. They questioned the legitimacy of the criteria the police used for determination before a stop that caused unjustified disparate impact among the racial demographic of the stop-and-frisk.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is just a form of racial profiling because over half the percent of people they stop are African Americans. We are suspected to have some form of a weapon on contraband, or us and if it just happened that someone they stopped and frisked did they would get charged. In these cases whites never seem to cause suspicious among cops. It is easier for police to just be able to go into urban areas and criminalize the people there because it is cheaper for their police force than to go into suburban areas where there can be drugs or contraband inside of there houses and having to look into many of the crimes police would need a search warrant because the crimes in these areas are typically done behind closed doors. Because we look suspicious to a specific police officer they take this as an advantage and use this as a style of policing it gives them to right to just stop and search me as If I was a criminal.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop and frisk is an unjust crime prevention that gives permission to provided police officers to stop a person and frisk them based on “reasonable suspicions” of possible criminal activities. Although nowadays it seems to be a way for police officers to harass people on the street specifically minorities. From this program, minorities experienced police interrogations, physical assault, and even arrests, only to establish innocence in court. Despite being declared unconstitutional in 2013, there’s an ongoing discussion in the news to bring it back and not just in New York but in other major cities as well. Stop and frisk is a prejudiced program that should not be reinstituted in America.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Racial Police Profiling

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Research Design (how you will collect your data): First I would define racial police profiling. Then I would collect data from police departments, data from police car stops to investigate the issue of racial profiling, conduct a comparison between each race and how many times they’ve been stopped, see if there are any patterns in the police stops, also check with the complaints from the citizens that were filed. I would also use the most recent racial profiling data from the internet for large cities. I would also need information of complaints from citizens saying they’ve had an experience with racist police officers. I would look into any policies or incentives that promote higher arrest rates, fine rates, or other enforcement tactics.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One very contradictory issue that has emerged over the recent years within community policing is racial profiling. Racial profiling is defined as the use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense. Profiling of this nature impacts communities, minority groups, and even policing agencies in a negative manner ultimately. Many argue that criminal profiling differs from racial profiling and is a vital part of the job therefore it must be done. Others argue that it is not as great of a problem as the media sometimes portrays it to be.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The only reason why people are against “stop and frisk” is because the people believe that it’s unconstitutional. They think that “stop and frisk” is an invasion of privacy, which could be true, but the Second Court of Appeals decision said that stop and frisk is constitutional and plays a critical role in saving lives…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Stop And Frisk

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stop and Frisk has been complained numerous times as racial profiling towards minorities in these type of communities. A U.S. District Court judge of south of New York, Shira Scheindlin, said that the Fourteenth Amendment was not being enforced as there isn’t equal protection to black and latinos, as they are searched more by the police than white people (Washington Post). This very compelling because a U.S. District Court judge is saying this, yet there has not been any real changes to the Stop and Frisk system. Also, considering how high of a position this judge has, she is able to see the ins and outs of the law, and she is able to determine that there is discrimination and targeting towards minorities. Furthermore, in the Washington Post article, it has a graph in which it shows that black and hispanic people are stopped more by the police, even though there is a higher population of white people.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Issues Relating to Racial Profiling in Law Enforcement Law enforcement officers often use the term profiling, which refers to a practice of describing individual behavior (positive or negative) and/or certain personal characteristics. At some point in time, the term profiling has evolved from its original specific intent and shifted from an individual’s actions to the individual’s race, ethnicity or national origin of an individual. Many individuals have seen law enforcement officers from interstate highways to airports describe an individual criminal behavior based on race. In the United States, racial profiling has been used as a way to stereotype an individual or groups solely on race and/or even on the person’s negative behavior still…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Racial profiling has connections in law enforcement and the community causing biased factors in which can result in problematic factors on both sides. In law enforcement each individual officer to have their own part of racism. There has been arguments throughout the media and articles complaining their own side of the story of how an individual being the opposite race to the officer has been treated poorly and severely. Racial profiling is not something new that is happening now thus, it has been around since the early 1700s. Not only is this making law enforcement look bad but, for a community to not have a relationship to an officer again within the help for a community.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays