Avoiding Corruption In John Locke's Society

Improved Essays
Locke believes that the correct way to avoid corruption is the Legislative Branch and what it implies. In Locke’s society, he believes people should trust the government and the government should obtain the trust of the people by taking concern in their opinions. Locke believes that the Legislative branch will help people make educated decisions that include the concern of the people. That the legislative branch should not be the only power, but that it should have rules and laws to follow so it can keep the society safe. All of this is to avoid a government being dissolved, but if so, overthrowing that government is acceptable, as long as it is for the benefit of the society. The Legislative Branch is the supreme power in Locke’s mind, as he believes it will keep the society from corruption.
The rules for Locke’s society relate to trusteeship and accepting the decisions of society, and as the people do this they will establish and put trust in the legislative power, as the laws require. Locke says,
…show more content…
Copleston writes, “governments are dissolved when the prince or the legislative act in a manner contrary to their trust, as when either of them invades the property of citizens or tries to obtain arbitrary dominion over their lives, liberties, or property. When government is ‘dissolved’ in any of these ways, rebellion is justified”(Copleston,138).If the trust of the society is ruined by the government, then it is acceptable for that government to be overthrown, according to Locke. When a government is dissolved from within and becomes corrupt, the people should do whatever it takes to gain back peace, including overthrowing the government. If the society is no longer safe and secure due to the government 's corruption, Locke believes rebellion is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When Citizens understand the significance of laws to their common good, they will start to respect them and act accordingly to their duties. Rousseau further on claims that in order for the social contract to be successful, citizens must love their duties. It’s not enough to be virtuous but it’s very important to love and respect our duty toward the state. “But when citizens love their…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And if a government could perform their role in protecting people’s right, no harm should occur to such a society. Civil disobedience is a political act that should be exercised with a good aim to fight for public goods. It’s also crucial to be peaceful and non-violent. Civil disobedience exposes society to harm. It may encourage disrespect towards legal system, it could paralyze financial development and interfere with people’s daily living.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He wanted to show the importance of supply and demand and how it was important to profit. The government Smith would be most accustomed to is John Locke’s ideal government. Locke had a supply, the natural rights of the people, and a demand, the government that all of the citizens accepted. The profit that comes from that supply and demand is the striving society. Locke believed that the government should be in the favor of the people, and according the Smith, the government should stay away from business affairs, which is in the favor of the people.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first step in this principle is to figure out intentions and the company did believe that they have good intentions of protecting the company. Even though the secrets they are keeping are illegal the company believed they were helping by protecting those secrets and employees. The second step of this principle is to look at all available options. This is where the wiring of houses takes an ethical downturn. The company should have found a more ethical way to make sure the company’s secrets are safe.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville, both were advocates for individual freedom, and liberty through democracy. Mill and Tocqueville both feared tyranny, and promoted democracy so that citizens could have individual liberties, and thoughts. Mill’s ideal citizen in a democracy would be participatory, and opinionated in their beliefs. His citizen would not curtail any other citizen’s belief, no matter how far off of their beliefs it is. Tocqueville’s ideal citizen would be one who participates at a local level of politics.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    70). This “social contract” would obviously be followed since no one would want to live in a world of selfishness forever, therefore Hobbes suggested the people create an absolute monarch, to ensure the safety of all. Abiding to the social contract would eventually lead to mutual transferring, which ensured that, “... he that promises only, because he has already received the benefits for which he has promises, is to be understood as if he intended the right should pass…” (Ball et al. 75). Hobbes concluded that if society followed what he proposed, then society would stay away from civil war and live in peace.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While he acknowledges the importance of liberty, he believes that people should entrust authorities entirely with the judgment. What is more, people have to obey the judgment of the magistrate as they are driven by the good of public welfare, not by self interest. The ruler, however, has to be wise and impartial. Only then the judgment can be fair and just. Locke does not hide his distrust with masses as he believes that it is much better to put the power in the hands of a small group or individual rather than the whole community.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    POT3302 POT 3303 Political Ideologies John Locke’s vision of individual rights, rights of rebellion The scholar John Locke opines that a government bears the mandate to serves its people by protecting their life, liberty and their property. In his view, governments should not endorse the tyrannical rule of law; instead, the dispersion of authority should include excising the rule of law that serves all people (Aaron, 2011). Thus, he supports the decision to protest or rebel against any form of government that violates individual rights. In his view, the protests or rebels are justly before any legal presentation. Locke vouches for thinkers of liberty with individual example cases like Thomas Jefferson and Algernon Sidney.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When one is obedient and is submissive to the policies promulgated, the law must apply. If one is behaving like a brute, stringent discipline must be made in order to inflict fear and reverence. Likewise, Machiavelli believes that when a ruler gains the trust and love of the people, it is expected that the latter will support him and his end for the advancement of the good of the society. This is how a person maintains political power. However, Locke criticizes Machiavelli’s work.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confucius taught on an ideal ruler for the process of government. This ruler would be superior in their integrity and morality, and would be an example to others, in order to cultivate their own morality. A good ruler would seek to correct his subjects with love and concern rather than punishment and coercion. Furthermore, he explained that traditions were more important in molding the ideals of the people, rather than laws. He even put forth, “If the people be led by laws, and uniformity among them be sought by punishments, they will try to escape punishment and have no sense of shame.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays