What Is John Locke's State Of Nature

Improved Essays
1. John Locke describes the “state of Nature” as total freedom. He says that people have the power to control their actions and get rid of their possessions or people as they please. In the “state of Nature” people don’t have to depend on another person and all people are equal. This state has its own law of Nature to govern it and the people are supposed to abide by it. The law states that a person shouldn’t harm another person, their possession or their freedoms. Everyone has the instinct to protect him or her self and the right to dole out punishment as they see fit when one breaks one of the laws of Nature.
2. People often abandon this “state of Nature” giving up their “perfect freedom” in order to protect them. All people have their own
…show more content…
“all this to be directed to no other end but the peace, safety, and public good of the people” “The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations”
“this(natural rights being protected) makes them so willingly give up every one of his single power of punishing to be exercised by such alone as shall be appointed to it amongst them… authorized by them to that purpose, shall agree on” “Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
…show more content…
In “The Federalist Papers, Nº.10” the focal discussion was on factions needing to be unionized: being a necessary for society, how to control the factions without taking away the citizen’s liberties, and the solution for any mischief to arise. James Madison describes the reason for coming together to form a faction as the behavior that is “…sown in the nature of man” that can be seen anywhere when “…brought into different degrees of activity, according to the different circumstances of civil society.” Human passion is what divides mankind into groups.
(2-5 James Madison; completed by Jeremiah Smith)
2. Madison feels factions are a danger to the minority group, for they come under the threat of an "overbearing majority." He feels that "the rules of justice" often become ignored in favor of a "superior force" that leads to injustice after injustice.

3. James Madison offers 2 methods by which factions can be dealt with: dealing with the aftermath or removing their cause. He also further states 2 ways to remove their causes. One by "destroying the liberty" or giving "every citizen" the same motivation and thus making the majority the only faction, creating a unified

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    of C.’s lack of authority (which is necessary when running a government to some degree) James Madison expresses that just because one certain state does not side with the majority it has delayed the reformation of a more efficient government. (Doc. A) This shows how incapable the A. of C. was at the time unlike the constitution which only requires a ⅔ vote to pass an amendment.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the summer of 1787, the United States was challenged to create a stronger central government without letting one person or group have too much power. There were flaws in the Articles of Confederation and the government wasn’t getting anything done. The fifty-five representatives wanted to create a Constitution that divided up powers to avoid the tyranny that they escaped from by becoming an independent nation. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in many ways, such as Federalism, creating equality for big and small states, separation of powers by creation of branches, and checks and balance between the branches.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalist Paper number ten was written by James Madison to guard against the issues of factions. In any society there will be factions, people with different ideals, religions, and points of view. In a republic this creates the problem of the mob rule, where only to opinion of the majority matters and the rights of the smaller groups are not protected. This is similar to Federalist Paper number nine in which he addressed the destructive role of a faction in breaking apart the republic.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison wanted to due away with the idea of a Pure Democracy because of the accepted idea that democracies inevitably dissolved because of factions. Factions commonly work against public interest and infringe on the rights of others. A common faction many officials worried about when creating a new governing document was the “various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society.” , as stated in the PowerPoint “Understanding Federalist…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist No. 10 responds to the Antifederalists argument that a “large republic” cannot long survive. Madison set out the task of devising a republic in which a majority of citizens will be unable to tyrannize the minority. Madison says the rotten apple is factions. Factions are defined as a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The creation of a republic serves as a control for the effects of factions. Factions emerge when groups of people feel their ideas are not being heard and accounted for in government. Madison describes these groups as having interests against the interests of the whole country. The design of a republic, especially the one created in the Constitution, encourages representatives from various interest groups to have a voice in lawmaking. Therefore, controlling factions is a matter of having elected officials to represent different groups.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, Madison also is keen to promote the unity of the United States of America. The Federalist publications, after all, were the means to an end of gaining support for the ratification of the constitution which proposed a centralized, or Federal, government. Madison exemplifies the glory of a republic, on the size of the United States, when he goes to say, “Hence, it clearly appears that the same advantage which a republic has over a democracy, in controlling the effects of faction, is enjoyed by a large over a small republic.” (Great Documents 41). After this new republic has been practiced for eight years under Washington, one could say that it appeared to be justly unifying.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the pseudonym Publius, James Madison wrote Federalist Paper #10 to try to encourage the state governments to ratify the constitution. In this essay, Madison argued that a Republic, specifically the Republic proposed within the Constitution, would provide the perfect balance between the rights of the citizens and national security. In a direct democracy, there are no checks in place to ensure that the government is functioning as it should. A few dissenters can gather a following and cause problems within the government. This type of government, according to Madison, gives the people too much power and subsequently fails to effectively maintain social order.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Critique of Fiorina’s “The Decline of Collective Responsibility in American Politics” In the early 1980s, political scientists were studying the changing status of American political parties (Fiorina 1981). During this time, Morris P. Fiorina wrote his essay to address these findings, most notably what he believes to be the decline of political parties. Fiorina concludes that strong political parties provide electoral accountability and discipline in government and keep the system afloat. Without it, the consequences are dire.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first chapter of William E. Hudson’s book American Democracy in Peril, Hudson discusses the reasoning and application of the separation of powers stemmed from the Constitution, and the impact it has had as well as the failures that came as a consequence of it. Due to the changing meaning of the Jeffersonian model, one of the failures Hudson argues is that the separation of powers in a partisan, party-based system falls apart once both parties are to blame. It is also argued that the same system creates a political minority “biased against change” to protect against the supposed tyranny of the majority. Hudson ends by making a case in favor of a change in government towards the form of a parliament for the sake of accountability and protection…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Founding Fathers Problems

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    a majority would be the most dangerous of all factions that might arise, for the majority would be the most capable of gaining complete ascendancy.” (Page 11) To combat a situation like this, the Founding Fathers wanted a federal government with a stronghold on all states. This would make the country stronger as a unit. If a problem sprang up in a certain area, those people don’t have to deal with it alone.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antigone Case Study

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Furthermore, he argues that “the only way to erect such a Common Power… Is to conferre all their power and strength upon one Man, or upon one Assembly of men, that may reduce their Wills, by plurality of voices, unto one Will,”…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was the first necessary step in proving that America was capable of managing freedom and democracy. They viewed America as an ever-expanding territory that could only survive given a balanced federal government. As the excerpt from James Madison’s public defense of the Constitution states, many foreign governments at the time refused to engage in treaties with America and did not hold the country in high respect because of the ongoing strife between the government and it’s people. Madison argued that ratifying the Constitution would eliminate much of the disunity between the states and would create trust between the general and individual government. He also emphasized the proposal of a three-fourths consensual agreement policy when ratifying new amendments.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    10 and No. 51 assume that it is in our human nature to be selfish. In Federalist Paper No. 51, Madison states that factions will always exist. The only way to prevent a faction from being too powerful is to have numerous factions competing with one another. Democracy and self­interest creates factions. Federalist Paper No. 10 gives specific ways to eliminate the negative effects that factions create.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Violence as seen in many communities is a very debated topic. The question most discussed tends to be when it’s okay to use violence against another individual. In terms of John Locke, in the absence of government in a civic society one has every right to use violence as self defense to protect their life, liberty and estates; any aggression towards another person is a challenge of the victims’ freedom whether there be a common judge or not. Even in a state of nature, rights still exist and take president since everyone is free, equal and has a right to private property. In a state of nature when self interest, bias and revenge are present each can lead to a state of war.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays