Thomas Hobbes The Citizens Analysis

Improved Essays
Thomas Hobbes, a political philosopher who established the social contract theory and became a foundation in Western political philosophy. When presented this claim: "The more equal people are, the easier it is for them to live in peace. If people were perfectly equal, there would be no more wars.", Hobbes response to this assertion would have been rejection, according to his book; The Citizens. He would be at this conclusion because he does not think humans should live in equality. He believes that humans should strive for peace above all things but war is nessesary when lives are threatened. Hobbes does claim that humans in the state of nature are all equals.
The state of nature is what Hobbes decribes as a place without any government and caotic. Naturally men exist in a state of equality, where everyone is for themselves. Hobbes believed that men are equal as a whole but not as individuals. Not in nature but in society, men are contained by laws of the government. Does not matter of physical or mental ability, everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed, which is Hobbes’ view of equality of men. Men cannot possibly have equal power in society, “…if all men have it, no man hath it, for theyconsist in comparison and excellence; neither doth the society of others advance any whit
…show more content…
Wherefore to seek peace, where there is any hopes of obtaining it, and where there is none, to enquire out for auxiliaries of war, is the dictate of right reason; that is, the law of nature,.” [CITIZEN] Power cannot be distributed evenly because then we would not have a society, only in nature people are equal. Though that peace should always be welcomed, Hobbes do state that war is necessary when to defend and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There would be no higher power to enforce laws, punishments or settle any disputes. Hobbes describes that living in a State of Nature would be the downfall of civilized life. Men would all be equal, but at what cost? A common wealth is established when men vote or agree to give up rights to all things and transfer them to a soverign, or an assembly of men to have absolute control.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I disagree with that, I think that having equal opportunities will create peace and not conflict because people will have nothing, in terms of being equal, to fight about. People might fight just simply because they are humans but not because they are equal and have equal opportunities. Moreover, I believe that Hobbes’s first law of nature is somewhat realistic because I think that one should always be peaceful and try to solve any problem with peace. However, when the argument or problem is not solved, one should be ready to endure anything and be ready to defend one’s self. I also believe that Hobbes’s second law of nature is not impossible.…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed peace is the norm, and should be the norm. We can and should live together in peace by refraining from molesting each other’s property and persons, and for the most part we do. While Hobbes believed men cannot know good and evil, and in consequence can only live in peace together by subjection to the absolute power of a common master, and therefore there can be no peace between kings. Peace between states is merely war by other means. Furthermore, the stand on the social contract is different in Locke and Hobbes’ philosophies.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though he did not define human nature in any way, Confucius said that all human beings are equal. Confucius’ theory would be valid if he had explained more about his beliefs and included everyone in them. The Analects are based on humanism, not metaphysics. Confucius was more worried about the basic human welfare and not so much the ultimate nature of the world. He was concerned on a better government that would help the well-being of the common people that would bring peace among the citizens.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The right of nature is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life.”-Thomas Hobbes… Two strong-minded social contract theorists concluded two different outlooks on several different topics, one main topic being the state of nature. John Locke feels as if peace is and should be the norm, we can and should be able to live in peace without having to worry about someone fondling with our property or belongings. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, feels like everyone isn’t going to agree that certain things are good or bad because that’s based on opinion. However, yes men can live together in peace but only with the use of a common master with a higher…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes ascribes the immutability of natural law to the existence of justice. While men live outside the social contract, nothing can be unjust, because they ignore natural laws. When men live inside the social contract, they live in accordance with natural laws. Machiavelli’s insistence that men should always conquer, because it is a natural thing leaves no room for natural law. Machiavelli’s rejection of natural law destroys the foundation for justice.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    And following this is a second law. When others are willing, a man shouldn't limit his liberty against other man, again, in his words, as he would allow other men against himself in order to promote peace and self-preservation. But Hobbes accepted these natural laws were not going to be effective in the state of nature. And, thus, he argued we would agree to establish a state that would govern over us. So to create a government, everyone must agree to pass on their rights to absolute liberty to a sovereign or a state.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘Cosmopolitan Right shall be limited to Conditions of Universal Hospitality’ (ibid., p. 105). This is a universal right for all men of the world to be treated kindly when they arrive at other states. An individual can be denied entry into a host state however, he must not be treated harshly as long as his law abiding. Kant believes that the earth belongs to the human race and no one should claim possession of any part of it. From this we can draw that the treatment of refugees in the ongoing migrant crisis in Europe by the Hungarian government is immoral.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I view everyone as equal and that social statuses don’t matter. To bring order, the government has to be equal and fair to everyone. On the contrary, no government is perfect. There will always be chaos, seeing that you can’t make everyone happy since we all have different views. I agree with John Locks political ideas for starting a government.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The social contract was then put in place to secure man’s need for protection. Hobbes believed that the social contract was a “compact between the subject to obey the sovereign” (Montmorency 53). The problem with Hobbes’ theory starts with his belief that all humans are inherently selfish. He believes that people only work for their best interests, however, he also says that they have the rational capacity to create the best means to the end they want (Friend). He argues that man would choose to give up all of their natural rights because they believe that it is their best option for self-preservation.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays