The Stanford Prison Experiment: History Of Social Psychology

Improved Essays
The Stanford Prison Experiment was a proposed two-week experiment that turned into a six day nightmare. “The original intent was to study whether the behavior of prisoners and guards was dispositional or situational” (McLeod, 2008). However, what they got out of the experiment was a “situation in which prisoners were withdrawing and behaving in pathological ways” and where some of the guards “were behaving sadistically” (Zimbardo). The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most controversial studies ever conducted in the “history of social psychology” (Konnikova, 2015). The results of this experiment show the truth of how absolute power corrupts absolutely, why good people do bad things, and how it can be applied to real life situations (Dalberg-Acton).
One early Sunday morning in Palo Alto, California, a police car “swept through the town” and arrested college students as part of a mass arrest. The suspect was then taken to the Palo Alto station, formally booked, reminded of his rights, and then blindfolded. The “prisoner” was then transported to the “Stanford County Jail,” A.K.A. the basement of the psychology
…show more content…
The prisoners removed their caps, ripped the numbers off their uniforms, and barricaded themselves inside their cells. The guards were frustrated, and when the morning shift arrived, they became upset at the night shift, for they felt that the night shift had been too lenient. Reinforcements were called in, and the three guards who were on standby came in and the night shift stayed in to bolster the morning shift. The guards then decided to meet force with force. They got a fire extinguisher and forced the prisoners away from the doors. The guards then broke into the cells, stripped each prisoner, took the beds out, and forced the ringleaders into solitary confinement. And thus the harassment and intimidation

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Review of the Stanford Prison Experiment By Andrew Scudder PSYC 1111 In the Stanford Prison Experiment, the general idea was that prisons do not work when it comes to the rehabilitation of inmates. On the contrary, prisons only succeed in the further distancing of those incarcerated and those in charge of upholding the law. Once a prisoner has served their time, they are more likely to commit another crime. The Stanford Prison Experiment suggests that the relationship between guard and prisoner is one of the reasons for this lack of rehabilitation.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The structure of a society is essential in distinguishing the norms and values that will undergo in that environment. Mike Rolland’s book, “Descent into Madness: An Inmate’s Experience of the New Mexico State Prison Riot,” includes the account of inmates and correctional officers that were involved in the 1980 riot at the New Mexico Penitentiary (PNM) and the events that led to such violence. Mark Colvin, a sociology professor in the Department of Justice Studies at Kent State University, was hired as a part of a team who investigated witnesses about the event. Prison riots often involve violence taken against the officers and sheriffs; however, the incident of 1980 at the PNM had a significant amount of deaths, all of which were between inmates and not officers. Colvin’s investigated the history and social…

    • 2433 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo built a mock prison in the basement of the psychology building at Standard University while the Abu Ghraib prison scandal took place in a real prison in Iraq. Also, Zimbardo randomly collected volunteer college-aged men for the experiment while Szegedy-Maszak cites the prison was staffed by American military guards over Iraqi detainees. Zimbardo claims validly in his conclusion that if the mock prison environment instigates irrational pressures to change the “elite” guards radically in a short period of time, it could happen to anybody (Zimbardo 116). Melissa Dittmann would logically agree because she presents that the average individual desires to be the “good apple” and can overcome any situation; however, “people can be influenced, regardless of their intention to resist” (Dittmann 1). William Saletan, writer for Slate Magazine, introduces an entirely new concept to the evidences that separates the articles.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, many controversial psychology experiments were lead by brilliant psychologists to study human behaviour in different situations. Many of them are known, like the “Obedience to Authority Experiment”, lead by psychologist Stanley Milgram. One of the most notorious experiments in the history of psychology is the “ Stanford Prison Experiment ” put together by psychologist Philip Zimbardo, whose intention was to study the psychological effect of human behaviour when good people are put in an evil place. Can the situation around an individual control his behaviour or can his values or morality allow him to rise above in a negative environment? The results can be very astonishing.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the summer of 1971, Dr. Zimbardo designed and conducted an experiment that would forever change the way that sociologists and psychologists viewed human nature and how environmental circumstances can change a person’s psyche. While the experiment was designed to last two weeks, it had to be terminated after the sixth day due to the rapid increase of abuse against the prisoners by the guards. Though it is now considered extremely unethical by society’s standards today, The Stanford Prison Experiment gave scientists invaluable data on how total authority dominates over a person’s ability to reason and empathize with others. The experiment itself was designed to test if the conflicts within the prison system were caused by individual psychological…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Report on the Stanford Prison Experiment for PSYC 1111 The Office of Naval Research sponsored a study at Stanford University to "develop a better understanding of the basic psychological mechanisms underlying human aggression" and to identify which conditions can lead to aggression when men are living in close quarters for a long period of time (Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973)). This experiment took form within a model prison created in the basement at Stanford University to discover the variables found in prisons that can lead to aggression in people, i.e. guards and prisoners. The hypothesis explored was that ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’ would react in different ways and their behavior and state of being would differ from each…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They had had large glum metal doors that secured the premises with guards only allowing the prisoners in for their sentence. I heard a loud beep sound as they opened the gates to allow…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negative situations can become so manipulative that they affect the individual. According to the “Stanford Prison Experiment” article, “The research suggests that situational variables have a stronger sway than personality factors in determining obedience” (“More Information Frequently Asked Questions”). The prisoners were kept in the prison all day. The situation that the guards were but in changed their behavior from students to brutal human beings. The prisoners were able to leave the experiment whenever they pleased.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They began tormenting the prisoners, subjecting them to humiliating tasks, as well as verbal and physical punishments. The abuse quickly became so severe that Zimbardo prematurely terminated the study after only six days. The Stanford Prison experiment exemplifies how, given unrestrained power and with the group dynamics of groupthink and group polarization at play, good men can be lead to commit evil actions very…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards? The good guards were unable to object or countermand the bad guards because of the fear of what it would do to the guards’ authoritative role in the eyes of the prisoners. If they showed disunity as guards the prisoners could take advantage of the unstructured and create chaos within the walls of the prison. By objecting to the bad guards, they take the risk of the prisoners not taking the guards orders seriously.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971, a mock prison was built in the basement of the psychology building of Stanford University. About twenty-four male students were randomly picked to play the role of either a prisoner or a guard for two weeks. Prisoners were treated like every other criminal, being arrested at their own homes, without warning, and being taken away. When the prisoners arrived at the prison they were stripped naked, lost all their personal possessions, were removed from the area in prison and then locked away.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Does giving one person more power than another really change the way that they will react in a certain situation? Do certain circumstances cause a different reaction in different people? That was the question for the Stanford Prison Experiment performed by Phil Zimbardo in 1971. In an attempt to show what life was like to be in prison, the inmates and guards of Stanford County Jail, were placed in an almost inhumane setting. The tyranny of the men in charge, along with the abuse of the inmates, goes to show how people that are placed in an environment and told to play roles that they are not necessarily familiar with, can go wrong.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mind Tyrant Analysis

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the “Stanford Prison Study,” students were affected by institutional forces of the prison system. Even though all students were of healthy, normal and stable mental capacities, they took to the roles “inmate” and “guard” without prejudice. The inmates became disturbed, but more surprising is how the guards became violent and brutal, inflicting physical force and harassment. Outside the experiment, students wouldn’t have forced an individual to do something against their will.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by researcher, Philip Zimbardo is one of the most eye-opening social studies done to this day. It’s purpose was to find out more about how the social principles of obedience and conformity can affect the behavior of a normal human being. Zimbardo wanted to discover how social customs and hierarchy affect the roles people play, in a prison setting (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Though their purpose seems praiseworthy, the experiment itself was not. It was filled with ethical violations and in just 6 days, spun out of control (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays