Soveraigne's Struggle To Gain Peace

Improved Essays
The life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short. This outcome is not what man wants out of life. He wants power and the ability to achieve his appetites and avoid his aversions. This holds true for the man next to him as well and there is no guarantee that man will not kill one another in the natural state of things in order to follow his appetites and aversions. This is why government was created. Man chose to create government to ensure self-protection; he gave up his power and rights to a Soveraigne to keep from dying by the hands of another man.
The fear of death is the foundation for man’s creation of government. In a natural state of nature there is nothing to stop one man from killing another and man does not know when or if this will occur; the probability of it happening is high. To ensure
…show more content…
The Soveraigne is how man achieves peace. The need to achieve Peace comes from the First Law of Nature which states “That every man, ought to endeavour Peace, as farre as he has hope of obtaining it; and when he cannot obtain it, that he may seek, and use, all helps and advantages of Warre. The first branch of which Rule, containeth the first, and Fundamental Law of Nature; which is, to seek Peace, and follow it” (Chapter 14 Section “The Fundamentall Law of Nature”). However man is in a constant state of warre and requires this is why he requires third party (the Soveraigne) to intervene to achieve peace. This is a difficult balance to achieve because man must relinquish all power to the Soveraigne. The citizens cannot only submit a portion of their power and keep some for themselves. Man desires power and to give all of it up is a difficult task but man must value his survival and peace more than his need for power. Without all of the power of the citizens the Soveraigne cannot conduct his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jonah Goldberg is the editor of National Review Online and author of The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas. He takes the standpoint in favor of the death penalty and that those who oppose it, whatever the intention, cannot hold against the argument. A minor point of his would be that opponents tend to avoid cases where the audience would not sympathize with their argument. After reading his article “Why Death Penalty Opponents Can’t Win,” I agree with his opinion because it deters crime, there are cases where uncertainty is not an issue, and it is just to execute a criminal who deserves to be executed. It is difficult to defend politically the death penalty in a country where thirty-one out of fifty states favor it.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an excerpt from Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes, he describes his theory about the conditions of a society which has no governing body to control it. When there is no government, we live in a state of nature; a state of total freedom where we can do whatever we want at any time. If there is no government, there are no set laws, and therefore no limits on human actions. There are also no formal consequences for actions that may cause harm to others. You could do anything you want if it will benefit you since there is no sure punishment.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Important rights and changes require good knowledge and bright intelligence. In the 17th and 18th century thinkers or philosophers found new ways to understand and improve their society from where they lived in england. These philosophers shared a belief that nature is an excellent teacher. The main idea of the philosophers was individual freedom of government, religion, and women’s education. John Locke argued that individual freedom was necessary to good government.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imaginary, if a society had no set of rules to decide what right or wrong, people would have done things as anyways they like that could hurt others. Thus, a government is a necessary to keep everyone’s calming. Overall, the duty of a government is to keep people’s rights and freedom, or in other word, if there is no government, there is no…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joshua Gittens Mrs. Thunell English II Honors 6 March 2017 Old Thesis Statement: In Thomas Jefferson “Common Sense” and in Thomas Jefferson “ Declaration of Independence there are similarities and differences in ideas about patriotism and equality. Thomas Paine and Jefferson use basic techniques to make their writing and feeling known about the problem at hand. New Thesis Statement: Thomas Paine works were empathized in “Common Sense” which inspired Thomas Jefferson “Declaration of Independence” who used Paine’s beliefs of equality and independence to get America Independence from Great Britain . I. Thomas Paine was an English political, philosopher and a revolutionary A. Thomas Paine was born February 9, 1737 Thetford, United Kingdom…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Apology written by Socrates, he gives his view that if one holds both the positions, “one should look out for oneself and one’s true advantage or benefit; and one should be afraid of death and try to avoid it at all costs”, that one contradicts oneself. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates belief is right about how one contradicts oneself if they hold both the opinions previously stated. In particular, I will show that people are ignorant to what happens after death, therefore, they can not know if death is evil or hindersome. It is a safe assumption that in the statements, “one should look out for oneself and one’s true advantage or benefit; and one should be afraid of death and try to avoid it at all costs”, one believes that death…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine Common Sense Discussion Question: 1. According, to Paine, what is the difference between society and government? Society is the wants of the people; it is considered what is good. Government on the other hand is the institution used to harbor the evil of the people.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Government, on the other hand is a ‘necessary evil,’ and is existent only to stray away immoral behavior. As populations grow, governance through elections deems necessary for the stability of a society. Thomas…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locke And Hobbes

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Everything started with the philosophers John Locke and Thomas Hobbes whom had different thoughts. Locke believed that by having a government the people would be allowed to have protection for themselves and their natural rights. If there was no government it would lead to the state of nature. Which Locke and Hobbes both believed it was a horrible idea because there were no rules. Locke viewed people very differently because he believes that each human being is born with a tabula rasa mind, and they develop their learning by being exposed to a variety of things.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the government was completely controlling the people, the author is trying to showing us that everyone has their own sense of power and it should not be abused or taken by anyone. Giving the people a say and a voice is essential in order to prevent any major conflict that could lead to war or…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli, both grappling with regional instability and constant war, arrive at different frameworks for handling man’s inherent propensity for conflict from very similar models of human behavior. Hobbes, watching his fellow countrymen fight each other during the English Civil War, decided that humans perpetually desire more power to secure their well-being and therefore incline toward warfare as a means to achieve this. Machiavelli, similarly accustomed to the restless Italian Peninsula, also labeled man as power-hungry and self-centered, always striving for enough freedom to ensure one’s prosperity. In the absence of the structure and organization provided by a government, a situation dubbed mankind’s ‘natural…

    • 1255 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the course of history political leaders and other important figures have often shared with the public their idea of a perfect and ideal society, many of these leaders try to bring their visions to life through the support of their followers. Martin Luther King Jr. and Thomas Jefferson were both strong leaders, and through the help of their supporters and followers both men tried to change the history of the United States by creating what they considered an ideal society. However, King and Jefferson had different ideas of what an ideal society looked like, some of their views were similar, both men believed that every human being had the right to be free; the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Despite a few similarities,…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Countries all over the world are run by some sort of government. Each country has its own type of government be it a Democracy, Monarchy, or Dictatorship. Every country needs some sort of government to establish laws and ensure that the country runs properly. Without a government system a country is full of conflict and chaos. Since all humans have desires and have certain things that they want if a country is without a government system stating what is right and what is wrong there would be nothing but chaos in that country.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All governments are created to maintain a certain degree of order. Some governments allow each citizen an equal opportunity to participate in political outcomes. Other governments restrict the ability of citizens to have any influence over their nation’s rule. Both cases fall within the scale of government types: from oppressive regimes to anarchist factions. Although these types can differ dramatically, the same goal of all governments remains alike.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays