Toward the end of the book when he starts to bring up No Child Left Behind and how deculturized schools are becoming around the United States, I think it is very obvious that Joel Springs does not agree. He shows his bias not by straight up telling his reader, but by showing facts. He explains how No Child Left Behind has deculturalized schools by taking out multicultural curriculum and replacing it with math, science, reading and other things that will be tested. He does not address the benefits of No Child Left Behind like the free tutoring or making sure all children are actually learning. While Springs points may be biased, I think that the points he picks to argue and talk about are much more important and eye-opening than the points he does not
Toward the end of the book when he starts to bring up No Child Left Behind and how deculturized schools are becoming around the United States, I think it is very obvious that Joel Springs does not agree. He shows his bias not by straight up telling his reader, but by showing facts. He explains how No Child Left Behind has deculturalized schools by taking out multicultural curriculum and replacing it with math, science, reading and other things that will be tested. He does not address the benefits of No Child Left Behind like the free tutoring or making sure all children are actually learning. While Springs points may be biased, I think that the points he picks to argue and talk about are much more important and eye-opening than the points he does not