The Solar System: The Big Bang Theory

Amazing Essays
The big bang theory is often misinterpreted for what some may describe as the origin of the universe. However, this misconception actually informs us on how our universe was created in one single explosion, which is said to have happened approximately fourteen billion years ago.8 Everything that makes up who we are and what surrounds us started then, as an infinitely small volume that continued to expand in a ridiculously fast rate, where within a matter of minutes the universe became the size of our solar system. Our solar system is only dated to be about five billion years old.1 One second after the big bang, the universe was filled with neutrons, protons, anti-electrons, photons, and neutrinos.4 Still, thousands of years later, it continues …show more content…
First off, the big bang theory is the leading explanation of what happened during and after the moment of the creation of our universe. This theory was born off of the observation that other galaxies are continuously moving away from our own at great speed, in all directions, as if they are being propelled by an “ancient explosive force” called the red shift. These studies were also determined with the help of Christian Doppler’s reasoning (the Doppler Effect). The origin of the big bang theory can actually be dated back to 1929. This was the year that scientist Edwin Hubble and his assistant found out that the universe was expanding. In april 2000, a team of cosmologists released the first detailed images of the universe in its infancy.1 These …show more content…
These are some of the criticisms on the big bang theory. The big bang theory is said to violate the first law of thermodynamics or the law of conservation of energy. This says that energy or matter can not be created or destroyed. As we know, the big bang theory is said to state the transformation of our universe, not its origin. There are scientists who believe that the first law of thermodynamics should not even have to be applied to the big bang.11 Another critique, would be the violation of entropy: the degree of disorder or randomness in a system.11 This would be in relation to the formation of the stars and the galaxies. However, due to pictures we now have of the universe in it’s infancy, we can see that it is indeed following entropy. Another criticism would be that it is violating the law that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Space itself can expand faster than the speed of light, and as space falls outside of the domain of the theory of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Big Bang Theory

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Also the universe was considered infinite at one point in time but the Big Bang proved that the universe had to have a history and a beginning. (2)According to Chris LaRocco and Blair Rothstein article 15 billion years ago there was an explosion called the Big Bang that created the universe. This explosion contained all the matter and energy of space. Unlike other explosion like a bomb that throw fragments outwards the Big Bang filled in the space with particles of the embryonic universe. Before the Big Bang galaxies were clustered together but the explosion created space and foundation for the universe.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “The Big Bang theory is an explosion of all space that took place roughly 13.7 Billion years ago and that marks the beginning of the universe.” Universe tenth edition. Roger A. Freedman, Robert M. Geller, and William J. Kaufmann III. Scientist believe that it was nothing that came from nothing, but they’re still on the search for what is beyond nothing during…

    • 2404 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His concept hinges on neutron stars, which are massive collapsed stars the size of Manhattan but with the mass greater than that of Earth’s sun (Kaku). Kerr postulated that if these dying stars collapsed into a rotating ring of neutron stars, their force would prevent them from combining into a singularity. Since this black hole wouldn’t have a singularity, Kerr believed it would be safe to enter without the fear of the infinite gravitational force pulling and stretching you until you were ripped to shreds. Because of this reason, this is the only type of black hole that is used when the theoretical discussion of time travel arises (Bonsor and…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is known as the “baby” star. This is the part of a stars life before they make it into the main sequence, the stage where our sun is currently in. The young star can be stuck in this stage for as many years as 100,000 or more ; it all depends on how big the star is. The protostar starts forming when colossal clouds of frigid molecular hydrogen and helium collapse because of conjoint gravity. The spark of the collapse could have been caused by a galaxy collision, or the shockwave of a neighboring supernova.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, he made some assumptions in order to prove it. Hubble showed that the Universe is expanding by showing that almost all the galaxies are red shifted, meaning that they are moving away from us. Describe the probable origins of the Universe including the transformation of radiation into matter which follow the Big Bang The Universe started with a Big Bang. At the beginning of the Big bang, there was only radiation. However over time ranging from 300 seconds to 1 million years, the particles combined to form atoms…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hard determinism states determinism is incompatible with freedom. If given the opportunity to rewind time and make a different choice, humans could not choose differently, because choice does not exist. Utilizing physics, Sider states determinists could study the patterns of past behavior of the particles and forces upon them, and could, theoretically, calculate the future. Such calculation does not exist yet, but conceptually it could. Sider’s argument is an over-simplification.…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Big Bang Theory has much more evidence supporting it, while the Steady State Theory has been proven wrong. Big Bang Theory The Big Bang Theory first started from Hubble’s discovery of the Universe’s expansion. It states that all matter and energy in the universe were created in an explosion from a single tiny point about 14 billion years ago. All the matter and energy…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Basically almost everything is held by gravity in space. Some astronomers believe some galaxies as held by black holes. But is that really the case? The short period of growth of the universe started of as the Big Bang about 13.7 billion years ago. After the Big Bang the universe started to cool of, starting protons and neutrons, hydrogen, helium, lithium and more.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay On Big Bang Theory

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many theories predicted that after “The Big Bang”, there would have been a remarkable amount of release of radiation. Billions of years later, this radiation would also have been continuing to move away faster from us that the wavelength from this radiation would have been moved from being visible light to the CMB we see today. One of the major pieces of evidence for the big bang theory is that galaxies appear to be moving away from us at speeds that are relational to their distance. This piece of evidence is known as “Hubble’s Law”, and this phenomenon was discovered in in1929 by Edwin Hubble. His observation supports the expansion of the universe and also proposes that the entire universe billions of years ago, was once compacted.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pluto and Saturn are not seeking to develop nuclear capabilities, which, according to nuclear deterrence and Waltz, this leaves the door open for interstate war (Waltz). However, nuclear deterrence is not always favored. Those who oppose nuclear deterrence believe that nuclear weapons can increase the chances of regional war or destruction, that newly proliferating states are less or simply differently rational than old proliferators, and that the risk for preventative war spikes when one state tries to become a nuclear…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays