The Similarities Between The Characteristics Of A Good Burglar

Superior Essays
The previous section showed the strong similarities between the characteristics of a “good burglar” and Mr. Nordahl. First among them is his attention to detail. By controlling as many variables as possible, he was able to lower the risk involved. This included, avoiding drugs and violence, understanding his tools, targeting particular houses, and studying the items he intended to take. This all points to Nordahl’s ability to make rational decisions as to when and where to commit a crime; a characteristic also noted by Siegel. A study found in Criminology of burglars in Texas came to the same conclusion that successful burglars use rational decision making to evaluate the costs and benefits of their actions (Siegel 387). While overwhelming evidence exists classifying Nordahl as a professional burglar, there are some, subtle ways in which he deviates from the norm.
The first way Nordahl deviates from the norm is when and how he converted from legitimate ways of earning money to crime. The same study mentioned above by Cromwell, Olson and Avary, found that most burglars started as novices, studying under more experienced burglars. They moved up to the rank of a professional criminal by
…show more content…
His actions deviate from typical burglar behavior as most burglars act as a team. Siegel remarks, “The good burglar must be able to team up to form a criminal gang. Choosing trustworthy companions is essential if the obstacles to completing a successful job - police, alarms, and secure safes - are to be overcome” (Siegel 387). According to Siegel, it is almost impossible to complete successful burglaries alone. The obstacles that prevent a thief from entering a house, taking valuable items, and exiting, are too great for one person to do alone. Yet, Nordahl accomplished just that. Nowhere in the article did Rosellini mention the existence of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    As we have learned, white collar crime can be difficult to precisely define and a wide variety of definitions have been looked at in the process. While there is no consensus on one definition, there is agreement among criminologists on the following being indicative of white collar crime including the occurrence of which is in a legitimate context, motivation that is derived from economic gain or occupational success, and a lack of direct, intentional violence (Friedrichs, pg 5). Trust and respectability are also very important terms in relation to white collar crimes that we do not see with conventional crime. An important sociologist, Edwin Sutherland pointed to the violation of trust as an important element of white collar crime and characterized…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    LAPD Rampart Case Study

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Once they saw the type of life they would have such as the amount of money and extra things these gangster had they began to adopt that lifestyle. Then each officer wanted to be included and like the next so they all began to participate in this…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unique Criminal Patterns

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Theme One: Unique Criminal Patterns Compared To Other Classes Criminal behaviour amongst the nobility during the Fourteenth-Century was distinct from the lower orders for several reasons. In her article Hanawalt defines the nobility as the “fur-collar” class and defines this group as ranging from the wealthy and ancient gentry to the higher nobility. The main distinction Hanawalt remarks that most of the crimes the nobility committed during the Fourteenth-Century related to their control of wealth and power. Most of their criminal activity related to their occupations and position in society, therefore it was not considered criminal and even tolerated and expected, as long as it did not become excessive. This class tended not to commit felonious…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (p.3-4)” In previous studies on armed robberies, researchers would interview people in jail who had been arrested for committing robberies. The authors of this study took a different approach and interviewed 86 active robbers. Active robbers were defined as committing an offense in the past month. The study included both men and women, blacks and whites, and individuals…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elements of deviant and abnormal behavior associated with white-collar crime Deviant behavior is defined as any human activity that violates social norms. Social norms are the basic framework that help to keep our society organized and functioning. People that don’t or can’t abide by those norms are present in every aspect of humanity. Normally people will identify these outsiders and keep their distance. Mostly these individuals end up on the fringes of our civilized world, though there are certainly exceptions to this rule.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rational choice perspective explains the basic rationale for define place as necessary, since it espouses that offenders should select targets as well as define means of achieving their goals in a way that can be explained (Anderson, 1998). Rational choice theory is influenced from the gains and costs of committing the crime, which describe burglary crime events and burglar's behavior. Along with the combinations of routine theory, rational choice theory can be connected within the descriptions of routine. This is particularly true if a rational choice perspective is of use in combinations with routine activity theory (Barr & Pease, 1990). Routine activity theory speaks on how the burglar crime events occur under several circumstances.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction “He who does not prevent a crime when he can, encourages it”, a quote from Lucius Annaeus Seneca that helps describe how society views and “prevents” crime. Criminal theories attempt to construct views on how to prevent and fight crime but often the criminal justice system is working against society. The two theories that are explained within are the social learning theory and rational choice theory. These theories will construct views as to how and why the seven crimes are committed using the concepts within the theories.…

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evidently this source is reliable to my research as it presents not only a clear definition of white-collar crime that is subject to become a red-collar, but thought provoking questions regarding the criminals mental/personality traits which are essential to the studying the reasons behind such…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, a robber has to meet the victim to commit the robbery, and a burglar need to break into a residential place to steal valuable stuff from…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These questions range from the subject ever wanting to commit murder to the reasons why such thoughts were crossed. The biggest piece of information that relates to criminology in this book is the biological and past factors that influence one’s behavior towards murder. B. Purpose - As the reader goes through the journey the book provides, he or she is introduced to the mindset and implications of a murderer. Buss goes into detail on what the murderer is thinking and why they choose to murder. For example, one of the key factors that Buss includes in his writings is that the clear majority of murderers do not commit murder several times and when they do, it is already pre-planned.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both theories provide reasonable explanations as to why the murder was committed, only from two different standpoints. Social Learning Theory illustrates how a criminal’s past or social life might influence a crime they have committed, while Rational Choice Theory embodies the reason a criminal might choose to commit an offence and the way that they might consciously rationalize the decision to go through with it. These theories both outline how a criminal analyzes a situation, and describes how crime is understood from a criminal’s perspective and finally how they might piece together each detail in order to make the conscious decision to commit a criminal offence. Through examination of the Social Learning and Rational Choice Theories of crime we can speculate why Dellen Millard and Mark Smich committed such a senseless act of murder. The theories explained how the criminals came to make the conscious decision they did, and how their upbringing influenced them to commit a heinous crime.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The goals can be financial, pleasure, or some other beneficial result. The Rational Choice Theory perspective as presented by Cornish and Clark (1985) is based upon three concepts; (one) criminal offenders are rational and make choices and decisions that benefit themselves; (two) a crime- specific focus is required; and (three) there is a distinction between choices related to criminal involvement and decisions related to criminal events. The theory of rational choice theory examines offender decision making and the factors that affect it such as assessments of risks, rewards, and morality of various behaviors (Clarke, 1983). The balance between likely risks and rewards influences offenders target selection (Clarke, 1983). According to Brantingham and Brantingham (1984), the level of risks is one of the factors that make a target good or bad.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Criminology studies the reasoning and factors as to why individuals engage in criminal activities. In classical criminology, social philosophers Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham developed a theory of crime that criminologist and theorist still use today (Akers 2017). In classical criminology, an individual commits a crime by making a rational decision. That decision is based off of whether the benefits that one might receive by offending outweighs the consequences such as being caught and cited or sentenced. Individuals base their decision to offend or not offend on what they have seen others suffer, their knowledge of what consequences they may endure and their own personal experiences.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many factors taken into consideration when individuals commit crimes such as, the punishment one would receive, the success they would receive and who it would benefit. Crime is broken for personal reasons, it is a cost benefit analysis (Hayward, 2007). The offender determines the advantage of criminal behaviour. Rational choice theory assumes that an individual is egotistic (Boudon, 2003). It is perceived that an individual who commits an unlawful act is mainly concerned with only themselves.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The classical school of thought is based on the idea that people are free to make decisions, and that punishment can be a deterrent to crime, the punishment is proportionate, fits the crime, and are expeditiously. The theory that participates in the classical school of criminology is that "criminals make the rational choice and choose to commit criminal acts because of the maximum pleasure and minimum pain," (Classical, 2012). Theorist went further to explain that to discourage and lessen crime, and the severity of certain penalties must be proportionate to the crime committed and not more than what is necessary in order to deter the offender and others from committing more crimes (Classical, 2010). This theoretical framework and thought constitute the classical school of criminology.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays