Hannibal Lecter definitely displays the violent nature often considered with psychopaths. However, these murders and killings usually take a copious amount of skill and intelligence. The way many of his murders are displayed or prepared in an elegant meal shows a great deal of care, dedication, or love for these horrendous deeds. Even when he murders someone close to him, the extra effort he puts forth after their death shows he cares more of them than others. This shows an ability to establish personal relationships or to love someone or something. That is two symptoms that do not diagnosis Hannibal Lecter as a psychopath. He does not fit the symptom of being an antisocial individual, which is a crucial factor in him not being a psychopath. Hannibal is undoubtedly a social person, and one reason he killed some individuals is because he saw them as rude. Therefore, Silence of the Lambs is wrong about Hannibal Lecter being described as a
Hannibal Lecter definitely displays the violent nature often considered with psychopaths. However, these murders and killings usually take a copious amount of skill and intelligence. The way many of his murders are displayed or prepared in an elegant meal shows a great deal of care, dedication, or love for these horrendous deeds. Even when he murders someone close to him, the extra effort he puts forth after their death shows he cares more of them than others. This shows an ability to establish personal relationships or to love someone or something. That is two symptoms that do not diagnosis Hannibal Lecter as a psychopath. He does not fit the symptom of being an antisocial individual, which is a crucial factor in him not being a psychopath. Hannibal is undoubtedly a social person, and one reason he killed some individuals is because he saw them as rude. Therefore, Silence of the Lambs is wrong about Hannibal Lecter being described as a