Biomedical Example
With regards to decision making, each association has steps or systems they use to settle moral issues. Being a representative of an association, you are furnished with the essential assets to keep conflict to a minimum. One of the enormous issues we confront today is should well known individuals be viewed differently than individuals who are less lucky with regards to medical attention. There may be a chosen few who believe they ought to get extraordinary treatment; while there are other people who believe everybody is the same. Let us consider the Mickey Mantle case, in which he was placed ahead of others to receive a liver transplant in 1995. Utilizing the seven-stage choice model, we will decide whether Mickey Mantle ought to have gotten special treatment when it came to treatment.
Mickey Mantle Mickey Mantle was known for his hall of fame career in baseball. He was known as …show more content…
He returned a few weeks later to get treatment for carcinogenic spotting at Baylor Medical Treatment Facility. In the blink of an eye, he learned that the cancer had spread from his liver to his right lung as well as his abdomen. Typically, with patients managing Alcoholic Liver Disease (ALD), they are not permitted to have a transplant for six months in order to give time for the liver to become strong enough to handle the surgery and heal. “The six month rule has two purposes; namely, allowing the liver a chance to recover in the absence of alcohol, and also observation of the patient to verify that he/she remains alcohol free, with the hope of reducing the risk of relapse” (US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health, 2006). Most patients who get the transplant have a 78% chance for a three-year survival. Unfortunately, because of his cirrhosis he just had a 60% chance for a three-year survival. (EMedicine Health,
With regards to decision making, each association has steps or systems they use to settle moral issues. Being a representative of an association, you are furnished with the essential assets to keep conflict to a minimum. One of the enormous issues we confront today is should well known individuals be viewed differently than individuals who are less lucky with regards to medical attention. There may be a chosen few who believe they ought to get extraordinary treatment; while there are other people who believe everybody is the same. Let us consider the Mickey Mantle case, in which he was placed ahead of others to receive a liver transplant in 1995. Utilizing the seven-stage choice model, we will decide whether Mickey Mantle ought to have gotten special treatment when it came to treatment.
Mickey Mantle Mickey Mantle was known for his hall of fame career in baseball. He was known as …show more content…
He returned a few weeks later to get treatment for carcinogenic spotting at Baylor Medical Treatment Facility. In the blink of an eye, he learned that the cancer had spread from his liver to his right lung as well as his abdomen. Typically, with patients managing Alcoholic Liver Disease (ALD), they are not permitted to have a transplant for six months in order to give time for the liver to become strong enough to handle the surgery and heal. “The six month rule has two purposes; namely, allowing the liver a chance to recover in the absence of alcohol, and also observation of the patient to verify that he/she remains alcohol free, with the hope of reducing the risk of relapse” (US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health, 2006). Most patients who get the transplant have a 78% chance for a three-year survival. Unfortunately, because of his cirrhosis he just had a 60% chance for a three-year survival. (EMedicine Health,