As the possession owner, he naturally deems the deeds of the children as the infringement upon his property, space and privacy. Both the isolated lifestyle and his assertion of his garden as his personal property contribute to the blindness of his selfishness, as he declares that "my own garden is my own garden, anyone can understand that, and I will allow nobody to play in it but myself.” In this sense, the story also involves the moral degradation in such a society where people only reserve beauty to himself or herself. This moral degeneration defies with the principle of beauty and love advocated by Wilde. Ironically, the dilemma of the giant alludes to the weary and complicated reality. The giant's possession of a fantastic garden as well as his assertion of his property closely resembles the bourgeois lifestyle existing in the realistic human world. His selfishness is partly a result of the existing law and order, since the giant can easily deny the children’s joy of playing in the garden by posting a host as long as he is the owner of the garden. From this perspective, the giant has every right to protect his property, even to cruelly expel the children. In a sense, the giant is blinded by the law system and existing social order, which also contributes to his ignorance of his selfishness. The story thus reveals a paradox between existing law and morals. The giant has a lot in common with his human counterparts. For his insistency on law, his deeds of posting a notice is built on his belief of the social order which is granted by the law. The fairy tale suggests that the existing social order is not equivalent to goodness and moral
As the possession owner, he naturally deems the deeds of the children as the infringement upon his property, space and privacy. Both the isolated lifestyle and his assertion of his garden as his personal property contribute to the blindness of his selfishness, as he declares that "my own garden is my own garden, anyone can understand that, and I will allow nobody to play in it but myself.” In this sense, the story also involves the moral degradation in such a society where people only reserve beauty to himself or herself. This moral degeneration defies with the principle of beauty and love advocated by Wilde. Ironically, the dilemma of the giant alludes to the weary and complicated reality. The giant's possession of a fantastic garden as well as his assertion of his property closely resembles the bourgeois lifestyle existing in the realistic human world. His selfishness is partly a result of the existing law and order, since the giant can easily deny the children’s joy of playing in the garden by posting a host as long as he is the owner of the garden. From this perspective, the giant has every right to protect his property, even to cruelly expel the children. In a sense, the giant is blinded by the law system and existing social order, which also contributes to his ignorance of his selfishness. The story thus reveals a paradox between existing law and morals. The giant has a lot in common with his human counterparts. For his insistency on law, his deeds of posting a notice is built on his belief of the social order which is granted by the law. The fairy tale suggests that the existing social order is not equivalent to goodness and moral