The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Improved Essays
The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what. Gun control laws should not be strengthened because there are already enough laws on the books, statistics show that gun control is not working, and more regulations only affect the law abiding. The federal government has not passed a new gun control …show more content…
In 1994 the republican controlled congress put a hold on any further actions towards gun control at the federal level. At the state level there are a number of different views when it comes to gun control. For example, Arizona has some of the most lenient guns laws of all the states. Arizona does not require a background check to transfer a firearm, does …show more content…
This law is called The Gun Control Act of 1968. Under this law anyone who sells a firearm as a retailer is required to have his customer fill out an ATF form 4473. On this form there are nine areas that if the customer answers yes to they are automatically prohibited from the purchase of a firearm. Some of the reasons a person may be prohibited from purchasing a firearm are if they are a convicted felon, an illegal alien, someone with a history of domestic violence, and someone who has renounced their American citizenship. Also, with this law every gun retailer must keep an “Acquisition and Disposition” log of every firearm they have in their inventory and every firearm they sell. The Gun Control Act of 1968 also forbids the purchase of any handgun outside of the state that the customer resides in. Also this law states that private sales may only take place between residents of the same state, and these private sales are described as the sale of a rifle between members of the same gun club (Kopel, 2016). The main focus of The Gun Control Act of 1968 was to regulate retail sales and the interstate commerce of said sales. It did not regulate the private sales within the individual

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This means that although the federal government cannot make laws outlawing firearms, the individual states can. 48 years later, in 1934, the National Firearms Act was created. It required registration and taxes on sawed off shotguns and automatic weapons. It often made you get a license to own a…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sad truth is that some people would abuse and take advantage of the right to own a weapon. The Supreme Court ruling in the District of Colombia v. Heller case says that the Second Amendment, “… is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act says that it is unlawful to sell a weapon to anyone with the following conditions: under indictment or has been convicted for any crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, a fugitive from justice, an unlawful user or addict of marijuana or any depressant or stimulant drug, and has been declared mentally ill or been committed to any mental institution. These regulations keep guns out of the hands of those who cannot be…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, one can buy it even if one is a felon, a fugitive, a drug addict, undocumented, dishonorably discharged, committed to a mental institution, etc.” (Grayson, 2016) This is an even more terrifying prospect than the standard workarounds for gun shows because these weapons can be sent anywhere discretely and can be purchased with untraceable means such as cash gift cards. The main problem here is that the internet is expanding and evolving faster than the USA’s painfully slow legislative process can keep up with. By the time laws have been passed with regards to the internet, it has evolved months or even years before so that the effect of such laws is…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control Book Report

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Recently there have been many debates on gun control and whether or not there should be more restrictions on guns. This issue has been a conflict since around 1930. The Federal Government placed one of the beginning gun control law called National Firearms Act of 1934. This act was meant to stop gun violence with gangs across America.…

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. The District of Columbia v. Heller ruled that it is an individual’s right to possess a gun for lawful use such as self protection in their home. The National Firearms Act of 1934 mandated that all people who engaged in the business of selling weapons and people who owned weapons such as machine guns, short-barreled shotguns, and silencers register with the Collector of Internal Revenue and pay taxes for the firearm transfer. The Gun Control Act of 1968 imposed restrictions on sales of guns and ammunition across state lines, imposed restrictions on the import of firearms,…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Over the past years, there have been many debates over guns and the protection the Second Amendment gives to firearms. As with all debates, there are sides to them. Gun control activist are people who wish to have legislation passed that is intended to lower violence related to firearms as well as limit a civilians opportunity to possess a firearm. On the other side of the spectrum are the gun rights activist who seek argue that by passing legislation on gun control, it is infringing on the rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Signed in on December 15, 1791, the Second Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms as one of ten amendments that would make up the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The chronicles of gun control within America is an extensive and vast journey that extends across the past one hundred years. The history of gun control is first seen being implemented back in 1934 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt enacted the National Firearms Act of 1934, which was the commencement of any regulation and control over firearms. Furthermore, this enactment made all purchases of a weapon at the time to be archived in a national registry and imposed a $200 tax on the sale of firearms, which at the time included; machine guns, and sawed-off shotguns. President Franklin D. Roosevelt continues his progression of gun control later in 1938 when he introduces the National Firearms Act of 1938, which was requiring gun dealers in America to have a valid license to sell the weapons. In addition, the enactment of the National Firearms Act of 1938 also made the prohibition of firearms to convicted felons and individual under indictment.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subject that I have chosen is very controversial, considering the recent events of the past few years. The topic that I have chosen to do my research paper over is Gun Control. First I want to say that I am against Gun Control and it 's entirety, also I believe it impedes on our 2nd Amendment rights. Many obstacles have been placed to bring up the discussion over Gun Control, but one question ponders the mind, will the banning of guns really deter the rate of crime? Most people may know what the recent Gun control laws detail, but for those unfamiliar with them I will explain.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the past there have been many incidents and situations that have occurred that have made people question whether the second amendment ( the right of US citizens to bear arms) is a beneficial law that ensures the safety of all citizens. All people have their opinions on the topic, some say that it should be illegal for a citizen to own a gun because of the dangerous outcomes that could come from it, and some say that all people should be allowed to own guns because they can use them for self defense. Terrorism is an action that is used to conflict pain and suffering over other people all throughout the world, it has been an issue for many years. By making the current gun laws stricter and possibly making new ones we could possibly lessen the amount of terrorism and the effects of it.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additional gun laws are not needed because there are enough regulations to provide adequate protection for the public. The existing gun regulations are reasonable due to the background checks that are required when purchasing a gun. Current gun laws outline the requirements of…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns In Schools

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Within the Bill of Rights is the second amendment, which states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Bill of Rights). Fast-forwarding trough time from the past there have been obvious need for change with gun laws…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, others want more gun control laws enforced because most of them believe there has become a lot of violence involving guns. For example, in 2015, there were ten of the most deadliest mass shootings recorded ranging from five to sixteen people killed. In June of 2016, forty-nine people were killed in the Orlando massacre. John Donohue stated from his recent study, “more guns would equal more crime,” where he found the right-to-carry laws have increased eight percent and firearms have increased thirty-three percent in aggravated assaults.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that if somehow possessing a handgun negatively affects interstate commerce, then congress can pass a law which enacts some sort of law on handguns, that in turn protects interstate commerce. The question that arises here is to what extent congress will go to argue that guns do affect interstate commerce, as seen in the court case United States Vs. Lopez. Clearly there are several sides and interpretations to the Constitution and how it should be applied to gun control…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays