Samaritan's Dilemmas

Superior Essays
Short Essay Assignment #1 Many citizens fight for equality. Equality among race, gender, and class. To achieve this, we must first look at the broader topic of equity. Equity has more to do with your rights, fairness, diversity in society and liberty. In her book, The Samaritan’s Dilemma: Should Government Help Your Neighbor?, Deborah Stone takes a look at the shifts in attitude about public policy in the United States. Stone wants to help American’s in finding true altruism. She argues that the people of our country aren’t necessarily greedy, but we tend to put in as much or little as we please when helping the community. When this book was written, we were still in a time where Reaganomics was largely widespread and “Help is Harmful” was …show more content…
We care about others and help in ways in which we’re able. Stone believes that those people who promote self-interest are disconnecting us from the desire to care for others. She makes the argument that democracy does not rely on self-interest, but altruism, and that the human psyche is equipped with the need to help people and connect ourselves to something larger. The “Samaritan’s dilemma” is the challenge one faces when deciding how to deal with the poor. In the first chapter, she discusses the two views of help. On one end, people believe “A nation that coddles its weak becomes a weak nation” (Stone 9). She argues that opinion and states that “the Good Samaritan stands as moral hero. His moral code is simple: Help When Help Is Needed. It’s almost always wrong not to help” (Stone 9). The moral hazard we deal with is not catering to the indigent but walking away from the people who really need help. Stone argues that we as society need to learn that being a good Samaritan, and helping our neighbors, is the best thing we can do. She also believes that we can aid the needy by, through government programs, enable them to help others. As a conservative, I believe so strongly in that idea. I want to help people help themselves, without causing harm to others. We can not allow the gap between the rich and poor to continue widening without any action. The actions we must take is through everyday altruism and being a Good …show more content…
There is a social and physical influence with doing good which results in creating a more civil humanity. She says, “Finding altruism is simply a matter of believing in it and looking for it” (Stone 287). Personally, I want everyone to work together to solve common problems, rather than the government. The only way to begin this process is through everyday altruism, as Stone reiterates. I believe the government should help your neighbor to an extent, until he is able to help himself. Most people who require government and citizen help would love to be on the other side one day, helping others. Not everyone is as lazy as people perceive. If a man really needs help, he will find it and use it however he wants to turn his life around in small ways. After chapter two is where I started feeling really convinced by the central argument of the book. In her second chapter, Stone discusses the idea that entitlements undermine good citizenship and that help makes people dependent. She says we ought not condemn citizens for seeking government help, as that undermines democracy. She writes, “The entitlement diagnosis gets it exactly wrong. Mutual dependence is the essence of democracy. Democracy engages citizens with the hope that they can improve their lives by working together, and with the faith that they can accomplish more by working together than going it

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the article, Small Change, by Malcom Gladwell a New York Times writer, he shows his readers how much social activism has changed over the years along with the quality of results it yields. “Fifty years after one of the most extraordinary episodes of social upheaval in American history, we seem to have forgotten what activism is.” (Gladwell 2) He focuses on how the world has changed in its way of how exactly social reform is achieved as well as what constitutes as substantive social reform. He thoroughly explains that in the past movements they were created from strong tie connections with friends, family, and overall community.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even a cursory understanding of how Jesus treats people in the Bible indicates that helping people is very important to him. He especially helped the poor and the sick. Thus, as a Christian, I am called to help those in poverty. This book provides a practical way to carryout what my ethical model calls me to do. This book illustrates how to actually make a difference in the lives of those who live in poverty.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are many different ways we can identify ourselves—perhaps you are a white, female, San Franciscan, or a first-generation college student and Chinese-American son. Please share two or three of your core identifiers and how they have shaped who you are. (500) I am Chinese-American. I am the proud daughter of two Chinese immigrants, who rose out of poverty in order to go to medical school and become successful doctors in the United States. They raised my sister and me while still struggling through their residency, and still take us back to their native cities of Shanghai and Wenzhou whenever they can.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil society is a contested and developed theory studied by various scholars across the globe. Based on intense research conducted to define this social construct, the high level of complexity and difficulty to understand is evident. Philosophers Brian O’Connell (1999) and Bruce Sievers (2010), publicized their developed understanding of what constitutes civil society and the essential elements required to sustain the conditions of civil society. In exploring their work, both authors agree the relationship between the nonprofit sector and civil society promotes democracy, which is enhanced by its institutional structures and normative ideals. The most important institutional structure, system of free expression, is defined as a “definitive…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He reasons that everyone on the planet does not have an equal entitlement on the resources of others, that we are bound to a greater duty to our family and circle, who have a greater right. By providing for and ensuring happiness to our immediate needs from all others that may claim to our resources, is, in fact, a more efficient means to achieve happiness. Singer counters that although pockets within these first world nations can experience poverty relative to others within their population, these developing nations face absolute poverty, where life is plagued by hardships including death, disease, squalid living conditions and overall despair. Where industrialized nations possess a prosperity and capacity to provide assistance to third world nations, Singer suggests that a donation of one-tenth of their wage would not only lessen the destitution of their fellow man but could be achieved without cost to their own particular well-being and wealth. As this act would maximize the utility or happiness for the greatest number of world citizens and therefore have an ethical obligation to do…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Comparability In Famine, Affluence, and Morality by Peter Singer, he argues that we are morally obligated to donate as much money to charity as we can to help limit poverty in the world. Singer explains that there are many people in the world suffering from poverty, and living very poor-quality lives as a result of poverty. He argues that poverty is morally wrong because of the suffering it promotes. Singer believes it is the moral obligation of humans to donate as much as they can to help limit the suffering of the poor in the world, without sacrificing anything moral comparability. In this paper, I will argue that Singer uses vague language to describe what the line is for moral comparability.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peter Singer Argument

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The underlying goal of philosophy is to help humans seek the ultimate truth to the questions that orbit their knowledge for the meaning of existence. One question that many philosophers are challenging themselves to answer would be that of just how far individuals should go in order to provide relief for those who are suffering from poverty. After attaining a degree in bioethics, a professor by the name of Peter Singer recently ventured to provide the world with an answer to the question that had been protruding the minds of many philosophers. Singer claims, “The formula is simple: whatever money you’re spending on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away.” Although Singer’s argument proposes an idea that could be beneficial towards…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Makes the World Go Round Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer, explains in the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” that all prosperous people should give all money that is not needed for basic necessities to places that are in need of food and medicine. As an American, I have knowledge this argument would shake up America as a whole. This could create a world of giving up the Capitalistic ways of America and the economic food chain. On the other hand, it could create a world of kindness and less violence. Can you imagine giving up your freedom to help others?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good Samaritan Rule

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    United of States has a law commonly known as the Good Samaritan rule that is dominant in the US and is generally designed to protect people from harm by any omission or negligent act that results while providing voluntary assistance to others in a medical emergency. The nature and scope of immunity of such laws varies jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Legislation in some states offer immunity only to doctors, while other states extend the immunity to emergency medical personnel, police and firefighters.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin argues about “a world that must solve real and pressing problems of overpopulation, hunger and moral duty.” Hardin sets the stage by first giving his analysis on the structure of the world today by describing the earth as a lifeboat rather than a spaceship. He then dives into how population control, the tragedy of the commons and immigration are some of the main reasons for the problems we have today. Hardin argues that simply helping people and giving charitably will not solve these problems. Peter Singer, in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” seemingly goes against Hardin by saying that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As my Mathematics professor always says, “Helping one person might not change the whole world, but it could change the world for one person.” For some people who live in the third world countries such as Ethiopia and Sudan, even a few dollars or a cup of water is a great help. However, in today’s society, most people only care about themselves and forget to think of others in need. Less and less people are willing to help others. Moreover, some people once accepted help, but they forget that many are like them that need help.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In efforts to find summum bonum or the ultimate good, philosophers during the 20th century began to investigate ethical issues, and tried to create their own versions of an ideal moral code. During this time, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer base their ethical beliefs in the philosophy of utilitarianism. Both Mill’s essay Utilitarianism and Singer’s work Famine, Affluence and Morality explore the pursuit of happiness and its relation to moral philosophy. The doctrine of utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of one’s actions as they add to the sum total of happiness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer begins with the assumption that famine should be eradicated, based upon the generally wide held principle that the suffering created by lack of food is bad. He then sets up the general basis for his argument which is: “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (Singer 231). From this general idea, Singer outlines the reasons why it is a person’s moral duty to prevent famine and how a person should help alleviate famine, all of which can be backed by the theory of utilitarianism. Singer claims that a person has the duty morally to give in order to prevent something bad from occurring.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life You Can Save Argument

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter Singer’s main philosophy is that no child or adult living in poor countries should die due to a lack of fresh water, food or basic health and medical needs. He gives examples like the drowning child to make people aware that, if it is in your power to prevent something bad from happening without sacrificing anything as valuable or important, then it is wrong not to do so. Mr. Singer feels that people that live and receive beyond their basic needs should contribute to aid agencies. Singer believes that spending extra money on luxuries while 10 million children are dying due to poverty is just utterly and morally erroneous. Thus, John Arthur is also a utilitarian and believes that people should contribute to aid agencies that will stop unfortunate people from dying each year due to poverty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays