The Inevitability Of The Russian Revolution Of 1917

Improved Essays
The Russian Revolution of 1917 has been interpreted by various historiographical positions regarding the causation and overall inevitability of the revolution. While the theory of deepening revolution, theorized by Crane Britton which suggests that the Russian revolution followed a determinist state of events leading towards a new governmental ideology, is a possible explanation for the events in 1917, the historiographical position which best explains the inevitability of the Russian revolution is the modernization theory, popularized by George Kennan. This argues that instead of following a determined order of events leading towards revolution, it was in fact the modernization of Russia directly contradicting the tsarist ideology, which contributed to the inevitability of the revolution. Yet, while the tradition soviet view suggests that this inevitable revolution was part of a process, which would have ultimately led to Bolshevikian rule, the Bolsheviks, in fact, hijacked an evolving democratic revolution led by the Mensheviks, which …show more content…
When one supposes that the inevitable revolution would occur, it can be observed that while the Menshevik party had a majority support in the Russian government during the election of the Duma representatives, it was the Bolsheviks who ultimately seized power after the October revolution. The Bolsheviks altered the nature of the revolution to one of autocracy, not for the masses. Therefore, while the modernization of Russia led to the probable inevitability of the revolution, it was the influence of the Bolsheviks, supported by the non-Bolshevik socialist view, which created the Russian revolution of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The question of why the autocratic tsarist state of Russia fell is complex and has been interpreted in a variety of ways by historians. The fall began with the 1905 Revolution, on January 9th, or “Bloody Sunday” when a group of demonstrating workers with grievances for the Tsar were fired on by troops. Tsar Nicholas II agreed to concessions including the establishment of a State Duma. Despite these concessions, conflict and pressure continued leading to the final collapse of the tsarist system with the Revolution of 1917. Historians have answered the question of why tsarism fell in different ways.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the year 1917, multiple revolutions took place including the october revolution and the february revolution. The cause for these revolutions is to end imperial rule from other interfering countries. The reason why the russian revolution started was because people were unhappy with their king, Nicholas 2 who believed in government corruption. Once the Russian Revolution started people started to gain more support and more benefits from the government. One reason why the russian revolution of 1917 have the support of the people because the revolution mostly benefited the working class.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Russian Revolution Dbq

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Russian Revolution succeeded their chant more than the French Revolution Diego De La Cruz Towards the end of the 1700’s there was a revolution that started all revolutions. The American revolution showed many people that anyone can win a revolution and this revolution started many revolutions in the future. The French revolution another example of corrupt government that was to be overthrew by the people. The same goes for the Russian Revolution where Nicholas II had many events that made the people of Russia not trust Nicholas II and the ideals of an absolute monarchy anymore.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The political shift that occurred during the early twentieth century in Russia remains one of the most successful anti-monarchal revolutions in history. The political and social climate leading up to the February and October Revolutions of 1917 was unique, fueled by tense relations between the Russian working class and the royal family. It was the detrimental political missteps by Tsar Nicholas II, as well as his inability to compromise and unwavering desire to retain autocratic control of the nation, which led to the overwrought bond between the monarchy and the common-folk. The removal of the Romanov family from their prestigious throne was a direct result of the divide that Tsar Nicholas II created between the monarchy and the working class.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The October Revolution: Coup or Social Uprising? Historians along the century have questioned the veracity of the narrative the Bolsheviks fed to the people of Russia and the rest of the world. These historians claim that the communist party has distorted the facts of said revolution to control masses during the Soviet reign. The overthrow of the Provisional Government in October 1917 was both a Bolshevik-engineered coup d’état and a popular revolution. Chroniclers have debated this statement owing to the fact that said people come from different socio-political backgrounds and the varying historiographies of individual authors.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Due to the Russian people’s struggling economy while under power of a czar, the people tried a system in which society was equal. Communism prevailed, and Russia decided that communism was the way to go. Very soon, communist Russia had replaced czarist Russia. This event was formally known as the Bolshevik…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar, Nicholas II at the brink of the 1905 Revolution after months of rioting, protesting and disorder ran amok. Nicholas II would finally promise the formation of a Duma and a National Parliament which would have a Prime Minister elected, by the people of Russia. This would allow the people and the government to have what was thought to have some power and for the people to participate towards the nation. This would give one main and important need to in particular, the peasants who made up the population of Russia and would give more rights and freedom which was the main reason for the 1905 “revolution”. This satisfied the Russian people enough to gain a halt on their outcry and unrest, enough for the Tsar to regain control of Russia, the main purpose of this tactic.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nationalism In Russia

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In1917 Russia a rocky country and not very stable. They were unable to accommodate with Tsar Nicholas II having just been over thrown and were in desperate need of help. The second revolution developed the Marxist Bolsheviks who were a communist party that looked to gain more freedom and justice for themselves. The Russians exhibited many internal problems while trying to establish the country. Russia was also struggling to find a strong political leader and government system that could provide guidance and bring the country together.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Russian Revolution was a major turning point in Russian history. Destructive, dangerous, harsh, and cruel are words that characterize the Russian Revolution. The Russian Revolution caused major political changes in Russia. The Russian Revolution had many negative outcomes, but it also had some positive outcomes. The Russian Revolution was a failure because there was a loss of many freedoms such as press, speech, and equality.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposition in Russia opposed to Tsar Nicholas II autocratic style of before 1905 can be categorised into two main groups: Revolutionaries and Reformers (liberals). In turn the revolutionaries can be further divided into three distinct groups: Populists, Social Democrats and Social Revolutionaries. It has long been debated how much of a danger they posed to the tsardom, before 1905, which is what I shall be discussing. The Populists, who dated back to the 1870s, regarded that Russia’s future was in the hands of the Peasants.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Politically changes in attitudes threatened the autocratic rule of Tsar, many had heard of democracy and civil liberties from their appearances in Western Europe, thus leading to the formation of several political parties with various anti-autocratic ideologies, including the Socialist Democratic Party (of which a faction later become the Bolsheviks (Source B). The Bolsheviks in particular played a big role in the revolution and Russia society in the early 20th century, with ideology rooted in socialism and the belief that revolution was the only way to overthrow the tsarist rule, the Bolsheviks spent much of the years prior to the Tsars abdication working to undermine his rule. It is these changes which many historians attribute to reasons for the fall of the dynasty, suggesting that Russian political attitudes were no longer compatible with an autocratic political…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The revolutions in Russia during 1917, particularly the February Revolution, 'grew out of prewar political and economic instability, technological backwardness, and fundamental social divisions, coupled with gross mismanagement of the war effort, continuing military defeats' and the inadequacy of the Tsar and his government. However, whilst it was these factors combined that resulted in the Russian Revolution, the primary factor…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the first socialist country in the world, Russia had a lengthy and tough time to change and develop the country in 1917. The Russian Revolution of 1917 covers the major events such as the February Revolution and the October Revolution that result in the established of the Soviet Union. The Russian Revolution caused the encounter of labors and people. Their sacrifices and protests eventually made the revolution come true. Since the socialist government overthrew the czarist government, there were both political and economic exchanges occurred in the revolution.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Revolution according to the Webster Dictionary "is a sudden, extreme or complete change in the way people live work etc". During the World War 1 Russia witnessed the transition to a different and renewed that brought with itself some good and bad consequences; however it is necessary to analyze and understand each phase of the process in order to create a concept and a point of view. The Russian revolution has three main causes: political, social and economics.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays