The Runaway Trolley Analysis

Superior Essays
The first Dilemma is The Runaway Trolley. In short, The Runaway Trolley deals with a complex situation where Molly needs to push a stranger onto the tracks to prevent the trolley from killing five workmen. If she does not push the stranger the five workers will die. According to the Utilitarianism, a philosophical school of thought, Molly should push the stranger onto the tracks to save the five workers. Utilitarianism would argue that five lives is greater than one. Therefore, Molly would have to sacrifice one life in order to save five lives. In addition, the Ultriam approach emphasis to do what the greatest amount good, to the greatest amount of people. Thus, I reiterate that she would have to push the stranger onto the tracks to achieve …show more content…
The description of the stranger to be large is crucial because it futures the position that Molly would need to push the stranger onto the tracks. In accordance with the Ultiranistic approach a stranger who is large is less valuable than a stranger who is healthy. This because a stranger who is large is less likely to contribute to the common-welfare of the people, and is more likely to be a strain on economic system. As a large stranger, it is more likely that the stranger would constantly utilize healthcare, influence other individuals in unhealthy choices and more likely to die early. In other words, the large stranger does not have as much value as the five workers in the Runaway Trolley Dilemma. To emphasize, Molly has no other choice, she would not be able to leave the five workers to die; she would not be able to save the large stranger. She would have to do what is greatest for the greatest amount of people which is to push the large stranger to save five …show more content…
Egoism emphasize to do what is best for yourself. Therefore, he would not tell the general populace or anybody about his patients intentions. An egoist position would never risk losing their medical license because tit can be the main source of income. In consequence, Ken can become economically unstable and lose his job, car, and house. That would be disastrous according to egoism. In the scholarly article “Egoism” by Robert Shaver, Shaver emphasis how egoism would be applied in this situation when he states “Psychological egoism claims that each person has but one ultimate aim: her own welfare. This allows for action that fails to maximize perceived self-interest, but rules out the sort of behavior psychological egoists like to target — such as altruistic behavior or motivation by thoughts of duty alone” (Shaver 1). Therefore, Ken would have to care about his own welfare. In consequence he would do nothing so he can stay economically stable and avoid

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Ethical egoism is a moral theory focused on improving a person’s well-being. There are many arguments for ethical egoism such as the self reliance argument and the best argument for ethical egoism, both presented by Shafer-Landau in The Fundamentals of Ethics. However, in this paper I will discuss how objections presented by Shafer-Landau and Dr. Thomas Carson are fatal to ethical egoism, while keeping in mind arguments for ethical egoism. I will discuss objections such as ethical egoism permitting or sometimes requiring murder, theft, or rape, in order to promote oneself’s well-being, egoists subconscious belief of their lives being more important than others, and an argument presented in class that if egoists must do what is best for their…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    FAQs on Utilitarianism and Ethical Egoism Welcome participants to the ABC Diversity Fair 2017. As we go through the day we will discuss how Utilitarianism and Ethical Egoism is important to recognize and be able to handle in your professional and personal life. As you peruse the flyer you will see the FAQ section that will guide you through this fair. FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) Q: What are ethics?…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The way I acted could represent selfishness as I did not acknowledge Ken’s presence as the table – being blinded to the outer world since there were all the basic resources right in front of…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is why I would say that Mill would save the five from the ocean tide and let the one die. I think these theories are easier to state than to follow through on. Like I stated earlier the Utilitarian theory is not hard to understand, but I find it difficult to put into action because saying to always choose which has the greatest utility or goodness is hard when you have to decide to save one person or five…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Last Train Home” is a documentary film produced by Lixin Fan in 2009 which won the awards at various film festivals. It’s a real-life story based on one of the migrant worker family who left their village in Sichuan and their children at a very young child with their grandmother because they were poor. However, they soon realised the wrenching cost they had to pay. The husband and wife pair worked in a crammed area with many other workers.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Exploration of Utilitarianism When looking at our nation as it is today, it seems almost impossible that there was a time at which we were without a state. The state plays a more active role in our lives today than ever before. All throughout time, many philosophers, as well as everyday people, evaluate whether or not a state is justified, and if it is, who should rule. While most would agree that the state is justified, there are many different ideas as to how much power the state should have, and who should be able to rule. In this paper, I will focus on the Utilitarian argument for the state, a popular objection to Utilitarianism, and my own response as to why this objection is valid.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before learning about all of the different ethical theories we had a few different cases to think about and decide what we do in the situation. I believe that at the time I based my decisions solely on what I thought I should do, but had absoluetly no explaination as to why. Now, though some of my answers have changed and some have not, I have a new found knowledge and understanding of ethics that has better shaped my decisions and understanding of the world in general. My initial response to the Shallow Pond case was to miss the exam and save the child 's life. In the Coffee vs Letter case I chose to donate.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us begin by formally defining act utilitarianism: a theory of right action that defines the act to be “right if and only if, and because, its consequences contain at least as large a net balance of wellbeing minus ill-being as those of any alternative possible act in that situation” (Frick, Lecture 1 Slides). And thus, an act utilitarian, when making decisions regarding human life, looks solely at the net difference in wellbeing and ill-being. I would like to call attention to the impersonality — which I believe to be the strongest objection to act utilitarianism— that results from this process of quantifying happiness, as it disregards perspectives of the individual as well as the intrinsic value of human life. Take, for example, the moral dilemma caused by the fat man in the trolley problem as presented by Thomson in “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The situation with the fat man is essentially as follows:…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A runaway trolley will kill five people if it stays on its current path. I have the option to pull a lever and divert the trolley to an alternate track. In this case, it will only kill one person. What should I do? This is the trolley problem, a classic thought experiment whose outcome has numerous applications.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This makes me think of a parent trying to help their kid study. I know whenever my dad would try to help me with homework it would just confuse me further and cause me to be upset. While my dad was tutoring me believing that it was good will, it didn’t have a good outcome. The utilitarian approach also applies to the Trolley problem. Choosing to let one man die over five because you think it’ll cause a happier outcome is technically moral according to Mill.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    ”A majority of people agree that they would rather kill the one man in order to save the lives of five because they believe in utilitarianism, which is the idea that the greatest good will come from benefitting the greatest number of people. (Edmonds 69). However, a majority of people additionally agree that it is unethical to divert the direction of the oncoming train to kill the man. In order to demonstrate to the reader familiarity with these notions for granted. Edmonds draws numerous connections between the trolleyology and a variety of significant philosophical ideas and debates to highlight similar ideas that is apparent throughout…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is interesting because it takes primarily a consequentialist approach to ethic looking at the ends to something and looks at the pros or cons of an action, or what causes the most happiness versus the amount of generating pain from an action. Even though it sounds simple to compare the amount of happiness versus pain the equation that we have to use for utilitarianism does not always work the that it should and other flaws that we will go over in this essay taking an unusual stance on the matter, questioning the utility monster but also criticizes utilitarianism later but also saying that it is the best that we have currently have. The idea of a utility monster is not a valid objection against utilitarianism and can be worked…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Egoism: Egoism is the ethical viewpoint that looks only for value as it pertains to you. This value system literally states that it is best to be selfish and only look out for what is good for you. The idea behind egoism is that if everyone acts only for their best interest, then the world becomes a better and more relatable place to live in. From this viewpoint, it is better to extend our lives using any means necessary than to do anything else.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, ethical egoism states that an individual should always act in their own best interest. Ethical egoism is based on the belief that people should act in a way that brings maximum benefits to the individual in making a decision. It also states that the behavior of the individual is to maximize their own self interest and effect on other people is of much less consequences. For instance, those government officials such as LTA officers receives bribe instead of charging the motorist for over speeding or drinking and driving just for their own benefits. They use the same money to buy the lunch or gifts for their family members.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays