The Roman Empire: The Art Of Warfare

Improved Essays
The Impact of The Roman Empire on The Art of Warfare When discussing the history of warfare the importance of the Roman Empire cannot be overstated. An important idea necessary to understanding of this topic, is to first learn the history of the Roman army. Which wasn’t one design dragged out over a long period of time, In-fact I would say its quite the opposite. When Rome was just a small insignificant city state( I know that sounds odd, but its true), at that time they fought in the greek fashion as hoplites in the phalanx formation. Witch didn't work well except when fighting on an open field…Italy isn't know for me being flat plains. Because of the faults of phalanx they developed the maniple system. The maniple system divided the infantry into three different types. First were the hastati who were younger and serving their time in the roman army, they typically wore the cheapest armor. Then we have the principes who were veterans who had survived as hastati or had enough money you became one of these guys..Finally we have the Triarii the oldest and the best. Now comes the most famous reform to the Roman army the one that everyone is the most familiar with… the marian reforms. These reforms took away the requirement that soldiers would pay for their gear upfront,they created a standing army. That change made it easier to join the army and …show more content…
While sizes of centuries and cohorts changed over time,they were still consistent in the fact that they pretty much the same across the board in a legion, except for the first cohort that one was bigger. Modern armies adhere to the same principle, a company could a 120 men and battalion could be something like 700 men, it's the same principle.This was a major revaluation… to the alternative of the time witch was mad dash towards your enemy…not the best plan especially when facing a well disciplined

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There was the initial problem of the number of auxiliary troops who were retiring each year. This was a concern as these troops were in many cases battle-hardened and at their prime who may have had designs of instigating uprisings in their homelands. Emperors from Augustus onwards extended the service requirements to an average of 25 years; this reduced the heavy cost to the treasury of pensions and land. Furthermore, assimilation with the local populace may very well have been encouraged. From the historical sites and the artefacts extracted that in themselves may be limited in initial context they do add to the greater understanding of the period.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, the Western Roman Empire’s military was very weak because it had a lot of problems finding solders and supplying the funds to pay for their military needs. According to document 5 it says that the reason there was a “military crisis” was because there was a “lack of children” to grow up and become soldiers. In document 8 it says that it was hard to recruit troops so they were “reduced to hiring Germanic Soldiers.” This rally took a toll of the “state’s budget” at the same time as the “declining…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although they have a lot of lands to control, they had to constantly fight to defend their growing empire whilst conquering new land. As a result to this, the Romans needed a powerful army thus having the plebeians (lower rank) to also join the fight by…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome Dbq Analysis

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My class notes say that Rome was having problems with having a loyal and strong army. For example, there were, “military leaders fighting among themselves”(Data Set). Another example was that there were, “troops in battle, exposed to wounds because they have no armor, think about running and not about fighting”(Document 2). Also, “Hosts of senators, bureaucrats, and clergymen were entitled the avoid the draft…”(Document 3). The Romans were so successful that they started laying back.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome Empire Dbq

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mobeen Dost Due Date: Thursday 12-15 500-600 words - 12/14 font Times Roman-types-loaded into managebac Final Essay: What caused the fall of the rome empire. 1. In my essay I will be talking about how Rome fell. My first topic is about how the barbarians caused Rome to fall.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philip the II of Macedon came to the throne after a colossal defeat within a year of him coming to the throne by his brother Perdiccas III, within a year of coming to the throne Philip began to evolve a new Macedonian way of war. One of Philip’s great contributions was to create the army with which Alexander conquered the Persian Empire. He was the first Macedonian King to rearm the Macedonian infantry with a sarissa a long spear 18 feet long, nearly twice as long as the usual spear carried by the usual Greek infantry known as hoplites. In rearming the Macedonian army Philip had to do two things first he had to devise new systems of tactics and weapons and the armaments his innovations reflected a change of tactics that changed the face of warfare until the arrival of the Roman legions. To create this army Philip had to pull off a social economic…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome’s decline can be correlated to military problems of such nature. Disregard for safety and change in training techniques led to lack of heavy armor and sufficient preparation. The Roman military fought without any protection and therefore, many were killed while engaging in battle (Document B). Because of the military’s laziness, soldiers died more easily and weren’t as prepared. If the military hadn’t become brash and overconfident in themselves because of their latest victories, not as many soldiers would have been killed.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Of equal importance, the Roman army was well organized and structured. Furthermore, the smallest part of the Roman army was a conturenium. Ten contureniums made a cohort, and so on. This is also a major part of Rome's military success. Overall, Ancient Rome would receive an…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The empire may still be striving today if the Roman soldiers would have remained diligent, still practicing their marches. Growing accustomed to their armor so they could actually wear it in combat.. If it weren’t for the lack of natural borders in the large empire the Huns may not have been able to inundate the land.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They were a big factor in the rise of the Roman Empire. The military of Rome was only open for male citizens that lived in the country. The military also tried to keep their focus on teamwork, and not individual power, unlike other countries did. The next part of this comparison is the military from the Mongolian Empire, headed by Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan used his mind to make up strategies to use against his opponents.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, Enemies of the Roman Order was a well-written book that analyzed each enemy the Roman Empire faced over time. This book developed logically with sections that proceeded by theme and within these sections proceeded chronologically through the time period. With an identifiable thesis to display the types of enemies to the Roman Order and their effect on the government and the society, MacMullen proves his point to the…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clientage was a moral agreement, unlike Rome and Persia whose slaves were basically property. War and army were vital to the success of Rome, men were prompted to join in return for land, or other riches (Kagan, Ozment ,Turner, Frank, 2011. The Roman army was different from the Persia in the ways technique, skill and organization. Rome’s army, like Greece’s was well organized and…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pompey’s conquests sparking Caesar’s alliance with Crassus and eventual military takeover was the cause for a thinned troop force. With growing opposition surrounding them, generals thought that they could keep Rome a military superpower, but they forgot about the problems within the Roman Republic. No longer was the primary focus of a growing republic agricultural development and commerce, but now is military superiority. Revolts could not change the minds of these power hungry generals who even began reducing upper class pay to fill the void of money they had from ambitious militant campaigns. The resulting uprisings did nothing but hurt the unity of the republic even further.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Controlling the legions from the central authority located in Rome became a problem. Due to worsening of the economic situation, the requirement of high taxes to substitute the need for money that once used to come from the conquered…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just like Greece, ancient Rome also used cavalry to defeat their enemies, but Rome had saddles and later on in time got stirrups. In contrast to Greece, Rome’s men got supplied equipment and weapons based on their wealth. They were broken down into five groups. Hoplites was the wealthiest group and the men got helmets,…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays