The economy of the Mexican state declined dramatically during the early 1980s. Many economists suspect that this downturn was due to Mexico’s state capitalism and import substitution industrialization. State capitalism is an economic system in which for-profit economic activity is controlled by the state. Import substitution industrialization is an economic policy that is based on the idea that a country should rely on local industrialized products instead of products garnered through foreign trade. Since 1980, direct government intervention and participation in the productive economy substantially diminished, notably through a vast privatization program. In the 1980s and early 1990s, the focus was shifted towards economic policies that favor
…show more content…
In response to critical situations, the presidency had the ability to deliver “policy shocks”. Under normal circumstances, the Chief Executive had the power to bring about substantive policy change even if it involved the amending of the Constitution. According to the Mexican Constitution, the role of the president of the Republic is more that of a guardian of policy stability than a promoter of policy change. However, for a long time, while PRI hegemony lasted, the policy-making process was centralized in the executive branch. The president was the prime source of policy change and Congress remained subordinated to the presidential initiative. As a matter of fact, Congress had a certain influence, but not the ability to stop the president.The transition from authoritarianism to democracy involved the dismantling of the hegemonic party system. Through a long and complex process that gained momentum after the 1988 presidential elections, the political hegemony of a single party gave way to a competitive three-party system. This development changed the balance of power within Congress and the role of the executive branch in the policy making process even before the old hegemonic party lost the presidency of the Republic in 2000. In the 1997 mid-term elections, the PRI lost for the first time since its foundation in 1929, its majority in the Chamber of Deputies. Alternation of power in the …show more content…
Throughout decades, the PRI monopolized access to elective offices and appointive positions in the administration in the federal, state and municipal governments to dominate the political system. Mexico has a multitude of political parties, however, there are three that are extremely popular. The first is the PRI (mentioned above) which is a centrist party with members of great prominence. Its platform represented the institutionalization of the new power structure that had emerged as a result of the Mexican Revolution. The second political party is the National Action Party (PAN) which is a right of center party that advocates for free-enterprise and small government. The third major party is The Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) which is a left of center party. The PRD considers democracy to be the most fundamental principle that it hopes to establish in
In response to critical situations, the presidency had the ability to deliver “policy shocks”. Under normal circumstances, the Chief Executive had the power to bring about substantive policy change even if it involved the amending of the Constitution. According to the Mexican Constitution, the role of the president of the Republic is more that of a guardian of policy stability than a promoter of policy change. However, for a long time, while PRI hegemony lasted, the policy-making process was centralized in the executive branch. The president was the prime source of policy change and Congress remained subordinated to the presidential initiative. As a matter of fact, Congress had a certain influence, but not the ability to stop the president.The transition from authoritarianism to democracy involved the dismantling of the hegemonic party system. Through a long and complex process that gained momentum after the 1988 presidential elections, the political hegemony of a single party gave way to a competitive three-party system. This development changed the balance of power within Congress and the role of the executive branch in the policy making process even before the old hegemonic party lost the presidency of the Republic in 2000. In the 1997 mid-term elections, the PRI lost for the first time since its foundation in 1929, its majority in the Chamber of Deputies. Alternation of power in the …show more content…
Throughout decades, the PRI monopolized access to elective offices and appointive positions in the administration in the federal, state and municipal governments to dominate the political system. Mexico has a multitude of political parties, however, there are three that are extremely popular. The first is the PRI (mentioned above) which is a centrist party with members of great prominence. Its platform represented the institutionalization of the new power structure that had emerged as a result of the Mexican Revolution. The second political party is the National Action Party (PAN) which is a right of center party that advocates for free-enterprise and small government. The third major party is The Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) which is a left of center party. The PRD considers democracy to be the most fundamental principle that it hopes to establish in