This article discusses the under evaluation of the effects of war carried out by the United States military. Although there is much debate about foreign policy, there isn’t must justification for our nation’s wars. As the Iraq war grew unpopular, the analytical focus shifted deficiencies in intelligence analysis, war-planning, and counterinsurgency doctrine. There is not much focus on the theories of democratization, energy security, non-proliferation, and of failed states justifying the war and occupation. As the studies are focused on being cost efficient, recent U.S. wars proven that overthrowing dictators ruling over fractious organizations might cause lasting conflicts rather than stability, let alone liberal democracy. Knowing this trend,
…show more content…
What are the answers to the questions? The primacy cause of limited evaluation of war was expressed in the summary. Relative power support primacy in two ways: it distributes the human and material costs of hawkish policies, withdrawing their elected officials. Military protect the majority of Americans from threats, which allow Americans not to be overly concerned about wars. With this protection, security policy tends to rank low among voters’ concerns and politicians have little reason to cater to voters’ foreign-policy views. They have the tendency to take on undemocratic attitude. Another way relative power support primacy is by focusing its benefits and creating organizations and interest group to promote it. “The primacy supporters are concerned about the credibility of the numerous promises the United States makes to defend allies. They fear the large number of weapon technology, especially nuclear weapons. Especially in the Beltway, they tend to argue that internal conditions abroad—foreign civil wars, failed states, or illiberal government-can undermine U. S. global leadership, creating danger” (Friedman, 2016). The role of the “independent think tank” is about raising money and advertizing to gain access to an influential audience. They very seldom do evaluations, mainly because they serve the political system instead of directing …show more content…
Discuss the stakeholders, organizations, and people who are impacted by the public policy as well as how the different levels of government interact as a result of the legislation (federal, state, and local)? Everyone is affected by War! War has effects on our taxes, local and state policies, religions, neighboring countries, allies, and the future. No one expected this war to last this long, take up so much money, and have such little positive effects. Every day living in DC as you commute on public transportation you may fear for your life. Muslims have been banned, discriminated, and abused even with no relation to terror groups. More and more families are sending off their strong men to lose them, their mind and or leg. Most noticeably by everyone is that war consumes most of our taxes. With the U.S. so dominate in the United States more and More Anti American/ Western Civilization groups and people are uprising. This article, and the war or terror itself should tell congress they need a new methodology on settling foreign
What are the answers to the questions? The primacy cause of limited evaluation of war was expressed in the summary. Relative power support primacy in two ways: it distributes the human and material costs of hawkish policies, withdrawing their elected officials. Military protect the majority of Americans from threats, which allow Americans not to be overly concerned about wars. With this protection, security policy tends to rank low among voters’ concerns and politicians have little reason to cater to voters’ foreign-policy views. They have the tendency to take on undemocratic attitude. Another way relative power support primacy is by focusing its benefits and creating organizations and interest group to promote it. “The primacy supporters are concerned about the credibility of the numerous promises the United States makes to defend allies. They fear the large number of weapon technology, especially nuclear weapons. Especially in the Beltway, they tend to argue that internal conditions abroad—foreign civil wars, failed states, or illiberal government-can undermine U. S. global leadership, creating danger” (Friedman, 2016). The role of the “independent think tank” is about raising money and advertizing to gain access to an influential audience. They very seldom do evaluations, mainly because they serve the political system instead of directing …show more content…
Discuss the stakeholders, organizations, and people who are impacted by the public policy as well as how the different levels of government interact as a result of the legislation (federal, state, and local)? Everyone is affected by War! War has effects on our taxes, local and state policies, religions, neighboring countries, allies, and the future. No one expected this war to last this long, take up so much money, and have such little positive effects. Every day living in DC as you commute on public transportation you may fear for your life. Muslims have been banned, discriminated, and abused even with no relation to terror groups. More and more families are sending off their strong men to lose them, their mind and or leg. Most noticeably by everyone is that war consumes most of our taxes. With the U.S. so dominate in the United States more and More Anti American/ Western Civilization groups and people are uprising. This article, and the war or terror itself should tell congress they need a new methodology on settling foreign