The Role Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

Superior Essays
Plato’s The Republic brings the idea of what truly is justice. Is it what society see it to be, what one sees it to be, or is justice such an aloof ideal that man is still trying to comprehend what exactly justice is to one’s soul. On the terms of understanding justice one must also think if they need justice and if so what it means to them. The value they hold to justice is something such as an intrinsic good which Plato elaborates on in The Republic where the definition and need for justice is looked upon. The definitions of justice evaluated in the book can show how the value of changes depending on the definition from Cephalus’ to other members of the party to Plato’s definition. The intrinsic value that justice possibly holds for societies and for mankind and what it could mean without justice. It must also be examined if the need for justice as a good is worth the changes that it could in society. After these issues are assessed then it can be shown how Plato proves that justice is an intrinsic good for society, mankind, and the soul of man.
Before we can describe justice and show that Plato proves it is an intrinsic good, we have to understand what intrinsic is in this setting, and how it would apply to justice. For this setting, the meaning of intrinsic will be something that is essential and naturally belongs. Therefore in this setting, if justice is an intrinsic good then it would be said justice is necessary in all parts of
…show more content…
The definition of justice which comes from Socrates is when one “doesn’t let each part in him mind other people’s business,” conveying the idea justice is the idea of one doing one’s job and staying to that job. With the definition of justice clarified by Socrates it can now be shown how he proves it to be an intrinsic good for not only society as a whole by for the individuals in this

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato initially sets out to define justice, and in this quest, illustrates the ideal society. His entire philosophy is based on the idea of parts coming together towards the whole. This applies to both the just person as well as the model state. In…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Plato believed that justice is good in itself, or “an intrinsic good”. He showed this by arguing in the Republic that justice is an essential part of living a happy life. In the Republic, Plato separates the soul into three parts he calls reason, spirit, and appetite. A moral or just person would be a person whose soul is functioning in equilibrium.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Thrasymachus’ Conception on Justice In Friedrich Nietzsche’s work, The Genealogy of Morality, he states that the existence of laws establishes what is just and unjust within a given society (Nietzsche 1280; sec 12). Thus, there does not seem to be anything explicitly virtuous for justice. In reference to the Republic, I will argue Socrates and Thrasymachus have different views on justice and will ultimately disagree with each other on Nietzsche 's conception of justice. Nietzsche’s entire work is trying to dissect morality from its origins.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon Vs Socrates

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In conclusion, this paper presented the nature of justice, Glaucon’s argument for injustice, Socrates arguments for justice and a subjective elaboration on justice. The nature of justice is the best and worst of justice. Glaucon conclusion that that unjust is better than just, because of the instant awards and perks. Socrates felt that justice would need to be found within the individual.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Justice can be described as “minding your own business.” The state and the ruler is just when its three classes or parts execute its own duties and do not interfere with each other. Therefore, injustice must be the opposite or as Socrates says, “…it must be a kind of civil war between the three parts, a meddling and doing of another ’s work, a rebellion by some part against the whole soul in order to rule it inappropriately (Plato…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    n Plato 's Republic, an analogy is struck between the state of the city and the state of the soul. While, in the latter case, a well balanced, or just, soul is one that is commanded by reason, and in which the spirited and appetitive parts of the soul play subordinate roles, a well balanced, or just, city is one in which the rulers are commanded by reason, the soldiers by spirit, and the laymen by appetites. The difficulty implicit in this state of affairs is that it does not appear, on reflection, that the so-called just city is truly just, since it would make better sense to say that a just city is one in which everyone has a just soul, rather than to anatomize the city in precisely the manner that the soul is, and on that basis call the…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elaborating the Definition of Justice Plato, the Republic is about the history of political thought, it includes long conversations and arguments among several intellects. Thrasymachus, a fierce fighter, argues that justice is what is good for the stronger and that the unjust man lives a more profitable life than the just man does. Socrates, Plato’s teacher, play the role in defending justice in all these arguments. He praises justices for itself and its consequences. Next, Glaucon and Adeimantus, sons of Ariston, restore Thrasymachus’s argument in a different prospect of perfectly unjust life is better than a perfectly just life.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Vs Judeo

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His works resonate with critiques of democracy and the pursuit of justice. His thoughts and teachings are deeply embedded with a singular question of what does it mean to be good? Often using his mentor and teacher, Socrates as the main character and focal point of his dialogues, Plato’s writings burn with the desire of a man trying to reconcile ‘right and…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato was an early Greek philosopher who instituted the Academy and is most well-known for his writings of unparalleled influence. Throughout his life, Plato had written many dialogues over numerous subjects, some being justice, epistemology, political philosophy, and even theology. One of Plato’s most successful and widely read dialogues was the Republic. Before the Republic, many of Plato’s dialogues consisted of a speaker, Socrates, refuting the positions of his interlocutors, and many of the dialogues do not end with an adequate answer. However, the Republic delivers a position in which Socrates takes on justice and its relation to happiness.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These analogies relate justice to professions and animals in an attempt to refine the definition Socrates seeks. Socrates ultimately comes to the conclusion that justice cannot be “to give each what is owed to him.” Socrates and Polemarchus both agree that because it is never just to hurt another man, to give each man--be he good or bad--what he “owes” is fundamentally unjust. The philosopher is closer to a definition of justice because he can reject Polemarchus’ assertion as a potential answer to the query “what is justice?” However, I take issue with Socrates’ theory of justice as a craft, and further, the idea that hurting another is never just on account of Socrates’ weak analogies and vague…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Let’s discuss the first subject – what justice is and what its origins are. http://missiontotransition.blogspot.ca/2013/11/why-be-moral-plato-republic-book-ii.html.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, the images of justice are perceived differently between several characters in this novel. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, all present contrasting ideals of justice compared to the one envisioned by Socrates. Using the art of rhetoric, Socrates utilizes argumentation to identify the faults in each individual’s vision of justice, and how his unconventional perception of justices can change their entire society. The first vision of justice discussed in The Republic was Cephalus. Cephalus describes justice as honesty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays