Fortinbras In Hamlet

Superior Essays
If you were to read Hamlet to someone who was completely ignorant of the play and to whom Hamlet or Shakespeare were, what would they think of it? A tragic, captivating play filled with adultery, the deaths of eight, a mad woman, and supernatural encounters. Not knowing the play was a work of the literary genius known as Shakespeare, you would be lead to believe the play would be another tragedy filled with blood and death from which the plot was centered on; redemption. If this were true, would the reader not question as to why Hamlet didn’t immediately follow the orders from the ghost and avenge his father? The answer is simple; action is complex. In the story, the character of Fortinbras is introduced as a device to highlight Hamlet’s indecision …show more content…
Hamlet, the Danish Prince, is extremely thoughtful, strategic, and slow to act. The Norwegian Prince Fortinbras, however, is brash and very quick to act with little thought involved. In Act 4, Scene IV, Hamlet encounters Fortinbras’ Captain, whom is on his way to seek permission from Claudius to allow the safe passage of the Norwegian army through Denmark on their way to attack Poland. When Hamlet inquires to the reason of the invasion, he is informed the fight is over “a little patch of land that hath in it no profit but thy name” (Act.IV, Scene.IV, 98-99). Upon hearing this, Hamlet marvels in astonishment at the idea of such a bloody war over something so insignificant. Hamlet measures himself against Fortinbras, calling himself a coward through not avenging his father’s death in a timely manner. Inspired by the Norwegian Princes’ brash actions, Hamlet declares that “Oh, from this time forth, my thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth!”(Act 4, Scene 4, 65-66). This inspiration re-focuses Hamlet on the main task of avenging his father’s death by murdering Claudius. It becomes apparent throughout the play that Shakespeare not only wants the reader to compare Hamlet to Fortinbras, but Hamlet himself to Fortinbras. In many ways, Hamlet and Fortinbras are very similar, for example: both men’s fathers have been killed, both men’s uncles are …show more content…
Though it is his longest story, it is also considered the most captivating. The story challenges the reader to read between the lines and understand the underlying messages throughout the play. Lessons, according to Hamlet, to take away from the play would be: The world’s a prison, never trust your friends, you’ll never understand women, and the only truth is found through illusion. The complexity of action is a reoccurring theme throughout the story, as we often see Hamlet holding himself next to the brash Norwegian prince Fortinbras, and his quick actions. In Shakespeare’s greatest revenge drama, we see how Hamlet is inspired by Fortinbras, how Fortinbras was a literary tool used to foil prince Hamlet, and how Hamlet’s thoughtfulness came both at an advantage and disadvantage to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Most movies and books in this day and age have simple plots with miniscule character development, but this is not the case in Hamlet, by William Shakespeare. Shakespeare uses foils that the viewer has to dig into in order to see what he is trying to convey, which increases the understanding of the play. The foils are created between three similar characters––Fortinbras, Laertes and Hamlet––that emphasize where they deviate from each other on specific traits. Even if one reads into all of the details they will still be thrown by the eventual, unpredictable, ending of the play. Shakespeare creates a new way to view masculinity by using both classical and modern interpretations of important character traits, defined by these foils, to show why Fortinbras is the only one left standing by the end of the play.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference between the two characters is that Hamlet wasted time and did not act immediately, but Fortinbras took immediate action. Fortinbras could summon up the the passion and courage to fight for virtually no gain, simply to carry out his plan to avenge his father. Hamlet even swears that now he will finally do it and declares that “from this time forth,/[his] thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth” but incredibly, still succumbs to inaction (4.4.68-9). In the end, Fortinbras lives, and Hamlet dies, and we are left to modify the theme of action over inaction to conclude that immediate, righteous action surmounts both inaction and vengeful, poorly thought out action or…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An heir to the Danish throne versus the heir to the Norwegian throne. Who is more suited to rule a country, conquer lands, and command subjects? We have Hamlet, a young man hell bent on avenging his father’s death and young Fortinbras, seemingly, chasing the same dream. One deems to stealthily eliminate his adversary while another marches forward unafraid. What distinguishes Fortinbras from Hamlet?…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, the plan fails due to the fact the Queen mistakenly takes from the poison filled cup. Both are wounded and ended up to the downfall of everyone involved. While Hamlet and Laertes set to be on the opposite direction, however, Fortinbras seems to be more in middle between Hamlet and Laertes. When Fortinbra's found out his father was killed by King Hamlet, he carefully planned his action and act according. He showed he was not reckless and didn't held back to seek vengeance on his father's death.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adversity In Hamlet

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Hamlet encounters a Captain of the Norwegian army, he inquires about the reason for the great military presence in the area. The captain explains to him that Prince Fortinbras ordered the mobilisation of the military to attack and capture a useless area of land that once belonged to Norway. In the soliloquy that follows, Hamlet displays his jealousy towards Fortinbas’ decisiveness, pondering about how one could be willing to fight, and risk his men’s lives over a virtually worthless goal, when he himself hasn’t achieved anything despite having adequate reason and opportunity. Inspired, he then decides to remove all sense of moral ambiguity, and vows concentrate solely on enacting revenge on Claudius. The revelation that Hamlet experiences, displays his understanding that his largest source of adversity is his own morality.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foils In Hamlet

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Laertes, Horatio, Young Fortinbras— each character’s similarities and differences serve to create parallels and contrast to draw attention to Hamlet’s differences and accentuate the true nature of his character…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    can see how Hamlet fails in avenging his father's horrible and unnatural murder. Hamlet is considered to be a tragic hero because he possesses many tragic flaws and one makes the fatal mistakes which eventually delay his plan of revenge. He overthinks and over-analyzes the appearance of his father's ghost and does not see many opportunities given to him to take revenge upon his uncle Claudius. When Hamlet finally does enact his revenge in the final scene, he does so only because he knows he will die, and because it is his last…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet Anti Hero Analysis

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hamlet is portrayed as a gritty anti-hero with human flaws and qualities such as arrogance, apathy and paranoia, which are revealed in his hamartia and peripeteia. Hamlet’s selfishness fuels his revenge against Claudius but he follows through intelligently, but arrogantly as he refuses to consider the welfare of others. Hamlet’s revenge triggered a series of remorseless murders in the name of his father. The constant surveillance on Hamlet instigated his constant paranoia of being watched and plotted against because his trust was always betrayed. Gertrude’s hasty marriage and Duncan’s surreptitious murder infuriates Hamlet’s enough to feel obligated to avenge his father’s death mercilessly while demonstrating anti-heroic qualities of hamartia…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These parallels further show the destructiveness of revenge. Fortinbras and Hamlet are faced with very similar situations in which they feel the need to avenge their father’s death. Fortinbras however, unlike Hamlet is successful in his revenge because fate, or rather good luck, not the pursuit of revenge, gives him what he wants. In the end he is shown as the most likely heir to the Denmark throne and with this, he insists “I have some rights of memory in this kingdom, which now to claim my vantage doth invite me” (4.5.149-151). Proving that getting revenge is not the way to succeed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The characterizing difference between Hamlet and Fortinbras is his approach in dealing with the trauma as he redirects his anger from achieving self-gain alone; to achieving both self and national gain due to his character of leadership, ambition, and being unequivocal. Firstly, Fortinbras is a natural leader compared to Hamlet because he is able to unite a group of countrymen from the outskirts of Norway to conquer the lost territories of Norway. (Hamlet) This is observable by the effect on the national security of Denmark that this leadership of Fortinbras has when Marcellus…

    • 2164 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The lust for power In the play “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” by William Shakespeare the drama of conflict between Prince of Norway Hamlet and his uncle the king Claudius takes center stage. The Prince of Denmark seeks revenge after the ghost of his father revels to him that his uncle king Claudius was the one who murdered him. Claudius is a king who is an ambition and cunning political figure that will do anything to stay in power. He is the essential figure that causes so much pain and despair throughout the play.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hamlet was quick to understand that he was entitled to avenge his father’s death. This shows that many are frequently influenced by the voice in our head that tells us to do something even when we know we should not. Although Hamlet was convinced he must retaliate against his father’s death, he insisted on gaining proof before killing Claudius due to Horatio’s belief that the ghost was an evil spirit, “Which might deprive your sovereignty of reason / and draw you into madness? Think of it” (1.4.76-77). Hamlet did not want the people of Denmark to believe that he was so evil to be plotting to kill his stepdad with his proof coming from a dead soul.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hamlet by William Shakespeare is full of plotting, cunning, and unfortunate instances where choices lead from one unsavory consequence to another. Sin is the primary instigator and end result of these actions and reactions. Marcellus rightfully states, “something is rotten in the state of Denmark” describing the ruling family’s influence on the state of Denmark. The air of corruption is present because of the moral decay and disease rampant among the characters.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He tells his son that while he was sleeping, Claudius poured poison into his ear. Hamlet is shocked by the ghosts words. The ghost asks Hamlet to “Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder.” (I.5.25) Prince Hamlet vow’s to avenge his father’s death, and promises not hurt his mother even though he blame’s her for re-marrying to his uncle right after his father’s death. Since the revenge was requested, and not Prince Hamlet’s own decision, we could question if Hamlet would consider avenging his father, even if he wasn’t told to.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the play, Hamlet meets the ghost of his father who informs him of his murder. Then the ghost asks Hamlet to take revenge which leads him into a confusing state of whether or not he should listen or handle the situation in a different way (1.4-5.19-28). As a result, the knowledge…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics