Political Science Application Essay

Improved Essays
Thank you for providing me the space to explain why I want to pursue my PhD in Political Science. In this brief statement I will explain my major research interests, why I believe those areas are both academically and politically significant, and why I would like to attend your program. In my graduate studies I would like to pursue research on the role and influence of ancient political thought on early modern political thought and how that has shaped our contemporary political context. I am interested both in how the ideas of ancient philosophy influenced the development of political thought in the west and in how the idea of the ancients was used by thinkers to develop their own political programs. In the vast topic of ancient and early modern …show more content…
One example of how I have used the history of political thought to address pressing political issues in the past is in my honors thesis. In that paper I focused on the role of myth and religion in the justification for political authority. I relied on Plato’s Republic to formulate a critique of Carl Schmitt’s concept of Political Theology and to look for an alternative role for myth or religion in foundations of political authority. Ernst Cassirer’s work, Myth of the State, argued that Plato’s Republic formed the foundation of the Legal State, or a movement against myth as a foundation for State authority. Cassirer’s history of political thought, much liked Schmitt’s, was a story of secularization of state power. I argued rather that the Republic offered an alternative means to use the power of myth and religion to justify political authority without the authoritarianism of Schmitt. I found that by reconstructing a history of political thought contrary to Cassirer’s I was able to show an alternative solution to Cassirer and Schmitt’s conflict over the proper role for theological concepts in justifying state

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Schmitt draws several similarities between the power of the sovereign and God or theology, the most prominent of which is that they are equivalent parallels to each other in the basis of their power. Both God and the sovereign have unlimited power, and can use it to do lead and command those under their power. Because God and the sovereign are parallel equals, people are capable of rebelling against each in the same way, which can be described by fighting God by fighting the state. By fighting the sovereign they are under, they are effectively pressuring against any higher power, which would include God. Through the notion that all significant concepts of the state are secularized theological concepts, it can be concluded that society can push…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Assignment I: Political Continuum Lluvia Herrera Policy I: Understanding Social Welfare Policy Wichita State University Assignment I: Political Continuum After taking the Political Typology quiz my results described me as hard-pressed skeptic. When reading the description I can say that I agree with some of it, for example I am distrustful of the government because I don't believe that they are corrupt and do what is best for a specific group of individuals and not the entire United States. I definitely lean more to the Democratic side, I believe that good things come with hard work, however; I also believe that some individuals need extra help to get things to happen.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A current, but certainly not new, public policy issue is the debate that follows when a clash occurs between government and religion. In Obama’s Reformation, Adam J. White examines in detail many of the current debates ongoing in America today; from the current administration’s assault on Christian values, to what it means to the average citizen, and what we are likely to see in the near future. Socrates gave the philosophy of a democratic form of government to us, via Plato’s Republic. Aristotle, in the Rhetoric, taught us “the preservation of the city lies within its laws”.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “The Godless Constitution” illustrates how the Constitution created a secular state. The author states an argument upon the idea of “separation and church”. The argument relates to the point that the creation of a godless constitution was not an act of irreverence, rather it was an act of confidence in religion. The founders of this nation wanted to regard the mixing and politics. Therefore, government matters is not neutral in religious and moral matters.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Science of Machiavelli Machiavelli’s analytical tone and calculating demeanor, along with relevant historical examples to back up his claims, make his approach to politics extremely scientific. He sets up a foundation of effective practices for leaders to utilize, and his lack of concern for moral issues allow his work to transcend older political thought. He focuses on the preservation of the state as the main objective of a leader, and he advocates all means necessary to achieve that goal. The first scientific aspect of Machiavelli’s work that differentiates it from other political discourse is the fact that he thinks religion should have no place in the workings of a government.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A political party is an organization of people which seeks to achieve goals common to its members through the acquisition and exercise of political power. In present times it’s mostly associated with the fight for votes and debates between Democrats and Republicans. Several years ago though when political parties did not exist, many were angry that they did not. Although people like George Washington fear that it would split the nation apart and weaken public support of the new constitution, . In document 4, the excerpt from “The Farewell Address”, George Washington opposed to political parties because “ It agitates the community with ill founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one party against another; foments[stirs up]…….…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘In the social sciences, the most general concept of power links it to the ability to achieve a desired outcome’ (Heywood 2004). Power is a heavily contested concept amongst humans and has always been present within political thought throughout all eras. It is, in most cases, outlined as the capability to impose authority upon both individuals, and the masses within a state or territorial region, in order to control or influence decisions and their effects. This essay will discuss the similarities in the analysis of political power between two key philosophers from the 16th and 17th century who are thought to have founded features of modern-day political science. Both Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes specialised in theorising the idea…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli wrote his Discourses on Livy in 1517, as a response to the Roman historian Livy, in which he goes in depth about his take on republican ideals, including the guardianship of liberty, the effects of religion on the state, and the danger of conspiracies against the sovereign. He argues about who should be responsible for guarding the liberty of the republic, whether or not this power should reside with the people or the noble classes, using the political structure of ancient Rome and of Venice as evidence for his theories. In chapter 12, Machiavelli elaborates on the causes of the disunity of the Italian state, and why religion is responsible for this, being that the Church is both to weak to hold supreme hold over Italy and yet too…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A democracy is a government that is ruled by the people. This means that we as people choose our own presidents, mayors, senators, and other people of power. A democracy is different from other forms of government because it is actually “ran” by the people. Its main purpose is to not be a monarchy which is a government that is led by a monarch like a queen or king, where the power stays in the family. The Electoral College was founded in 1787 by our founding fathers, It was established to make sure that our government doesn't turn into a monarchy.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern democracy, political parties and interest groups play a huge projecting role in the United States government and it is rising quickly. Political parties and interest groups are organized groups of people who work towards specific goals within the government, promoting politicians and raising money to help accomplish certain needs. While yes, both groups are working towards similar goals they often times serve different purposes within the country’s political system. The real question is whether or not either of these groups are helping improve America or if they are helping to diminish the American political system. The most familiar group known amongst people around the country is the idea of political parties.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The podcast deals with the dialogue “Plato’s Republic” written around 400 BC, which discusses the meaning of justice and what it truly means to be just. Firstly, a background in ancient Greece’s politics was offered, speaking of the appeals and brutal regimes of government prior to democracy being restored. The major issue addressed in the podcast is the execution of Socrates by the majority of Athens for the corruption of youth in and the introduction of gods that the Greeks did not once believe in.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Political Polarization “The unanswered question of American politics in this era is whether our divided political system can function in times of stress” (Ezra Klein). Our political system is comprised of two parties with opposite views on important topics. When the representatives of these parties experience more constraint to vote towards their party 's stance on issues they are less likely to compromise and therefore get less accomplished.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Our concept of Modern Political Thought is mainly a derivative of the 17th and 18th century, whereas Classical Political Thought had its birth before the modern era. As a result, even somewhat politically-adept modern citizens seldom draw upon ‘modern’ philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Plato and Aristotle, who predate both Hobbes and Locke by over a thousand years, are even further from these citizens’ minds. As is stands, many individuals have difficulty finding pertinence in the ‘classics’. However, just because the applicability of Classical Political Thought is not always glaringly obvious, this does not result in an absence of all relevance.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    I. Introduction: topic and each political theorist Throughout history many political thinkers have quoted the words of Niccolo Machiavelli. Founding father, John Adams and philosopher John Locke claimed to be students of Machiavelli (Viroli Intro). Machiavelli is considered a founder of political philosophy, but his work is not without opponents. Leo Strauss, a political philosopher, argued that Machiavelli was a “teacher of evil” in his book Thoughts on Machiavelli, written in 1958, in which he discusses his interpretation of Machiavelli’s work.…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of Cassirer’s writing of “The Myth of the State” is to clarify how myth was able to capture great significance in the political discourse and thought from Europe and particularly from Germany in the first half of the twentieth century. Needless to say, this occurrence was not an accidental one according to Cassirer. He affirms that myth is not a clump of mistakes, but a way of thinking and symbolizing which remains at the origin of human culture. Cassirer’s own conclusion on myth may be summarized as follows: as opposed to art and science which gives us a unity of intuition and thought, “religion and myth gives us a unity of feeling. It begins with the awareness of the universality and fundamental identity of life” (37).…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays