The Ottoman Empire was one of the flourishing empires in Middle East in the period between from 1299 and 1924. The Ottoman Empire overextended from Southwest Asia to Europe and Northern Africa, hence it was a significant trading route (Alderson 20). Several diverse ethnic groups and religious groups settled in the empire. Ottomans Empire flourished until the time the First World War began. Nevertheless, just as any other empire, the Ottoman Empire was meant to collapse t some point. This can be well illustrated or rather explained using various philosophical views such those of Hegel and Toynbee. According to Hegel and Toynbee, the empire fell at the time it was supposed to fall since every empire was bound to collapse at some point when it
…show more content…
They were contrary to the Allied Powers that comprised of England, the United States, France, and Russia. The Central Powers were losing were constantly losing as the war went on.
It is realized that the economic reasons are conjoined or rather coined in the religious reasons that led to the fall of the empire since the conflicts over territories led to diverse religious groups fighting each other to support each other’s side. Religious groups like the Sunni and Shia Muslims began fighting, and ethnic groups like the Kurds and Armenians were separated.
Several reasons clarify the realm 's fall. However, this paper concentrates on the religious clarification of the fall of decay of the Ottoman Empire. There is another essential component clarifying the reasons of Ottoman decay. It is the absence of receptivity. Islamic development was significantly persuaded of its prevalence. This was a brake against the development and execution of new practices. The West began to push forward - new advancements, profound political changes, and scholarly arousing - the European move to innovation and industrialism passed unnoticed by the decision Ottoman class in the seventeenth and mid eighteenth hundreds of …show more content…
They felt so superior not to welcome any sort of change. This led to the Europe side developing and leading to its downfall. I believe that the collapse of the empire was significant to the fact that religious activities had accomplished their mission and hence was meant to shift to other place to achieve. Again, I conquer with the Hegelian perception on the dialectical process of history in that when there is a rise in something, there must be a counter attack, which is the fall of the
They were contrary to the Allied Powers that comprised of England, the United States, France, and Russia. The Central Powers were losing were constantly losing as the war went on.
It is realized that the economic reasons are conjoined or rather coined in the religious reasons that led to the fall of the empire since the conflicts over territories led to diverse religious groups fighting each other to support each other’s side. Religious groups like the Sunni and Shia Muslims began fighting, and ethnic groups like the Kurds and Armenians were separated.
Several reasons clarify the realm 's fall. However, this paper concentrates on the religious clarification of the fall of decay of the Ottoman Empire. There is another essential component clarifying the reasons of Ottoman decay. It is the absence of receptivity. Islamic development was significantly persuaded of its prevalence. This was a brake against the development and execution of new practices. The West began to push forward - new advancements, profound political changes, and scholarly arousing - the European move to innovation and industrialism passed unnoticed by the decision Ottoman class in the seventeenth and mid eighteenth hundreds of …show more content…
They felt so superior not to welcome any sort of change. This led to the Europe side developing and leading to its downfall. I believe that the collapse of the empire was significant to the fact that religious activities had accomplished their mission and hence was meant to shift to other place to achieve. Again, I conquer with the Hegelian perception on the dialectical process of history in that when there is a rise in something, there must be a counter attack, which is the fall of the