Linear Theory Vs Cyclical Theory

Improved Essays
As each second passes, history is being created, no matter how big or small. History had been passed down by either oral or written text. It is what shapes and defines the humankind since the beginning of humans. Everyone has a different way to understand and record history. Historians have broken down the different ways to study history into different theories. Two of these theories are the Cyclical Theory and the Linear Theory. The Cyclical Theory believes there is no “real” progress being made in history; on the other hand, Linear Theory believes that the world is constantly progressing. But looking back at the history of mankind, patterns emerge from analyzing the rise and fall of ancient civilizations, the spread of religions, and similar …show more content…
The human greed for power is natural, for it’s impossible for any human to not desire for something. In this case, power means the possession of land. With more land, there will be more places for the people to grow as a civilization and more space to farm and gain wealth from trades. For example, the First Crusade started because the Christians wanted to reclaim the Holy Land (Jerusalem) from the Muslims. Even though it was claimed to be for religious purposes, many people believed that the Christian Church wanted to gain social and economic status. The land of Jerusalem is the holy to the three major western religions and located near the water. By controlling Jerusalem, the Christian can further spread its influence. In order to persuade people to join the Crusade, the Church promised a free ticket to heaven, money, and fame. A lot of people joined because they were doing it for their personal interest instead of religious purposes. They greed for the things the Church promised. Another example is the spark of World War II, which was Germany attacking Poland under the command of Adolf Hitler. Hitler had an extreme greed for power and wanted Germany to dominate the world. Because of his thirst for power, he single-handedly ignited World War II by attacking Poland and forcing anyone who was not Aryan into labor camps. His actions caused some of the bloodiest battles mankind has ever seen. The human lust for power and control is the root of all wars in history. A group of people wants something that the other group has so they take it by force and the other group feels the needs to defend themselves so they began a war. It happens again and again throughout history which indicates that the Cyclical Theory is the most definite way to study

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John Fea attempts to answer the question posed in the title of his book, “Why Study History?” He answers this question in eight chapters that talk about the different aspects of history. In chapter one, Fea talks about the role of historians as “revisionists.” Though history can be revealed through simple facts, it is meaningless without a story. Historians try to identify the story behind the facts by following the five C’s: change, context, causality, contingency, and complexity.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    History is a subject based on story telling. Sometimes, it is based off letters and written documents. History is not written down for others to learn in a nonbiased opinion in the present moment. Historians must go through these documents later and decide what is biased, and what is not. They must read about an event from multiple perspectives and try and pick out what happened and what is an opinion.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article “History Still Matters” by Bill Moyers expresses some important concerns in our society over the loss of interest of history and even important events today that we find uninteresting but impact our communities. Throughout the article, Moyers explains the loss of significance, but also shows the reader the subject is crucial for societies to progress and continue to develop. He uses deeper meanings to further interpret the importance of history as well as expressing the reasons he thinks cultures have lost concern and interest for historical events. It is also imperative to realize how history has assembled our concurrent world and the effects we face from historical affairs. For those reasons, we can have our own outlook and interpretations…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    History is always being created, but never changed or altered. Although something may have happened yesterday, today, it is now considered historic. The irony here is that whether it happened a few hours ago, yesterday, last week, or many years ago, it is still considered historic because it is now in the past. As stated by Dr. Drake in many lectures, “history does not necessarily repeat itself, but it does rhyme.” From 1865 to the 2000s, different areas of history have a stronger rhyming scheme than others.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While neither Alexis De Tocqueville, nor Simon Schama, nor Jackson J. Spielvogel’s methodologies create a perfect history of the French Revolution, all provide essential insight into understanding the era. Each of these three historians write extensive volumes investigating the Revolution, yet they contain their own specific flaws and strengths. Literature shapes our historical understanding. A competent and tenacious author writes his history to his audience.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamilton Vs Burr Essay

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    History is ever changing and multi-sided because over the years, people's opinions and perspectives on certain traditions and actions change, new ways of life and items that existed in those times are still being discovered and different interpretations of the same event can influence others' opinions on history. Over the years, people's opinions and perspectives on certain traditions and actions change. For example, in the early 19th century, dueling with guns was socially acceptable and widely practiced, but now, in the 21st century, dueling with guns is no longer a socially acceptable practice. Over the years, people have contemplated the reasons that Hamilton and Burr could've had the duel.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some might say that history might be repeating itself with everything that is going on. There are many things going on in this world with the Syrian refugees that can be compared to what happened in the Holocaust and the Japanese being put in the internment camps. The things that are happening in syria right now and the refugees wanting to leave is similar to what happened with the Jews in Germany. The Holocaust was a very difficult time for the jews.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hitler taking over Europe one country at a time. And Hiroshima; a stunning part of Japan that was bombed in response to Pearl Harbor. Casualties rising and blood spilling, the whole world is heating up to expect the very worst. Looking back on these events now, we can see many similarities between these battles. We can also see many differences.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When looking back at history at history thoroughly there are many events in the past that are considered significant, or hold importances in the advancement of the human race. There are two approaches that are considered when looking into the historical past. The two perspectives are personalistic and naturalistic. The personalistic focuses on an individuals, and believe that the specific individual are the ever changing forces that create historical events. Also that without these extraordinary characters actions or beliefs, historically our lives and society would be pan out differently.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, one can find examples of a nation trying to expand its borders and grow stronger, wealthier, and more influential, but during the High Middle Ages the Catholic Church takes on a mission to take back the Holy Land from Muslim Control. The Crusades are a special event that only occur during the High Middle Ages, and in no other era of history does one find the Catholic Church put together a military campaign to take control another land. While some historians look back upon the Crusades as a purely religious expedition, others consider them to be the conquest of new lands in order to grow in power and wealth. Imperialism within the Middle Ages can be seen as both similar to other ages in history and different because the reasoning…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Causes Of The Crusades

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Roman Catholic Church held more power than any other nation in the medieval era, specifically because of the power of religion at the time. The Church hated opposing religions, so when Islamic factions veered dangerously close on the Trade city of Constantinople, the Church panicked. Hence began The Crusades. The holy cities of Antioch, Jerusalem, and Constantinople were in danger of being infected with the blood of infidels, and the Pope would not tolerate such blasphemy. However, in studies, The Crusades are an excellent example of religious genocides, and show how such actions are inevitable due to human nature.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the most significant differences is that there is no universal truth in history as there is in the natural sciences. In the natural sciences when something is discovered, the experiment is repeated several times by multiple people to be certain that the findings were true and not a fluke. Once the discoveries are proven, it becomes the accepted fact and that fact is most of the time undisputed, but in history more is left up to interpretation. An important event that happened can have many differing views on how it occurred and what were the major influences that caused it. “It’s part of historical consciousness to learn the same thing: that there is no “correct” interpretation of the past, but that the act of interpreting is itself a vicarious enlargement of experience from which you can benefit” (Gaddis, 10).…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carr Vs Elton Analysis

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    History is composed of an objective reality that can neither be interpreted in different ways nor can…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why the Crusades were started Crusades began as a series of some religious wars which the Latin Church sanctioned between the periods of 11th to 16th centuries. The aim of coming up with crusades was to save Jerusalem from the Islamic rule at that time. As much as crusades were for advancing the cause of Christ, they began as a way to free the Christians from the Islamic rule and force. This research paper explains all the crusades that started in Europe and determines if the crusades signify Christian worldviews.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Now that we are at the end of the Spring 2016 semester, it is time to reflect on the History Department’s exciting year. I don’t normally like to turn my back on people, but I wanted to model the History Student Association’s new t-shirt. Not only do I like the shirt, I believe that our students came up with a wonderful way of describing what it is that we as historians do and are. We are scholars who are “in-betweeners.” “Our minds are in the past, our bodies in the present, and our aspirations in the future.”…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays