People Are Divided By Politics And Religion Analysis

Improved Essays
As the year of 2016 concludes, we approach what is one of the greatest contests in American history: the presidential campaign. This competition repeats itself in a four year cycle, and every election year one of the either Democratic or Republican candidate defeats the other. Eventually, this person becomes the president of the United States and is able to influence all of the laws and regulations. Why do Americans seem to be divided along moral lines? What makes somebody pro-life or pro-choice? What makes religious values different from secular ones? Jonathan Haidt, author of The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, mentions the six moral foundations of a human being. Differences in basic morals cause differences in human tendencies which have evolved to form a mixture of opinions over secularism and religion as well as within politics. Despite these differences, one basic idea of working together has kept all of humanity together. …show more content…
For example, the people in ancient India were far different from the people in ancient Greece or Rome. However, the basic morals of people remained the same because, for the most part, they were based on religion. People regard religion highly, and because most of the major world religions and philosophies, such as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, etc., involved doing good deeds to others, humans held a certain set of rules and values that they followed in accordance with these religions. This led to the eventual creation of the theory of the six moral foundations of humans, made by Jonathan Haidt, the “care, fairness, loyalty, authority, sanctity, and liberty foundations”(Haidt

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson (the first US Secretary of State, its second Vice President, and third President) and John Adams (the first US Vice President and its second President) are two of the most influential authors on the Declaration of Independence. But their religious views differ greatly. Jefferson believes Jesus ‘perhaps the greatest of history’s moral teachers’ but he doesn’t subscribe to the religiously fundamental view. Or as Schama puts it, Jefferson doesn’t believe Jesus to be a ‘water-walking, corpse-resuscitator’. He believes the new state of America should be guided by the morality of Christianity, but not be regulated by its religion.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One particular debate that has bedeviled humanity since its inception is the question of the nature of human morality. We as humans argue about the source of morality: most religious fundamentalists argue that morality comes from a deity, whereas secularists tend to argue that morality comes from within and is subjective. We also argue about its objectivity, and many will attest that their moral code is a paragon above all others. Morality is a code by which most sane humans live their lives; it would seem logical that such a dominant force in human interaction would foster such discourse. Amongst all the uncertainty in the nature of morality, however, there is but one certainty: morality is based entirely on perspective.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first two chapters of the textbook “A Practical Companion to Ethics” written by Anthony Weston the author places a strong amount of concentration on the relationship between ethics and religion. Weston wants the reader to understand that although religion has guided us into what we view as morally right it is not the end all decision. Ethics is a rather difficult topic as humankind is constantly evolving and changing, and people often develop rather strong opinions on what is considered to be “right”. It is always possible to be virtuous without religion, however not without set morals or rules. During the Module 1 selection of the book Weston provides lots of clear evidence as to why ethics should not and does not require a religious backing.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Faith And Diplomacy

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The beauty of “moral compass”, explored by Tenzin Gyatso, is that it does not depend on religious faith. The core values that operate as a foundation of moral compass are taught by our significant others since the first days of our life. They include such rules as: do not lie, do not harm, help others in need and etc. and serve as a foundation of ethical reasoning. Even though religious faith has the power to unite, it also has the power to divide.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “It is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue.” John Adams, who served as the second President of the United States and was a remarkable political philosopher, penned these words. Remarkably, John Adam’s words ring true today. However, morality is the issue and one point is sure: The United States Supreme Court should not arbitrate morality.…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Divine Command Theory

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A large demographic study by Pew Research Centre in 2010 found that 55% of the world 's population identified with one of the three Abrahamic religions, i.e. Judaism, Christianity, or Islam (Pew Research Center, 2012). The significance of these religions is due to the fact that they are the most popular monotheistic religions - religions who worship one god as the supreme creator or prime-mover. Among these 3.8 billion people there will of course be degrees of conviction with some believing that God is all that really matters, while others will lean more towards secular humanist views. Those that hold God above all else generally believe that God is their only guide to morality. In this essay I will discuss the main moral theories that deal…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions on Three Narratives 1. What is the difference between naysaying ethics and yeasaying ethics? Explain. What does this have to do with the story of the people of LeChambon? Naysaying ethics “forbids our doing certain harmful things”, even if that means to close the eyes to the reality and don’t do what people know it’s a right decision.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Living in a world filled with people of different cultures, religions, and personalities, it is impossible to think that with every situation that presents itself in American that mutual agreement upon it will be made. In the news, we constantly hear debates about gay-marriage, police brutality, racism, and many other incidents in America that bring out the inner activists of our people. Most debates over these controversies are no surprise to the public because they have been going on for years. One in particular is the debate about abortions. Since 1973, the world has been divided into two distinct groups of “Pro-life” and “Pro-choice” due to the landmark case of Roe v. Wade.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe that no society can establish an absolute set of moral truths because cultures are constantly changing and therefore the perceptions on moral situations of the culture will also always be changing. In order to…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Johnathan Haidt is a Professor of Ethical Leadership and social psychologist at NYU’s Stern School of Business. He wrote the book, The Righteous Mind to “at least do what we can to understand why we are so easily divided into hostile groups, each one certain of its righteousness.” He states: “My goal in this book is to drain some of the heat, anger, and divisiveness out of these topics and replace them with awe, wonder, and curiosity.” In light of America’s increasingly unreasonable political polarity and developing shared mistrust, it is obvious that Haidt has a lot of work on his hands.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Review of The Righteous Mind The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion by Jonathan Haidt strives to offer evidence for why people take different viewpoints on politics and religion. In a more broad sense, he looks at morality itself. By closely examining human behavior, Haidt provides the reader with self-gathered evidence to defend his reasoning behind the formation of morality.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Political Cleavages

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Political Cleavages Background Political cleavage and the idea of conflicts as an integral element in the creation and sustenance of political systems was first formulated by Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan in 1967. They stress on the idea of historical conflicts as the primary reason for the manner in which political parties emerge and create their voter base. This is relatively true, as seen in the political, social, economic and religious agenda which informs party organization and doctrine and the impact of political cleavages on political participation and electoral volatility is significant. Cleavages, in the political context can be understood as political divisions which comprise three elements, “(1) a social structural element, such as class, religious denominations, status or education, (2) an element of collective identity of this social group, and (3) an organizational manifestation in the form of collective action or a durable organization of the social groups concerned.” (Bornschier 2009).…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political Divide Analysis

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just over 150 years ago, we ended a bitter conflict in the United States. Two political ideologies fought over what essentially amounted to differences in their governmental ideology. Today our nation is wrapped in the realm of attacks that use words to assault those who differ in opinion. American is currently in the midst of a political divide that challenges our democracy at its core. It seems our country has found itself looking at canyon-sized gap in our two most prominent political beliefs.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Functionalism In Abortion

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The issue of abortion in America remains sharply divided. Not only is there a divide among the Democratic and Republican parties, but between the ages in generations. “62% of Americans ages 18 to 29 say that abortion is ‘not that important,’ while 53% of adults overall say this” (Lipka, 2014). “Abortion is often thought of as a…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics have a place in every society in the world; one will find a system of what is considered morally right and wrong regardless of the location or culture being observed. What does depend on location and culture is the nature of each ethical system. The way in which a society or culture views the world shapes its ethical system and determines which aspects of that system are emphasized. Examining the major ethical systems of the Eastern and Western world, Confucian and Christian ethics respectively, displays this idea. Despite the surprising similarity in the basic concepts of these two systems, the finer details show striking differences in what each one emphasizes.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics