Argumentative Essay: The Right To Die Movement

Superior Essays
“If you don 't have liberty and self-determination, you got nothing. That 's what this country 's built on and this is the ultimate self-determination to determine when and how you 're gonna die when you 're suffering”- Jack Kevorkian (“People”). Jack Kevorkian, or infamously known as Dr. Death, was a practicing physician and convicted murderer whom brought a spotlight to the nationwide conversation on the right to die movement (“Prescription”). But, what is the right to die movement? The right to die movement is an advocacy movement that stresses the belief in the natural or constitutional right to end one’s life when they seem fit, especially in the case of a terminal illness. However, with every movement there are citizens on both sides of the agreement. In this ever-progressing society, the ability of medicine has …show more content…
As the case with this paper, I, the writer has a bias when it comes to the right to die movement. I was born and raised Christian, specifically Lutheran. I believe we were a little bit more at ease with some subjects, but there is a slight shame placed upon suicide. However, as I have grown and seen the world for what it is, I have some differing stances. The church preaches ‘thou shall not kill’, which implies the obvious rejection of murder, but it is also applied to suicide. So, when someone kills themselves it is considered an act against God. However, I see fault with this since when someone is killing for a ‘good’ reason (i.e. a police officer or military personnel) they are praised. I also see fault when it is preached to have compassion for all who are suffering, yet when there is a way for someone to die at peace and with dignity it is considered taboo. So, I may believe in God and Jesus, but I believe the right to die movement is a legitimate cause that should be heard. If I was in any of the advocates situations I would want to be able to die before the illness has taken control of my

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this essay is for the Writer to examine and analyze methodology and legalities of ending one’s life options and ethical foundations surrounding the right to life targeting the following areas of concerns: 1) Physician Assisted- Suicide; and 2) Pro-life Proponent arguments. Background This writer understands the complexities of life as how many differences exist regarding physician- assisted suicide (PAS) as a state of suicide and pro–life choices that can be deemed by some as ethical suffering. Today, End of Life (EOL) does not have to be considered suicide or a war against pro-life when making competent choices such as advance directives, transitional services and or resources that could ease anxiety in decision-making choices…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The whole notion of pain, and how every individual experiences pain, is up for debate. We don 't know how another person experiences pain - physical pain or psychic pain. Some of these clinics where assisted suicide or euthanasia is practiced, they call it 'weariness of life. '” (Toews). For many years, those dubbed with the burden of cancer and other terminal illnesses have to suffer through a slow and painful death in the end.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United State of America is known as the land of the free. Citizens have freedom of speech and freedom of the press along with many other rights, but do Americans have the right to die? The Cable News Network, also known as CNN, has followed the story of a terminally ill woman who fought for the right to die on her own terms. The article, “Brittany Maynard, Advocate for 'Death with Dignity, ' Dies” by Catherine E. Shoichet, summarizes the controversial and complicated subject of controlling your own death in the case of terminal illness. Published on November 1, 2014, the recent article helped spread the issue throughout social media leaving many people to question if we deserve to die with dignity.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Life is sacred. Helping to end it is morally unacceptable (Cons-Arguments Against, About).” According to those against physician-assisted suicide, the idea of a physician aiding in the death of a patient is completely against the Hippocratic Oath (Cons-Arguments Against, About). Furthermore, allowing patients to choose their own death may lead to the abuse of the system, and in turn, would legalize murder (Cons-Arguments Against, About). Those against physician-assisted suicide also claim that choosing to take a person’s life degrades “the value of human life (Cons-Arguments Against, About).”…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Some doctors automatically object for religious reasons” (Humphry 174). Even though some religions do object, there is no reason to restrict everyone else’s access to this humane treatment option. The religious groups would not have to participate if physician assisted suicide became legal in all fifty states. “Lord Carey previously opposed assisted suicide but stated his reversal was not ‘anti-Christian’, reasoning that ‘in strictly observing the sanctity of life, the Church could now actually be promoting anguish and pain, the very opposite of a Christian message of hope’” (“Assisted Suicide Split”).…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Opponents say that difficult decisions are supposed to be made, by one’s self, family, and a physician, about a life that is at an end and should be allowed to be let go. It is not for the government to decide when the plug should be pulled or for a death pill to be administered. While opponents argue medically assisted suicide is unethical and will lead society down a slippery slope, proponents argue that it is ethically permissible, and is “the ultimate civil right” and not to let mentally competent, terminally ill patients who want to end their pain and suffering in a peaceful manner, is disrespectful to their right to personal autonomy. But the more modern day medicine and technology continue to pull people from the brink of death, more and more people will be asking for the right to end their lives, because extending the length of life, allows time for more people to become terminally ill and be in pain. Virtually all people want their loved ones to remember them as they once were, not what they could become in the years following the diagnosis of a terminally illness.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Derek Humphry and others in the Euthanasia Research and Guidance Organization, “every competent adult has the incontestable right to humankind’s ultimate civil and personal liberty -- the right to die in a manner and at a time of their own choosing” (Humphry). Congress declared through the court cases of Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill that “there was nothing to prevent the states from allowing both assisted suicide and physician participation in assisted suicide, so long as Congress does not preempt their authority by passing a law banning physician- assisted suicide nationally” (Richards). Furthermore, the right to privacy, procreation, family, and the refusal of medical treatment all support the liberty interest in doctor assisted dying and the choice of a hastened death. The life value of a person is for that individual to decide upon and should not be influenced by the government. People should do with their bodies what they see fit.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A man who started stimulated this “right to die” movement in America was Derek Humphrey. In 1980, Humphrey, formed the “Hemlock Society” in order to…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On November 1st 2014, Brittany Maynard laid in bed surrounded by loved ones. She had chosen this day to drink the fatal dose of medication she was prescribed. She no longer wanted to suffer from head and neck pains, surgeries, seizures, and stroke like symptoms she endured from her terminal brain cancer. She had to leave her home state and make a whole new life in Oregon months prior. She states,” I had to find new physicians, establish residency in Portland, search for a new home, obtain a new driver 's license, change my voter registration and enlist people to take care of our animals, and my husband, Dan, had to take a leave of absence from his job.”…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The California legislature passed a bill that will make it legal for doctors to prescribe suicide medicines for terminally ill patients. The state Assembly approved the bill with a 42-33 votes, while senate passed it with 23-14. The End of Life Option Act now goes to Gov. Jerry Brown, who is a former Jesuit seminarian.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes when life and suffering become unbearable, death offers a welcome escape. When it is a question between seeking expensive long term treatment or ending one’s suffering altogether, assisted suicide, Death with Dignity, gives someone a choice whether or not to end their life. Death with Dignity refers to a person’s legal right to end one’s life. This “solution” to pain and suffering is often frowned upon for various reasons in many religions and by specific individuals such as doctors, nurses, and family members. Despite these objections, death with dignity should be legal throughout the United States because it gives people a chance to decide what is best for themselves, it costs a lot less money than a long-term treatment, and it ends their suffering.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Though many are working against the Death with Dignity acts and what they stand for, I argue that religion and morality play no part in someone else 's decision to receive aid in ending their life, and I continue to agree with those who are working hard to legalize physicians assisted suicide in…

    • 1306 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Caleb Barwick 11 August 2017 Death Equals Peace Should murderers, rapists, and terrorists be let back in society after serving time in jail just to repeat the crimes they already committed? Well, with the death penalty this will not be a problem. With the death penalty that is not possible for that to happen. The death penalty is necessary for punishment because it can help cut down on terrorism, Americans prefer it as punishment, and it is needed for serious crimes.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics