The rich or wealthy as most like to call them seem to be ideal to people, but don 't we all wonder how they do it. Money is something the wealthy have, so what society wants to know is how they are more privilege and how they have the tools to get where they want to be. The rich are seeking new opportunities for more wealth, so they are continuing to educate themselves and they are taking the risks to get there.
Inequality ( an important role when It comes down to the state of being unequal; absence of uniformity; difference imbalance of size.) plays an important role with society and the wealthy. The rich had more control of their money than the poor did so they are able to increase their percentage income. Danny Dorling implies that “Between 1979 and 2007 incomes of the wealthiest , 1% of the household in the US went up 25%, an increment (an increase or addition, especially one of a series on a fixed scale) of only 18 every penny for the poorest 20 every penny.” Facts show that not only from my given information that I’ve obtained the information is given to us by the US Congressional …show more content…
Steven Cunningham argues that "At the point when the vast majority think about the rich, they presumably are considering individuals with extraordinary riches. When they think about poor people, they likely are considering individuals with low earnings". Society has showed us that the richer are taking from us and keeping for themselves, but what we don 't notice is that we are letting them take advantage of this without knowing. (Steven
Inequality ( an important role when It comes down to the state of being unequal; absence of uniformity; difference imbalance of size.) plays an important role with society and the wealthy. The rich had more control of their money than the poor did so they are able to increase their percentage income. Danny Dorling implies that “Between 1979 and 2007 incomes of the wealthiest , 1% of the household in the US went up 25%, an increment (an increase or addition, especially one of a series on a fixed scale) of only 18 every penny for the poorest 20 every penny.” Facts show that not only from my given information that I’ve obtained the information is given to us by the US Congressional …show more content…
Steven Cunningham argues that "At the point when the vast majority think about the rich, they presumably are considering individuals with extraordinary riches. When they think about poor people, they likely are considering individuals with low earnings". Society has showed us that the richer are taking from us and keeping for themselves, but what we don 't notice is that we are letting them take advantage of this without knowing. (Steven