Against Capital Punishment Summary

Superior Essays
Issues concerning the death penalty have been wrestled with in court as early as 1967. The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the ending of the lives of those thought to be guilty of a crime, mostly murder. The methods used include: lethal injections, electrocution, lethal gas, firing squad, and hanging. Only thirty-two states practice the death penalty. Ernest van den Haag, author of “The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense,” argues for the use of the death penalty. On the other hand, Jack Greenberg, gives reasons opposing the death penalty in his work “Against the American System of Capital Punishment.” There are theories as to why the death penalty is necessary; however, these theories cause controversy. By the deterrence theory, the death …show more content…
The death penalty just makes a moral point by being an example of a severe punishment for a severe crime. Retribution uses government power. In her writing, “Against Retributive Justifications of the Death Penalty,” Sarah Roberts-Cady shares “the appeal to retributive justice is often called a ‘backward look-ing’” (Roberts-Cady 185). Retributive justice is a response to past actions. While it is simple to recognize who deserves punishment, the retribution theory fails to describe what they deserve. Roberts-Cady explains of how others perceive the retribution theory: as an unfair advantage to those who actually followed the rules; these people are fair play theorists. Some retributive theo-rists would agree with “an eye-for-an-eye,” which means that the punishment should be equiva-lent to the crime. If a person kills someone else, he ought to be killed. However, it is impossible to inflict the same exact harm; for example, Hitler committed genocide against millions, but it would not be the same punishment by just killing him. This “law of retaliation” (Roberts-Cady 186) would not work because that would mean that committing an equally horrid crime is moral-ly acceptable, such as: rape. There is no general rule for determining equivalence in punishment and crime. A price tag cannot just be put on a life; therefore, one human’s worth cannot be com-pared to that of another. Roberts-Cady establishes that a crime …show more content…
In the surveys to the general public, when given the alternative of life imprisonment without parole as opposed to the death penalty, the approval rate for the death penalty dropped. The death penalty should be abolished due to its inability to carry out one of its purposes of preventing other crime from oc-curring. In a perfect world, the death penalty would not ensue any racial or geographical bias, and there would be an even-handedness or general way of carrying out this punishment. Howev-er, this nation’s method fails to distribute it equally. The value of a human’s life cannot be meas-ure; consequently, the life’s worth cannot be equated with that of another’s life. If a moratorium is needed to contemplate of ways to better the death penalty to where it could actually stop crime, then so be it. This system of punishment cannot endure if it is not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty The Death penalty is a highly controversial topic in present day politics. The public is concerned with how America’s most dangerous criminals are held responsible for their crimes as well as how they will be kept from harming others. It’s reasonable to want a mass murderer to be punished in a manner that removes further threat, but is it our place to decide if his or her life should be ended? In other words, is it moral for society to prescribe murder as retribution for murder?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The key features of the argument on supporting the death penalty developed by Ernest Van Den Haag first focuses on matters of mal-distribution and determining if an individual really deserves it, second the miscarriages of justice, third if the death penalty is a better deterrence than other punishments, fourth the incidental issues that the death penalty promotes, and fifth justice, excess, and degradation. The first argument that Ernest Van Den Haag argues is on the matter of mal-distribution, and determining whether an individual really deserves capital punishment. He expresses his view that mal-distribution being compared between those individuals who are guilty or innocent is undeserved. The acts of capital punishment upon an individual who knowingly commits a crime and is considered guilty in that sense deserves the punishment. However, on the other hand he considers that when mal-distribution is then put upon an innocent life that did not commit the crime but is considered guilty is seen as than unjust.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What do you think of when you hear “death sentence”? Probably someone being injected with lethal fluids and toxins with a sole purpose of immediate death. Another idea that might come to mind would be the classic electric chair. Somebody sitting there expressionless, waiting for the electric bolts to pulse through their body leading to a painful death. Maybe also a gas chamber, or hanging that was used in movies that take place many years ago.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The retribution theory is looked at like a form of vengeance or revenge. So if someone commits a crime heinous enough the only punishment fitting would be death, “A person who makes s conscious choice to upset the balance of society should be punished” (“Punishment-Theories of Punishment” 10). That seems to make sense in theory to some but there are many who don’t agree. Aberon Waugh stated, “The main objection to killing people as a punishment…is that killing people is wrong” (“The Facts: 13 Reas to Opp the Death…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If death penalty is a way that the offender pay for the crime of murder, how did killing another man is right? The death penalty is somehow legalized murdering. In the end, there is no right in search for revenge even though it is under the law authorization. After all, murder is wrong and that apply to everyone. The overuse of death penalty makes people believe that takeaway someone’s life is right thing to do.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrianne Haslet-Davis writes such a vivid recognition of enforcing the death penalty by the use of deterrence. She focuses on an individual story, hers being coming close to death. She goes on and on about if any individuals was murdered the life of the murderer should be also. The community tends to always use punishments to put down criminals from their cruel and heinous actions. However, with our crime rates so high, it's plain up simple that the smartest punishment for any murderer should be execution.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been a solution to crimes constantly. Justice systems around the world have chosen to take the life of a criminal instead of sentencing them to life in prison. Capital punishment should be abolished because the justice system should not have the authority to take a criminal’s life. According to capital punishment laws, it is not justified for a criminal to take a life, but it is acceptable for a member of the justice system to take that criminal’s life.…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I have presented both an argument in favor of the death penalty and against the death penalty. To start with there is a brief history of capital punishment including some important legal cases. Many arguments can be made as to the morality of execution, below I describe the deterrent effects as well as a common view held by Immanuel Kant in support of capital punishment. Both of these views are shared by many people. In opposition to capital punishment I have considered the fundamental view that killing, even a murderer, is wrong and the morality of charging juries with understanding the laws that govern sentencing.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Death Penalty: The Price Society Pays The death penalty has been a topic of controversy for centuries, known for its inhumane brutality methods which have evolved over the years from lynching to gassing, electrocuting and now the lethal injection; it is in fact the sentencing of those who have committed a heinous crime. On the other hand, justice has been served when the death penalty has finally been executed on the prisoner, bringing a sense of retribution to those who have lost a loved one due to the crime committed. Although many people might think it is a working system, others land in the mixture of controversy for various reasons. Over the course of time, the death penalty has started to become obsolete and is slowly making a turnover…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The primary objective of retribution was, “not revenge but rather a return of the net balance of justice that has been upended through crime.” Capital Punishment was considered morally right because Americans believed in the eye for an eye concept. Proponents of the death penalty agree that it is an important tool to preserve law and order, to deter crime, and even to lessen the cost rather than life imprisonment. They claim that retribution is a way to show integrity to the victim, to help console-grieving families, and to ensure that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause any future tragedy. On the other hand,…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the twenty first century there has been a considerable amount of discussion debating whether or not the death penalty, the act of sentencing someone to death as punishment for a crime, should be re-introduced into Australia’s modern society. In these disputes people attempt to argue that the death penalty should be brought back as it is a deterrent against crime, however evidence proves that the death penalty should not be reintroduced into Australias society as it is cruel and inhumane Such evidence is outlined in the history of the death penalty, in the rise of executions of our neighbouring countries which still up hold the death penalty and even in the many cases where people have had the human rights violated and have been falsely accused…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Criminal Justice system is only one aspect of a major entity referred to as social institution. Social institutions were created to protect and teach acceptable behaviors to society members to ensure unified treatment of everyone in a specified group. The Criminal Justice system was designed as a means to discipline and correct offenders, offer compensation to victims of criminal acts, and deter future criminal occurrences. Even with all the focus of this system geared at rehabilitation there are still a numbers of offenders that both the criminal justice system and social institution have failed to reach. For some of these criminals, they will meet their fate with a sanction that been used since society 's infancy and is surrounded with controversy: Capital Punishment.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing Death Penalty

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Abolishing the Death Penalty has been an enormous argument in our society. The main question that everyone debates about all throughout the world, is whether the penalty should be abolished or not. To me honestly, of course the Death Penalty should be banned from all states. I do not support it by any means, mainly because it goes against my religious beliefs. It’s not only cruel, but it also violates our human rights and is more expensive than people may think.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics