The resolve for the Bioethics’ category is “Is it ok for doctor to help in assisted suicide?” The affirmative team presented by Dan Simmons and Danielle Eustace. The negative team presented by Andon Ware and Austin Railey III. The affirmative team and negative team both did a pretty great job on the topic beside a little controversial comment during the question and answers. However, their research were both valid and support their resolve well. I believe the affirmative team won this debate. I believed the affirmative team got the win for this debate because they were point out some strong elements. At the beginning of the speech portion, Danielle stated out key elements such as people fear the unknown, dignity, and terminal illness. Those
…show more content…
Follow up Dan’s speech, Danielle finished up the speech portion with a strong example about the 29 years old women got brain cancer and how all the treatment just made her condition worsen. The example was a key to support the terminal illness, when a person got this kind of condition, they know they are not going to be the same and they choose to end their pain and to help the people around them to move on. Although, the speech portion was strong for the affirmative team, but the question and answer did not go to well for them. Instead of asking the question related to the topic, the affirmative team went personal and asking question that directly attack the member of the negative team, which costed the team the quality of questions. The affirmative team was making personal statement like how negative team did not have clear fact, or did not do their research probably. However, their closing rebuttal saved them. Danielle used her own experience in nursing school to present to us the environment that not all of us can see and feel every
Follow up Dan’s speech, Danielle finished up the speech portion with a strong example about the 29 years old women got brain cancer and how all the treatment just made her condition worsen. The example was a key to support the terminal illness, when a person got this kind of condition, they know they are not going to be the same and they choose to end their pain and to help the people around them to move on. Although, the speech portion was strong for the affirmative team, but the question and answer did not go to well for them. Instead of asking the question related to the topic, the affirmative team went personal and asking question that directly attack the member of the negative team, which costed the team the quality of questions. The affirmative team was making personal statement like how negative team did not have clear fact, or did not do their research probably. However, their closing rebuttal saved them. Danielle used her own experience in nursing school to present to us the environment that not all of us can see and feel every