The Relationship Of Ancient Near Eastern History With The Biblical Record

1205 Words Jan 19th, 2016 5 Pages
MRS 101: The relationship of Ancient Near Eastern history with the biblical record
Just as knowing something about the 18th century Enlightenment, Colonial American history, as well as the people who attended the Constitutional Convention will tell your historical knowledge of the U.S. Constitution, knowing something about ancient Near Eastern history and culture will deepen your historical comprehension of the files that compose the Hebrew Bible. (Wright, 1961)

Three simple discussions, on early Near Eastern scribalism, notions of deity, and covenants, exemplify how developing a deeper historical understanding is in seeing the way the Hebrew Bible is both similar to and different from several other records in the ancient Near East, the initial step. (Wright, 1961)
This is one of the most essential problems regarding the Hebrew Bible. “While some scribes wrote everyday documents such as letters and contracts, learned scribes regularly occupied themselves with significant problems, including cosmology, rituals, prayers, laws, and disclosures. Although they occasionally attributed their work to historical achievers these scribes infrequently claimed authorship of their work.” (Lenzi, 2015)
Naturally, new texts were not just composed by scribes; old ones were additionally replicated by them. We realize from several variations of a writing that when old texts were duplicated by scribes, liberties were taken by them. They delete something unwanted could add new content, or…

Related Documents