Three Elements Of Crime

Decent Essays
Elements of crime
A crime can be divided into different elements, i.e. different parts of crime. These elements must be proven to prove a crime. A crime generally has three elements, first is a criminal act, also called an actus reus; second is a criminal intent, also termed as mens rea; the third is a concurrence of the first and the second. According to United States law, elements of crime is a set of data points that proves a crime. A court declares one as guilty only when the prosecution presents the evidence which are beyond any doubts. The basic components of a crime are mental state, conduct, concurrence, and causation (Samaha, 2013).
Mental State
Mental State refers to mental elements of the defendant. This is a necessary element as
…show more content…
If an individual helps a person to commit a crime, he can also be punished as the offender. A person can be a part of a crime in different types. Some of them are aid, counsel, and procure. One can aid an offender at the time of the offense or prior to that as well. The offender need not to know about the aid provided to him, this means that it is possible that there is no communication between two parties. Counsel means the secondary party have given ideas or advised the offender on how to commit the crime. Procure means getting something done by others just like a contract killing means you have hired someone to commit the crime (Allen, …show more content…
Defenses particularly negate the intent element. Defenses can provide partial or total refuge from punishment.
Mental Disorder: Mental disorder or insanity is stated as the lack of understanding the illegitimate of the crime. It can neutralize the intent of a crime, this means that it is helpful only in the crimes that are having an intent element. If it is proven that the offender is suffering from insanity, then he might be sent to a mental hospital for treatment.
Mistake of Fact: In some jurisdiction "I made a mistake" is a defense only if the mistake is genuine. This defense is generally used in conjunction with other defense.
Necessity/Lesser Harm: A crime is justifiable if it prevented greater harm than the harm created by the crime. It can be explained as a person charged for trespassing, but he was actually trying to put out a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bernie Character Analysis

    • 1569 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The film, Bernie, is about a single, middle aged, Christian, white man named Bernie Tiede who has an occupation as a mortician. Bernie is beloved by everyone in his small town of Carthage, Texas. He is fantastic at his job, a great friend, generous, and an overall kind and caring person. It is believed by some people in the town that he might be gay because he has never had a girlfriend, and he is mostly very friendly to older women, but there is no confirmation about his sexual identity throughout the film. There is no background given on Bernie’s family or his upbringing.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furthermore, the causes of her behavior in committing seven murders had a lot to do with Social reaction theory. People have labelled Wuornos because of her crimes, which put a damaging perception on her self-image. This labeling on her relates to Interpreting Crime; people’s reactions and thoughts of her devastating crimes. For instance, many labeled her as a psychopath, murdered, serial killer, uneducated, poor, emotionally and physically corrupted. Interpreting crime, also helps label positive behavior from negative behavior.…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The term crime cannot be defined easily because it does not have one definition nor two; crime is a concept. Moreover, crime is based on a general notion of ideals formed by society, according to time and place (Friedman, 1993, 6). Society does not imply all individuals, the rich and powerful create the laws that compose certain acts as a crime and are then enforced by law enforcement (Friedman, 1993, 10). Thus, giving law enforcement control and power over all individuals. Their job is to protect and serve within their community.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity(NGRI) Intro The criminal justice system is utilized to punish those who violate the laws and to protect the rights of the people who abide by the laws. However, there are instances where the criminal act of an individual are not punished through imprisonment. In these instances they individual may have a mental illness, which is causing them to not understand the consequences of their actions.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For an individual to be blameworthy and criminally responsible for their actions, the accused person must have committed the actus reus and the mens rea. In the case of the accused pleading Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD), the court focuses on whether the accused had the mens rea while committing the alleged offence (Verdun-Jones, 2015). If the accused person did not know what he or she was doing was wrong, or did not appreciate the conduct or omission, the accused will not be found criminally responsible (Verdun-Jones, 2015). Overall, if the accused is found NCRMD, he or she will most likely be apprehended in the hospital, or supervised in the community to keep the citizens safe from a possible reoccurring…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Upon reflection of this entire course, coupled with a consideration of this writer’s own developing knowledge of clinical mental health counseling and art therapy, this writer feels it is imperative to recognize the humanness of every individual, regardless of his or her condition. Therefore, when this writer finds herself in a hypothetical debate with a friend who believes the insanity defense is just a clever way to get around the law, this writer would view this situation as the perfect opportunity to educate this friend and inform him or her about the details of this controversial issue. In regards to how the legal system of the United States handles crimes committed by individuals who suffer from mental illness, specifically schizophrenia as in the assumed case of Mr. Quincy, it is crucial to consider the important reason why the insanity defense exists, to whom it should apply, and what actually happens with this defense. Ultimately, the way in which a person who suffers from mental illness is treated by the legal system poses fundamental questions of how we,…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Combining the Past and a Plan The insanity plea is like trying to hold water in a fish net. Attempting to apply boundaries to something as intangible as the concept of insanity is bound to spark controversy. Challenging, yet necessary, the application of how laws should affect the mentally ill is an unavoidable issue that needs to be confronted head on.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity defense allows a defendant in a case to plead not guilty by reason of insanity. Law Digests says that “the Insanity Defense is probably the most controversial of all criminal defense strategies”. The definition of legal insanity is when a person has a "Disorder which impairs the human mind and prevents distinguishing between actions that are right or wrong" (Duhaime 1). The defendant then has to prove to the court that he did not understand what he was doing (Findlaw 1). Along with the insanity defense, some states allow them to plead innocent by reason of irresistible impulse which is another form of the insanity defense (Law Digest 1).…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mental Illness In Prison

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By definition, mental illness is “an affliction with a mental disease or mental condition which is manifested by a disorder or disturbance in behavior, feeling, thinking, or judgment to such an extent that the person afflicted requires care, treatment and rehabilitation” (Hall, Miraglia, Lee, 2011). This definition of mental illness provides a broad overview of what many individuals in our society are dealing with every day. Although it may be seen as a problem in mainstream society, it is often overlooked in prison. Upwards of 61 percent of prisoners who committed a violent offense suffer from mental illness (CITE).…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction “He who does not prevent a crime when he can, encourages it”, a quote from Lucius Annaeus Seneca that helps describe how society views and “prevents” crime. Criminal theories attempt to construct views on how to prevent and fight crime but often the criminal justice system is working against society. The two theories that are explained within are the social learning theory and rational choice theory. These theories will construct views as to how and why the seven crimes are committed using the concepts within the theories.…

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three primary theories in psychology which help to give meaning in defining what is identified as crime. Although the notion of defining crime is not a simple matter, these three theories shed light on the subject. The most straightforward answer to contextualising crime depends on factors or variables within a society. In today's society the most common meaning 'crime' has depends on three views. The Consensus View, The Conflict View, and The Interactionist View.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction My argument is that the law of intention is clear, simple, and still fit for purpose. Intention is one of the categories falling under the mens rea of murder. The law uses intention as one of the main methods of classifying offences, such as deciding between murder or manslaughter. The presence or absence of intention is what the law is interested in, not the motive behind the actions in question.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics