Consequently social power was defined as the capacity to influence and control others behaviors’. Galinsky, Gruenfeld, & Magee (2003) noted the perceived social power have affects individuals actions in various ways. They acknowledged that studies have showed that those perceived power experience show more positive effects, become more extraverted, and expresses more heightened awareness towards rewards and strategies of acquiring rewards, have decreases awareness to threat, are less able to regulate behavior pertaining to social norms, and show wide range of behaviors. It was noted that perceived power allows individuals to increasingly expresses underlying personalities and feelings than those with less perceived power. Galinsky, Gruenfeld, & Magee (2003) noted that studies have shown that the effects of perceived power are contradictory, while some note that power have positive affects other show perceived power have negative effects. They noted of a study that showed those with most power (individuals with supreme justice and chief justice) tend to have narrow thinking about policy option than those with less power. They explained that those with less power tend to have think through the pros and cons and overall tend to have more doubt and are less likely to act. On the other hand power provides individuals the mechanisms to reduce deliberations, increase heuristic thinking and enhance motivation for taking
Consequently social power was defined as the capacity to influence and control others behaviors’. Galinsky, Gruenfeld, & Magee (2003) noted the perceived social power have affects individuals actions in various ways. They acknowledged that studies have showed that those perceived power experience show more positive effects, become more extraverted, and expresses more heightened awareness towards rewards and strategies of acquiring rewards, have decreases awareness to threat, are less able to regulate behavior pertaining to social norms, and show wide range of behaviors. It was noted that perceived power allows individuals to increasingly expresses underlying personalities and feelings than those with less perceived power. Galinsky, Gruenfeld, & Magee (2003) noted that studies have shown that the effects of perceived power are contradictory, while some note that power have positive affects other show perceived power have negative effects. They noted of a study that showed those with most power (individuals with supreme justice and chief justice) tend to have narrow thinking about policy option than those with less power. They explained that those with less power tend to have think through the pros and cons and overall tend to have more doubt and are less likely to act. On the other hand power provides individuals the mechanisms to reduce deliberations, increase heuristic thinking and enhance motivation for taking