The Rule Of Augustus In Roma Goodman's The Roman Republic

Superior Essays
After years of civil war a young Octavian, finally restored order and stability on an exhausted Roman state. After his victory over Actium in 31 BC, Octavian found himself in control of the Roman Empire. The answer came in the first meeting of the senate when Octavian theatrically relinquished all his powers to the Roman Senate. In exchange for these powers Octavian received a new name, Augustus. In Discourses (III. Xiii. 9) Epictetus tells us, "For you see that Caesar appears to furnish us with great peace. There are no more enemies, nor battles, robbers, or pirates, but we can travel at every hour and sail from the rising sun to the setting." This is the beginning of the era known to historians as Pax Romana or Roman Peace. This period of …show more content…
To protect his person, he created his own personal army (Goodman, p. 38), and that the ever-growing empire, paranoia, and expanded army took a toll on the royal treasury. To compensate, Augustus must impose new taxes on overburdened citizen 's (Goodman, p. 40). This certainly caused dissension among the Roman common folk, especially those of lower class. Goodman confirms that historians are delving into the rule of Augustus with renewed focus, and instead of peace, finding the times filled with crisis after crisis. It is my intention to unravel the threads of this time and that of Augustus deeds revealing the emperor’s true motives behind his rule and veiled mannerisms with which he governed. Augustus claimed to have restored the Republican government as it had existed before the civil wars erupted with Julius Caesar crossing the Rubicon. In retrospect, it appears that Augustus provided the foundations for the establishment of a new type of government, the absolute rule by a single individual. In other words, a monarchy and what they say of history is true. It is indeed written by the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Republic was built on the traditional policy of compromise, devoted to ensure the welfare of the people. In time, the struggle for authority brought fundamental changes to the traditional sentiments of the Republic. As territory expansions brought great wealth into the country, power hungry senators and government officials harbored political ambitions and competed for power. Political treachery and self-interest within the senate and the assemblies gave way to economic turmoil and social unrest. The fight for control under the existing Republic ultimately demanded a conversion toward Empire, but before the transition could take place Rome would have to go through a series of civil war, mob violence and murder.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 31 BCE Octavian, a relative of Julius Caesar, defeated his rival Marc Antony and consolidated his rule over the empire. Octavian, also known as Augustus, kept the empire centralized and created a basis for many years…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tacitus Analytical Essay

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It starts off with the introduction of Augustus, how his rule was unchallenged. Tacitus questions Augustus’s rule through the actions portrayed, “Indeed, he attracted everybody’s goodwill by the enjoyable gift of peace. Then he gradually pushed ahead and absorbed the functions of the senate, the officials, and even the law” (page 32). There is an admiration for the old senatorial system where censors and the senate itself could influence the decision of the ruler. Augustus’s actions proved to cause corruption as the government became engulfed with violence and bribery, leading to uncertainty amongst people.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After his victory, Caesar established himself as dictator for life.[28] His assassination led to a second Triumvirate among Octavian (Caesar's grandnephew and heir), Mark Antony and Lepidus, and to another civil war between Octavian and Antony.[29] The former in 27 BC became princeps civitatis and got the title of Augustus, founding the principate, a diarchy between the princeps and the senate.[29] Rome was established as a de facto empire, which reached its greatest expansion in the second century under the Emperor Trajan, Rome was confirmed as caput Mundi, i.e. the capital of the world, an expression which had already been given in the Republican period. During its first two centuries, the empire saw as rulers, emperors of the Julio-Claudian,[30] Flavian (who also built eponymous amphitheater, known as the Colosseum)[30] and Antonine dynasties.[31]…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is Augustus Important

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During Augustus's reign he also remade a new forum as well as police and fire departments. Augustus 'led Rome's transformation from republic to empire during the tumultuous years following the assassination of his great-uncle…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF AUGUSTUS CAESAR. This biographical sketch primarily looks at the life of Augustus Caesar from his birth to his death. Looking at achievements he made as an emperor of Ancient Rome and how he acquired power. In this paper we will discuss the immense impact Augustus had in shaping western civilization through his reign of the Roman Empire that endured for centuries after his death, “the first two of which were the centuries of the celebrated Pax Romana, the longest period of peace the Western world would ever enjoy” (Casson, 1999).…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “ Neither the Han nor the Roman empire emerged through a sudden, unexpected revolution”. The Han empire was controlled by Shi Huangdi was a chinese monarch who was awed by his advisors by the scale of his success. while there was also the great empire of Rome that was controlled by Octavian who later went under the new name Augustus who like Shi Huangdi became a monarch both had multiple achievements while rule their empires and both used this titles and justified their actions because of their political power showing “How the builders of the Han and Roman empires conceived and justified their political authority Starting with the Han empire source 1 of the packet titled “ From Sima Qian” which is a biography that describes Qin Shi Huangdi…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to Rome’s historical, deep-seated hatred of one-man rule, it was imperative that Augustus did not give the impression that he was establishing a monarchy. It is likely that Augustus would have learned from Julius Caesar’s mistakes– his adoptive father– and realized how dangerous it was to exhibit brazen displays of tyrannical authority. To prevent the Roman people from viewing him as a dictator, or even worse, a rex, Augustus capitalized on Republican terminology and rhetoric to counterbalance the astonishingly un-Republican nature of his regime. By describing the history of his leadership with traditional Republican idioms, Augustus was able to satisfy the people by assuring them of the continuity of a classic Republican framework, “even though important elements of this discourse had been rendered null and void by the time the Res Gestae was published” (Hodgson 263). In the sixth paragraph of the document Augustus claims, “The Senate and the Roman people agreed that I should be appointed sole guardian of laws and morals with supreme power, but I refused any office offered to me that was contrary to the customs of our ancestors” (Mellor 256).…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “The Fall of Rome — an author discussion,” authors Bryan Ward-Perkins and Peter Heather present and confer their stances related to the fall of Rome. Though the two historians disagreed on a few concepts, they both definitely agreed that the fall of Rome was caused by a violent struggle through several “series of unfortunate events.” Contrary to other historians, like Walter Goffart, Ward-Perkins and Heather agreed that each time the Romans ceded land to foreign adversaries, their internal state of affairs were disrupted. For 70 years, Heather states, the Romans “struggled to survive” amid their “loss of vital, agricultural, tax base,” and their difficulty to maintain their military manpower. For example, Alexander Severus, who was Emperor from 222-235, was murdered by his own troops when he refused to increase their pay.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this part the author focuses on the neighboring cities to Rome. He refers to these as a “more traditional and convenient target (p.191)”. Using other articles and books as his sources, he proves his point that the outsiders to the Roman Empire were potentially the most dangerous enemy it ever had. Also by continuing chronologically through time he demonstrates examples of outsiders being a violent disturbance to the Roman Order.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first chapter of William V. Harris’s book, War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, the author makes use of primary sources, such as Polybius, and archeological evidence to analyze Roman attitudes towards war. Since warfare was an integral part of life for the Roman Empire, Harris attempts to provide the reasoning behind their desire to continuously engage in battle. Specifically, in the first half of chapter one entitled, “Roman Attitudes Towards War”, Harris looks at the aristocracy and their general feelings towards war. Overall, Harris claims there were multiple political and social reasons that Romans engaged in war. Specifically, Harris analyzes that with regards to the aristocracy, war gave them opportunities to further their political…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The emperors control of the Senate, military superiority, generosity, and domestication of the economy contributed to their popularity and success as rulers. Augustus took control and united the Roman Republic by defeating the last opposing power, Marc…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Livius’s account of history will always be scrutinized in depth on how accurate his work was. Often, historians are biased in their research and methodology often trying to point out flaws in other researchers. Titus Livius had to refer back to earlier Roman historians to ensure that his history would be accurate as possible. He does a remarkable job in this book of telling the reader what Roman history did in the ancient…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late Roman Republic, the external expansion of early Rome was a surprise to many. The era of the great expansion of Roman power and civilization is the era of the Roman Republic, in which its Senate ruled Rome and its assembly, which were establishments, formed at the beginning of the monarchy. The Republic had a history of many conflicts, aiding the Republic in becoming so powerful, thus making Rome become unstoppable. But as we all know from the conflicts that aroused in the past with many other large city-states and Empire’s, with incredible power comes many dilemmas.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Augustus demonstrated to be a man who is great and mighty enough to control the mob, Senate, and Legions. The men of power like Gaius Julius Caesar and Octavianus August rose beyond all the great Romans in the political opponents, reform a corrupt government and to have the system remain stabilized in confusion. The Fall of the Republic was…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays