The principal interrupted the slow school day abruptly by her voice beaming through the halls. “All of the class of 2016, please report to the gymnasium NOW!!!” I started rambling with my classmates about the tone of her voice and why we were wanted in the gym. “Excuse me!”, I said as I pushed through the crowd. We sat in the bleachers occasionally glancing at our phones while Mrs. Jones stated, “I am glad to have seen this class improve throughout the years! I want to show you my gratitude by presenting a gift to all of you. Thomas County Central High School hasn’t accomplished this goal since the early 1980’s. The Senior Class of 2016 will have a class portrait!!” We applauded as the photographer was ushered in. Right after the perfect picture was taken Mrs.
…show more content…
Hillary Clinton on the economy, I analyzed the article based on the way the information was organized. I had several questions and concerns while reading. Why didn’t the article state how Trump would go about abolishing estate taxes? He doesn’t have a precise answer. Not giving that information provides lack of facts to back the claim. Why weren’t there any people in the article providing credibility? After all, this is his first Rodeo. For Clinton’s ideas on estate taxes, it was hard to follow because of the complicated wording. Could the author break down her plans on a more understandable level? Having her camp talk about the plan would have been helpful. Why is the information listed with bullets instead of organized in paragraphs? I think paragraphs would be easier to follow, if went from Trump’s to Hillary’s ideas. The article lacked logos when needed, which is what the people are interested in. We need details to support the short claims in the article! Of course, I wanted ethos, too but the article only stated claims instead of letting the experts pull on our morals.
Hillary Clinton on the economy, I analyzed the article based on the way the information was organized. I had several questions and concerns while reading. Why didn’t the article state how Trump would go about abolishing estate taxes? He doesn’t have a precise answer. Not giving that information provides lack of facts to back the claim. Why weren’t there any people in the article providing credibility? After all, this is his first Rodeo. For Clinton’s ideas on estate taxes, it was hard to follow because of the complicated wording. Could the author break down her plans on a more understandable level? Having her camp talk about the plan would have been helpful. Why is the information listed with bullets instead of organized in paragraphs? I think paragraphs would be easier to follow, if went from Trump’s to Hillary’s ideas. The article lacked logos when needed, which is what the people are interested in. We need details to support the short claims in the article! Of course, I wanted ethos, too but the article only stated claims instead of letting the experts pull on our morals.