The Final Judgment Analysis

Improved Essays
Caroline Masters has a shot at being a judge for the U.S. Federal Court but her niece needs her right after she gets the call. In The Final Judgment, Caroline starts the trial while revealing her past and how it relates to the trial. She struggles through the family drama and people having doubts about her. In this journal, I will be questioning, clarifying, and evaluating.

I will be questioning why Caroline broke into Megan Race’s home and took her journal. Caroline breaks into a witness’ home and needs to look for evidence that she is an unreliable witness and a liar. Caroline thinks that Megan killed James out of revenge and is framing Brett. Caroline had suspected something was up with Megan and couldn’t pinpoint what. She hired a private
…show more content…
The police first suspected Brett because she had James’s wallet and a bloody knife when they found her. Brett said she didn’t kill him, she was swimming at the time of the murder. Caroline then suspected Megan Race, an ex-girlfriend but learned that was not the case, but she had an affair with her brother-in-law. She had gone to the killing site, which was owned by her family and bequathed. She and her father, Channing, walked through the process. Caroline’s father was an ex-cop. She retains some information when she looks back on her past. She remembered an ex-boyfriend, David, that she helped escape the law that her father had called him in because he was a fugitive and Channing didn’t think he was a good influence for his daughter, ”You decided to save her, just as you saved me” Caroline bitterly said(Patterson 412). Caroline connected the pieces on how he didn’t think James was a good influence for his granddaughter and how he made David disappear. He didn’t want the same thing that happened to Caroline to happen to Brett. Caroline went to confront Channing and he admitted to everything, in scrupulous detail. He walked her through everything, explaining that he called her to be Brett’s lawyer because she left her behind, Channing asked her,” Just where were you, Caroline when Brett was growing up? Following your own ambitions in California, ignoring your daughter and family. You …show more content…
James was murdered while Brett was swimming, and Brett finds him. She pulls the knife out of his chest and somehow ends up with his wallet. She gets scared and runs from the scene of the crime. A police officer finds her and does not read her her Miranda rights. She is arrested on a DUI and brought to the jail. She is brought to the hospital and evidence is taken from her body. She is then questioned in a holding cell and her Miranda rights are read to her then. Caroline is called in then and plans to have all the evidence thrown out from Brett’s questioning before her Miranda rights are read to her but Brett wants her story heard because she had nothing to do with killing James. Caroline finds a lead that leads her to Megan Race but that turned out to be a dead end. She is fighting hard in court but everyone thinks Brett killed James. Caroline remembered her past and how her father, Channing, thought some boy wasn’t good enough for her and called him in, as he was a fugitive. Caroline connects this to Brett because Channing thinks James is a druggie and no good for his granddaughter. Channing only has months left to live and was doing this to save Brett’s life,” What little of life that was left to me, I might be save the rest of hers”(Patterson 413). Channing confesses and walks Caroline through the night that changed Brett’s life forever and no sooner does he finish and he asks Caroline to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As criminology majors, we must learn the inner workings of the court system as well as the crucial courtroom players. We have all watched series such as Law and Order, CSI, American Crime, etc., but they give us a false sense of what an actual courtroom setup looks like. Unlike these shows, there are various steps that must be taken before the defendant is prosecuted. There is the arrest, initial appearance, bail is set, either a grand jury or preliminary hearing is conducted, arraignment occurs, along with all pre-trial motions being heard before trial, a trial is then started, a sentence is given, and sometimes the defendant appeals the charge. In contrast, assembly line justice cases end at the arraignment phase since the defendant accepts a plea deal.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The evidence against David Doe is all circumstantial because there no body. David Doe was the last person to see the victim Jane Doe before her disappearance. David and Jane Doe had a stormy marital relationship and Jane told her son that she was going to leave her husband David. David falsely stated that Jane car broke down in town but Jane’s car location near Scioto River in Portsmouth Ohio. At the location of the car there was a second vehicle tire tracks were present.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1862, a young girl named Caroline Dennant served as a slave for the Levi family in Louisville, Kentucky. Caroline did many duties around the house and also served as a nanny for the Levi family’s only daughter, Blanche. The main focus of Caroline’s journey began when young Blanche consumed strychnine (a poison) and killed her almost instantly. Being that Caroline was the one taking care of Blanche, she got blamed for the child’s death as a murderer. While all of this is true, there is different pieces of evidence that changes every aspect of this case.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the notion of legal precedent molded by local interests? Barbara Yngvesson, in her essay entitled Inventing Law in Local Settings: Rethinking Popular Legal Culture, asserts that the foundation of justice and communal identity rests with the American court system. Though all members of the judiciary body remain “unbiased,” this idea suggests an overpowering force behind local petitions which are, thus, used as vehicles to deliver justice and identity. Linda Greenhouse, author of Becoming Justice Blackmun, offers an alternative approach to this question through detailed analysis of the career of Justice Blackmun. With deep insights, Blackmun effectively conveys stare decisis in relation to restrictions the Supreme Court places on certain…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel Adedayo Cynthia Cravens English 101 17th November , 2015 “Advertising’s Fifteen Basic Appeals.” by Jib Fowles. Advertisements have become an integral part in our day to day lives. The society in which we are living has been shaped by the endless advertisements. This essay explains how Jib Fowles has analyzed the emotional appeals that advertisers use to shape the consumers physiological and psychological needs.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Chapter Four, Show Trial, of Amy Bach’s Ordinary Injustice depicts a case of wrongful conviction that occurred over twenty years ago. Michael Evans and Paul Terry, both ages seventeen, had been charged with raping and murdering nine-year-old Lisa Cabassa. The crime occurred the evening of January 14, 1976, when Lisa and her eleven year old brother Ricky were walking to a friend’s house and got separated. Later when Ricky returned home he and his family realized Lisa never made it home. The only witness to Lisa’s abduction was Judy Januszewski, who didn’t come forward until days later.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    NAME & CASE DETAILS: R v Brent Dreamer was a case heard by the District Court, in which Brent Dreamer had been accused and charged with unlawful stalking. The offence was outlined in section 19AA of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act, 1935. The case was held at a preliminary hearing in the Mount Gambier Magistrates Court, where the defendant elected a trial by jury. The judge that heard the case in the District Court was Judge Boomer. The prosecutor accused Dreamer of unlawful stalking because of the instances described in his hearing, such as constant phone calls and visiting when his presence was unwanted.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To add to Mason’s post, professional judgment and personal judgment differ only in the basis of the norms used to make decisions upon. Each judgment uses rules to base their decisions upon except that professional judgment calls for a specific end user to be focused on. In accounting, that end user is referred to as the public. A distinguishing mark, if not the distinguishing mark, of a public accountant, on the other hand, is that the accountant’s primary obligation is to the public, and in a broader sense to the truth – the accuracy and veracity of the financial statements with which they deal (Duska, Duska, & Ragatz, 2011, p .82). In addition to this, the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct highlights professional competence as in actions…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Concretely, surveys show that over half of respondents undertake the idea that drug felons comprise the large percentage of the country's inmate population. Virtually 80 percent are certain that judges ought to be discrete in passing judgment on the basis details of the case as a substitute for being constricted by fixed minimum sentences. These beliefs are optimally true and the federal government should amend the approaches it takes on petty crimes to prevent incarcerating many people for far too…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Summary Judgment

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    II. Standard for Summary Judgment Rule 56 of the Federal rules of Civil Procedure governs the standard for summary judgment. The rule states, “The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Inarguably, the Supreme Court has played an imperative role in the development and evolution of the fellow coordinate branches of government and in the society of the United States as well, and what is deducible as a consequence of this is that the individuals whom have served within this institution have incorporated, however subtly, their own inclinations into this evolution. Indeed, it is a matter-of-fact that throughout all of our lives, it is impossible to avoid the persuasions of family, peers, and societal constructs upon the reflections and perceptions that we utilize in order to derive our own attitudes, values, and ideologies. Additionally, the scope and position of the Supreme Court has provided it with unique opportunities in which…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges: The book of judges is a book written in essence to raise awareness of Gods greatness as the ultimate judge and that “religious compromise lead to moral corruption” (Hindson & Towns, 2013). It is said to be written by the prophet Samuel, no actual proof of authorship has been confirmed, but he was a major spiritual leader in this time period (Hindson & Towns, 2013). Due to the characters listed in the book and assumed author, an estimated date of 1050-1000 BC has been given as well as a prophetic literary genre (Hindson & Towns, 2013). Within these chapters are a series of six cycles that take place, Israelites sin against God, He brings tragedies against them, when they repent He then brings up a judge to deliver them from oppression.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are many things according to the Kzinski article and class discussions that can limit a judges discretion. In the article, it mentions that an example of judge discretion is that judges often have to base their findings strictly off the constitution. This is very limiting because the constitution says very specific things for example, in the constitution under article 2 section 1 that says "no person except a natural- born citizen or a citizen of the US, at the time of the adoption of the constitution, shall be eligible to be president". There is essentially no way around that and since the constitution often does not change, judges are limited in their decision making process by this and often times only the constitution. The are often…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the 8th of November I visited Oxford crown court; whilst I had previously attended various levels of courts to witness trials, I had never watched a sentencing. Therefore, intrigued to see the process, I decided to watch the sentencing of Tom Mobey. Immediately upon entering the courtroom I noticed a very different atmosphere to trial, one that was much more private and personal. There was a limited number of people in court: just the two opposing counsel, a clerk, the defendant and his accompanying custody officer. In addition, the defendant was not retained in the dock behind glass, but rather sat in front of it.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Hanging Judge Analysis

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosopher, Jiddu Krishnamurti once said, “The ability to observe without evaluating is the highest form of intelligence.” (Vajda, 2009). However, every person on this planet is guilty of passing judgement on other individuals. Whether the evaluation be made in a local grocery store or in as contentious an environment as a United States courtroom, humans are all guilty of judging individuals by their perceived covers. In an ideal world, legal punishments would reflect officials’ objectivity toward permissible evidence, however, empirical research has revealed additional arbitrary factors.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics